Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Resti Hefriyenni
Universitas Rokania
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Strategi Interest-based bargaining dalam Mediasi Sengketa Pembagian Harta Bersama Berupa Tanah Pasca Perceraian Budi Hatono; Rabiuladawiyah; Resti Hefriyenni; Arfika Nurvita Sari; Fat Haryanto Lisda; Ramses Hutagaol
Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/k2cfkb29

Abstract

Sengketa pembagian harta bersama berupa tanah pasca perceraian merupakan salah satu konflik keluarga yang sering menimbulkan ketegangan berkepanjangan di masyarakat. Permasalahan tersebut tidak hanya berkaitan dengan aspek hukum kepemilikan, tetapi juga menyangkut hubungan emosional, kepentingan ekonomi, serta kondisi sosial para pihak setelah perceraian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan strategi interest-based bargaining dalam mediasi sengketa pembagian harta bersama berupa tanah pasca perceraian di Desa Rambah Hilir serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan mediasi. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi lapangan, dan studi dokumentasi yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi interest-based bargaining mampu mendorong terciptanya kesepakatan yang lebih fleksibel dan berkeadilan karena mediator tidak hanya berfokus pada posisi para pihak, melainkan menggali kepentingan mendasar yang melatarbelakangi tuntutan masing-masing pihak. Keberhasilan mediasi dipengaruhi oleh kemampuan mediator membangun komunikasi, tingkat keterbukaan para pihak, kondisi sosial ekonomi, serta keberadaan hubungan kekeluargaan yang masih terjalin pasca perceraian. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa pendekatan interest-based bargaining dapat menjadi model penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif dalam konflik pembagian harta bersama di masyarakat.
Representative Versus Direct Democracy in Regional Head Elections: A Constitutional Analysis of Popular Sovereignty in Indonesia Ridho Harapan Bunda; Muhammad Fadli; Resti Hefriyenni
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.52143

Abstract

The discourse on returning the election of regional heads to the Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD) has resurfaced in Indonesia’s constitutional debate, gaining significant support from major factions in the national parliament. This proposal is primarily driven by the exponential rise in political costs and widespread money politics, which are viewed as eroding the integrity of direct elections. What began as a procedural debate has now evolved into a fundamental discussion about the most suitable model of local democracy in light of Indonesia’s current political realities. This study examines the discourse through constitutional analysis, positioning popular sovereignty as the central normative variable while assessing its implications for local democracy quality. Using statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes laws and democratic doctrines. The findings indicate that the phrase “elected democratically” in Article 18 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution allows flexible interpretation, accommodating both direct and indirect election models. However, returning authority to the DPRD risks consolidating local political oligarchies, weakening legislative oversight, and limiting public participation. Ultimately, the dysfunction in local democracy stems not primarily from the direct election system, but from institutional weaknesses, declining political ethics, and low accountability of democratic actors.
Co-Authors Arfika Nurvita Sari Budi Hatono Fat Haryanto Lisda Muhammad Fadli Rabiuladawiyah Ramses Hutagaol Ridho Harapan Bunda