Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Penguatan Literasi Hukum Lintas Negara Bagi Masyarakat Perbatasan (Di Kawasan Perbatasan Indonesia–Papua Nugini, Sota Merauke) Yuldiana Zesa Azis; Marlyn Jane Alputila; Emiliana Bernadina Rahail; Nasri Wijaya; Ahmad Ali Muddin
Sagu: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 3 No 1 (2026): SAGU - JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Astha Grafika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65675/sjp.v3i1.233

Abstract

The Indonesia–Papua New Guinea border area in Sota District, Merauke Regency is characterized by high cross-border activities that require adequate legal understanding among the community. The research problem lies in the low level of legal literacy regarding immigration procedures, travel documents, and citizens’ rights and obligations. This study aims to improve legal literacy through cross-border legal education programs. The research method employs a participatory approach through legal counseling, interactive discussions, case studies, and the distribution of educational materials such as guidebooks and legal information sheets. The results indicate an increase in community understanding of cross-border legal regulations, the importance of compliance with laws, and applicable procedures in cross-border activities. Furthermore, the educational approach enhances legal awareness and strengthens the legal culture of the border community. In conclusion, cross-border legal education programs are effective in improving legal literacy and should be implemented sustainably through collaboration among stakeholders.
Menakar Keselarasan Hukum Nasional Terhadap Instrumen Internasional Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Access To Justice Masyarakat Adat Yuldiana Zesa Azis; Marlyn Jane Alputila; Emiliana Bernadina Rahail; Nasri Wijaya; Ahmad Ali Muddin
Jurnal Restorative Justice Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Restorative Justice
Publisher : Universitas Musamus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/jrj.v10i1.7811

Abstract

Indigenous peoples in Indonesia systematically face normative and structural barriers that trigger the marginalization of their living spaces and the failure to fulfill their right to justice. This study aims to assess the degree of alignment between national regulations and international instruments, particularly the 2007 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), regarding the right to access to justice for indigenous peoples, while mapping the normative barriers in domestic agrarian disputes. The research method employed is normative juridical, utilizing statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The results demonstrate a sharp paradigm misalignment. UNDRIP promotes the recognition of inherent rights (sui generis) and the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC). Conversely, Indonesian positive law is characterized by state-centered positivism (positivisme etatis), which reduces customary land rights (hak ulayat) to state-granted rights through restrictive administrative prerequisites via Regional Regulations (Peraturan Daerah). At the judicial level, civil procedural law is highly formalistic-positivistic, elevating written evidence (Article 1867 of the Indonesian Civil Code) and thereby sidelining customary evidence based on oral traditions or natural boundaries. This condition is exacerbated by contemporary regulations, such as the Job Creation Law through the Land Bank institution and the New Criminal Code, which escalate conflicts and structural criminalization, as seen in Rempang Island and Nangahale. The prolonged delay in enacting the Indigenous Peoples Bill creates an absolute norm vacuum that perpetuates a pseudo formalistic-procedural justice. Therefore, a progressive reconstruction of legal policy is required through the accelerated enactment of the Indigenous Peoples Bill, the issuance of Supreme Court Regulations to equalize non-written evidence, and the integration of customary courts into the national judicial system to achieve substantive justice.
LEGITIME PORTIE SEBAGAI MEKANISME PERLINDUNGAN HAK AHLI WARIS: STUDI KOMPARATIF ANTARA HUKUM PERDATA DAN HUKUM ADAT PAPUA Yuldiana Zesa Azis; Emiliana B. Rahail; Nasri Wijaya; Ahmad Ali Muddin
Animha Law Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2025): Animha Law Journal
Publisher : Astha Grafika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65675/alj.v2i2.191

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis konsep legitime portie dalam hukum perdata (BW) sebagai perlindungan hak ahli waris, membandingkannya dengan prinsip pewarisan dalam hukum adat Papua, khususnya masyarakat Marind. Legitime portie adalah bagian mutlak warisan yang tak bisa dikesampingkan pewasiat, berlandaskan keadilan distributif dan moralitas hukum. Sebaliknya, pewarisan adat Papua didasarkan pada kolektivitas, kekerabatan, dan nilai spiritual, di mana harta dipandang komunal. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif-komparatif, didukung wawancara tokoh adat. Hasilnya, legitime portie menawarkan perlindungan legal formal hak individu, sementara hukum adat Papua memberikan perlindungan sosial-komunal yang berakar pada nilai kekerabatan, sejalan dengan teori hukum responsif. Ketegangan antara individualisme hukum perdata dan kolektivitas hukum adat menyoroti dualisme hukum di Indonesia. Integrasi nilai lokal penting untuk mencapai keadilan substantif dalam konteks multikultural Indonesia.
Membangun Kesadaran Digital: Sosialisasi Hak dan Kewajiban dalam Penggunaan Media Sosial di SMA 1 Yapis Merauke Dyana Hesti Kamila; Roro Anggi Sukmawati; Syadila Ainun Nisa; Yulidiana Zesa Azis; Poetri Enindah Suradinata; Zegovia Parera; Nasri Wijaya; Ahmad Ali Muddin; Anton Johanis Silubun
Sagu: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 2 No 2 (2025): SAGU - JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Astha Grafika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65675/sjp.v2i2.162

Abstract

  In the era of globalization, social media has become the main communication tool that affects people's lives, especially teenagers. The community service activity entitled "Wise at the Fingertips: The Importance of Understanding Rights and Obligations in Using Social Media" was implemented at SMA 1 Yapis Merauke to improve digital legal literacy among students. Through interactive lecture methods, group discussions, and case study simulations, this activity aims to provide an understanding of the ITE Law and legal issues related to the use of social media. Although attended by only 9 students, this activity succeeded in creating an atmosphere of in-depth discussion and increasing students' awareness of the legal risks that may arise from their online activities. Evaluation results showed a significant increase in understanding of digital ethics and social media responsibility. This activity emphasizes the importance of communicative and relevant legal education to form a wise and responsible young generation in using social media. Recommendations for the development of similar programs include expanding the range of participants and collaborating with more schools.