Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Media Resonansi Pengabdian Masyarakat International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law
Dewi Nadya Maharani
Law Study Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Sistem Administrasi Negara sebagai Pilar Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia Sulistyowati Sulistyowati; Dewi Nadya Maharani; Umar Husin; Syaidrawan Syaidrawan
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.6421

Abstract

Sistem Administrasi Negara Indonesia berada pada titik persimpangan kritis, menghadapi krisis relevansi dan kepercayaan publik yang menuntut transformasi fundamental. Penelitian ini menganalisis bahwa reformasi parsial tidak lagi memadai untuk menjawab kompleksitas tantangan yang ada. Berbagai kekuatan dinamis—termasuk desentralisasi politik melalui otonomi daerah, imperatif ekonomi untuk menciptakan iklim investasi yang kondusif, serta disrupsi teknologi digital—secara kolektif mendorong kebutuhan akan perubahan paradigma. Analisis mendalam terhadap patologi internal birokrasi, seperti budaya kerja feodalistik dan rendahnya kualitas sumber daya manusia, menunjukkan adanya siklus negatif yang menghambat kemajuan. Di sisi lain, dinamika eksternal menciptakan sebuah tensi strategis antara dorongan sentralisasi demi efisiensi ekonomi dan mandat desentralisasi untuk responsivitas demokrasi. Sebagai respons, penelitian ini mengusulkan kerangka kerja  Rekonseptualisasi (mengubah filosofi dari 'mengatur' menjadi 'melayani'), Reposisi (menggeser peran dari penyedia monopoli menjadi fasilitator dan katalisator), dan Revitalisasi (menanamkan kapabilitas baru). Revitalisasi ini diartikulasikan melalui adopsi konsep Dynamic Governance, yang menekankan pada pengembangan kapabilitas adaptif sebagai kunci untuk membangun aparatur negara yang antisipatif, resilien, dan berpusat pada warga negara, yang pada akhirnya mampu menyelenggarakan pelayanan publik berkualitas tinggi di tengah ketidakpastian. Untuk mengawasi pelayanan publik maka peran ombudsman sangat diperlukan. Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan adalah pendekatan normatif.
KAJIAN HUKUM PENYUSUNAN RENCANA INDUK (MASTER PLAN) BANDAR UDARA INTERNASIONAL KUALANAMU: FUNGSI PENTING MELALUI UDARA Sawitri Yuli Hartati S.; Roosdiana Harahap; Dewi Nadya Maharani; Setiyono Setiyono
Media Resonansi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 1, No 2 (2025): Media Resonansi Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Taksasila Edukasi Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Adanya arahan pengembangan wilayah Kabupaten Deli Serdang berdasarkan Perda No. 1 Tahun 2021 tentang RTRW Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2021-2041. Pemerintah Kabupaten Deli Serdang memiliki kebijakan penataan ruang yang fokus pada pelestarian lingkungan, pengembangan pusat layanan merata, dan peningkatan infrastruktur berkualitas untuk pertumbuhan ekonomi. Dalam sektor transportasi, rencananya adalah mengembangkan sistem jaringan udara yang komprehensif. Termasuk menjadikan Bandara Kualanamu sebagai bandara pengumpul utama, mengembangkan bandara pengumpan sekunder, dan membangun bandara baru untuk meningkatkan mobilitas di seluruh Sumatera Utara. Maka diperlukan suatu review rencana induk, DLKr DLKp Bandar Udara Internasional Kualanamu sesuai Peraturan Direktur lenderal Perhubungan Udara Nomor: KP 590 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Teknis Pembuatan Rencana Induk Bandar Udara, guna pengembangan lebih baik sesuai dengan kebijakan daerah. Penelitian ini bersifat empiris, data yang diperoleh merupakan data primer, yaitu data yang langsung diperoleh dari sumber data sebagai data pertama atau data dari tangan pertama. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara teknik observasi dan wawancara.Kata Kunci: Kajian Hukum, Rencana Induk, Bandar Udara Internasional
Legal Protection of Vulnerable Consumers in Digital Transactions in Indonesia Dewi Nadya Maharani; Muhamad Afifullah; Fauzan Muzakki; Henni Wijayanti; Roosdiana Harahap
Rechtsidee Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v14i1.1143

Abstract

General Background: The rapid growth of e-commerce, fintech, and digital platforms has transformed consumer interactions while increasing consumer risks in the digital economy. Specific Background: Consumer protection in Indonesia is governed by the Consumer Protection Law and supported by the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and sectoral regulations related to electronic systems. Knowledge Gap: Despite these regulations, legal fragmentation creates uncertainty and fails to explicitly recognize vulnerable consumers in digital transactions. Aims: This study develops a conceptual framework for vulnerable consumers and examines its incorporation into Indonesia’s Consumer Protection Law. Results: The findings reveal that Indonesia’s legal framework remains formally equal and fragmented, providing only partial protection through sectoral regulations while leaving many vulnerable groups insufficiently protected. Novelty: The study integrates theories of legal protection, distributive justice, the welfare state, and consumer rights to propose a vulnerability-sensitive framework. Implications: The findings support the harmonization of consumer protection, electronic transaction, and personal data protection laws to establish a more adaptive and inclusive consumer protection system in Indonesia’s digital ecosystem.  Highlights: Indonesia’s consumer protection regime does not explicitly recognize vulnerable consumers in digital transactions. Regulatory fragmentation creates legal uncertainty and protection gaps. Legal harmonization is needed to support an inclusive digital consumer protection framework. Keywords: Legal Protection, Vulnerable Consumers, Digital Transactions
Voter Rights and Electoral Justice in Indonesia’s 2024 Concurrent Elections: System Design, Institutional Fragmentation, and Dispute Resolution Sulistyowati; Erman I. Rahim; Dewi Nadya Maharani; Mahda Rahman; Gusti Bintang Maharaja
International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Gorontalo Legal Research and Consulting

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66502/2e11b149

Abstract

The 2024 Indonesian general elections were the largest and most administratively complex democratic exercise in the country’s history, combining presidential, national legislative, and regional legislative contests on a single polling day and holding regional executive elections later in the same year. This article examines the causal relationship between the design of the concurrent election system and the protection of voters’ constitutional rights, and evaluates whether Indonesia’s dispute resolution architecture is capable of delivering electoral justice. Using normative-juridical research supported by secondary empirical data, and combining statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, the article advances two arguments. First, the “five-ballot” concurrent design satisfies the formal dimension of the right to vote while eroding its substantive dimension: it imposes an extreme administrative and physical burden on polling station officials and a cognitive burden on voters, so that high turnout coexists with attenuated deliberative capacity, particularly in legislative contests displaced by presidential coattails. Second, the fragmentation of electoral adjudication among the Constitutional Court, the Election Supervisory Agency, the Honorary Council of Election Organisers, and the State Administrative Court generates divergent standards of proof, inconsistent characterisation of identical conduct, and gaps in remedial authority that are most consequential precisely where structured, systematic, and massive violations are alleged. Analysis of the 2024 election result disputes indicates a discernible movement toward substantive justice, but one constrained by evidentiary thresholds and procedural limits rather than by judicial willingness. The article contributes an integrated account linking concurrency, voter protection, and forum fragmentation, and argues that reconstructing the electoral calendar and unifying electoral jurisdiction are complementary rather than alternative reforms.
Co-Authors Erman I. Rahim Fauzan Muzakki Gusti Bintang Maharaja Henni Wijayanti Mahda Rahman Muhamad Afifullah Roosdiana Harahap Sawitri Yuli Hartati S. Setiyono Setiyono Sulistyowati Sulistyowati Sulistyowati Syaidrawan Syaidrawan Umar Husin