Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kohabitasi (Kumpul Kebo) dalam Perspektif Relasi Aku-Engkau Martin Buber: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Dialog Maria Claudia Lodan; Felix Riondi Sugar; Yulius Argenio Eko; Heribertus Harsoyo; Fransisco G. N. Nggajo; Champideli A. Jalni; Alfeus Alfian Nenat; Simon Oktafianus Nailiu; Antonius Sunarno Sam; Alfonsius Lulus Nifu
Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/dewantara.v5i1.7694

Abstract

The phenomenon of cohabitation or living together without a legally recognized marriage has become one of the social issues developing in modern society. Changes in values, cultural development, economic factors, and shifting understandings of commitment and marriage have contributed to the increasing practice of cohabitation. In the Indonesian context, this phenomenon generates debate because it encounters legal, religious, and cultural norms that consider marriage as an important institution in human life. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of cohabitation through Martin Buber’s dialogical philosophy, particularly the concepts of the I-It and I-Thou relations. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach by analyzing Martin Buber’s works and various literature related to cohabitation, marriage, and human relations. The findings indicate that cohabitation cannot merely be understood as a legal or moral issue but also as a philosophical issue concerning the quality of human relationships. From Buber’s perspective, relationships oriented only toward personal needs, comfort, or specific interests tend to become I-It relations because the other person is reduced to an object. Conversely, the I-Thou relation emphasizes respect for personal dignity, openness, responsibility, and authentic encounters between individuals. Therefore, Martin Buber’s thought provides a critical reflection that human relationships should be built upon dialogue, responsibility, and respect for others as complete and valuable persons.
Paradoks Bangsa Religius dan Praktik Korupsi: Telaah Filosofis terhadap Sila Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa dalam Pancasila Hermanus Siga; Felix Riondi Sugar; Alexandro Mega No; Marselinus S.D.M. Cola; Fridolin Dee; Adrianus Romi; Heribertus Harsoyo; Andrianus Ovin; Ignasius Anggal; Fransiskus Borgio Rajo
Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa
Publisher : Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58192/populer.v5i1.5373

Abstract

Corruption is a multidimensional problem that not only causes economic losses to the state but also reflects a moral and religious crisis in national life. This study aims to analyze the paradox between Indonesia's identity as a religious nation and the persistence of corrupt practices through a philosophical examination of the first principle of Pancasila, Belief in the One and Only God. The research employs a qualitative method using a descriptive-analytical approach based on library research. Data were collected from books, scholarly journal articles, official documents, and other relevant literature on corruption, Pancasila, and the philosophy of religion, and were analyzed using philosophical and interpretative methods. The findings indicate that corruption is not merely a violation of law or an abuse of power but also a denial of the moral values embodied in the first principle of Pancasila. Corrupt practices reveal a significant gap between the religious identity embraced by Indonesian society and the actual implementation of honesty, responsibility, and justice in public life. This study concludes that combating corruption requires not only legal and institutional reforms but also the strengthening of moral awareness, character formation, and the internalization of the values of Belief in the One and Only God as the ethical foundation of national and state life.