Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

IBN QAYYIM AL-JAUZIAH DAN PENDAPATNYA TENTANG TRADISI KALAM Na'mah, Ulin
UNIVERSUM : Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan Vol 9, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : IAIN Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/universum.v9i1.75

A worriness about the mix of ilm al-kalam with ilm al-Mantiq of Aristoteles, which is considered inconsistent, have prompted several Muslim thinkers like Ibn Taimiyah and Ibn Qayyim Al-Jauziah to ban the available ilm al-kalam at that time. They both believed that, in ilm al-Mantiq of Aristoteles, there is no qiyas aula or an effort of humanizing God and, therefore, it will result in not recognizing God as creator of universe (because universe exists by himself). Thus, the tradition of Ã‚Â ilm al-Mantiq have made someone to be kufr. Meanwhile, the ulama of kalam have tended to also used AristotelesÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ framework of thinking in building their arguments. At the end, ulama of kalam have also trapped in kufr.Keywords: Tradisi Ilmu Kalam, Mutakallimun, Ilmu Mantiq dan Kekufuran

Economic and Nafkah in the Case of Divorce in Indonesia: The Perspective of Fiqh Sa'adah, Mazro'atus; Abubakar, Fatum; Na'mah, Ulin
Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 4, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/ajifl.v4i1.2928

The number of divorce cases filed by wives is increasing. One of the factors considered to be the cause is the Nafkah issue. Accordingly, the discourse on the problem of sustenance as a reason for divorce among classical fiqh scholars and reinterpreting the text to find a solution to the high rate of divorce due to economic and living reasons, without having to leave the classical Islamic scholar’s legal tradition, needs to be studied more deeply. This research aims to provide a solution to prevent divorce caused by family conflicts due to economic factors by reviewing the concept of alimony from the perspective of fiqh. This research is qualitative, using a normative approach to fiqh and interpretation. The results of this study indicated that there was a need for reinterpretation of the views of the majority of scholars regarding the wife’s right to ask for a divorce from the judge if the husband does not provide a living. If the opinion of the fiqh scholars continues to be applied, it will increase the number of divorce cases for economic and livelihood reasons. Moreover, this action received legitimacy from stakeholders through marriage laws and regulations. The interpretation of KH. Husayn Muhammad’s of Q.S. al-Nisa' (4): 34 needs to be used as a reference in updating the law regarding the obligation of a living so that it is hoped that there will be no more divorces carried out for economic and livelihood reasons.

Penyuluhan Hukum sebagai Upaya Preventif Pernikahan Dini dan Perundungan di Kalangan Remaja Na'mah, Ulin; Dermawan, Rizki; Rizal, Moch. Choirul; Rachmatulloh, Mochammad Agus; Widodo, Muhammad Fajar Sidiq; Qamaria, Rezki Suci; Mayaningsih, Afifah; Putri, Kharisma Firda Candra; Inderaswari, Siska Fajri; Aji, Michelle Salma Khotom; Alfan M, M Ijaz
Kontribusi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Mei 2024
Publisher : Cipta Media Harmoni

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53624/kontribusi.v4i2.428

Pernikahan dini dan perundungan (bullying) merupakan dua isu yang krusial di kalangan remaja Indonesia. Kedua masalah tersebut memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap perkembangan fisik, mental, dan sosial remaja. Dalam upaya mengurangi insiden pernikahan dini dan perundungan pada remaja, diperlukan penyuluhan hukum sebagai upaya preventif. Penyuluhan hukum merupakan kegiatan edukasi yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman masyarakat tentang hukum yang berlaku. Penyuluhan ini sangat penting dalam mencegah pernikahan dini dan perundungan dengan cara meningkatkan kesadaran hukum remaja seperti memberikan informasi mengenai undang-undang perlindungan anak, hak-hak anak, dan konsekuensi hukum dari pernikahan dini dan perundungan. Dimana kegiatan tersebut merupakan wujud nyata pengabdian Fakultas Syariah IAIN Kediri kepada masyarakat dengan metode Participatory Action Reasearch (PAR). Hasil kegiatan ini menyimpulkan bahwa penyuluhan hukum adalah alat yang efektif dalam upaya preventif pernikahan dini dan perundungan di kalangan remaja. Dengan meningkatkan kesadaran hukum dan menyediakan edukasi yang komprehensif, diharapkan insiden pernikahan dini dan perundungan dapat dikurangi secara signifikan.

Polemik Penyatuatapan Peradilan Agama di Bawah Mahkamah Agung Na'mah, Ulin
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 52 No 1 (2018)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v52i1.309

Abstract: This article explores the debatable problems concerning with the unification of the Religious Courts under the auspices of the Supreme Court. The transfer of authority of the Religious Courts from the Ministry of Religion Affairs to the Supreme Court was deemed inappropriate and uprooted Religious Courts from its historical roots. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the historical context of Religious Courts and its contemporary dynamics in the form of its unification under the justice system in Indonesia. This research concludes that the positioning of Religious Courts under the auspices of Ministry of Religious Affairs since the independence era was not an attempt to weaken its authority, but rather an effort to save Religious Courts from the threat of dismissal. Religious Court was posed to the threat of dismissal during the political turmoil in the early establishment of Indonesian state due to disputes over the determination of ideal form of the Indonesian state, between a secular state, a religious state, or a nation state. Thus, the transfer of the Relligious Courts from Ministry of Religious Affairs to the same roof with other courts under the auspices of the Supreme Court is not an effort to reduce the authority of the Religious Court or weaken existence. In fact, this unification has returned the Religious Court to its approriate position and eliminated the long-standing negative stigma against this institution.Abstrak: Artikel ini mengeksplorasi problematika penyatuatapan Pengadilan Agama (PA) di bawah Mahkamah Agung (MA) yang menyebabkan polemik. Pengalihan keberadaan PA dari Kementerian Agama ke MA dianggap tidak tepat dan membuat PA tercerabut dari akar historisnya. Oleh karena itu, perlu dianalisis lebih mendalam terkait sinkronisasi sejarah PA dan dinamika kontemporernya berupa unifikasi sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keberadaan PA di bawah Kementerian Agama yang terjadi sejak masa kemerdekaan bukanlah upaya pengebirian terhadap PA, melainkan merupakan sebuah bentuk usaha penyelamatan PA dari ancaman penghapusan. Ancaman penghapusan tersebut muncul ketika negara Indonesia masih belum stabil dikarenakan adanya perselisihan tentang diskursus bentuk negara Indonesia, antara negara sekuler, negara agama, dan nation state. Dengan demikian, keberadaan PA yang menjadi satu atap dengan peradilan lainnya di bawah MA bukanlah upaya mengurangi kewenangan atau melemahkan PA. Sebaliknya, penyatuatapan ini telah mengembalikan PA pada posisi seharusnya dan menghilangkan stigma negatif yang dituduhkan kepada PA selama ini.

Economic and Nafkah in the Case of Divorce in Indonesia: The Perspective of Fiqh Sa'adah, Mazro'atus; Abubakar, Fatum; Na'mah, Ulin
Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 4, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/ajifl.v4i1.2928

The number of divorce cases filed by wives is increasing. One of the factors considered to be the cause is the Nafkah issue. Accordingly, the discourse on the problem of sustenance as a reason for divorce among classical fiqh scholars and reinterpreting the text to find a solution to the high rate of divorce due to economic and living reasons, without having to leave the classical Islamic scholar’s legal tradition, needs to be studied more deeply. This research aims to provide a solution to prevent divorce caused by family conflicts due to economic factors by reviewing the concept of alimony from the perspective of fiqh. This research is qualitative, using a normative approach to fiqh and interpretation. The results of this study indicated that there was a need for reinterpretation of the views of the majority of scholars regarding the wife’s right to ask for a divorce from the judge if the husband does not provide a living. If the opinion of the fiqh scholars continues to be applied, it will increase the number of divorce cases for economic and livelihood reasons. Moreover, this action received legitimacy from stakeholders through marriage laws and regulations. The interpretation of KH. Husayn Muhammad’s of Q.S. al-Nisa' (4): 34 needs to be used as a reference in updating the law regarding the obligation of a living so that it is hoped that there will be no more divorces carried out for economic and livelihood reasons.

INTERPRETATIONS OF NAFKAH, GENDER RELATIONS, AND MOTIVATIONS FOR DIVORCE: A CASE STUDY OF DIVORCE LAWSUITS AT THE KEDIRI CITY RELIGIOUS COURT Na'mah, Ulin; Rachmatulloh, Mochamamd Agus
istinbath Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ijhi.v23i1.700

The phenomenon of high divorce in Indonesian religious courts or Muslim communities causes government anxiety and raises cynical public opinion. Economic considerations are frequently referred to as the excuse for the wife's lawsuit. Data from the Kediri City Religious Court shows that there is a tendency for wives to file for divorce first. Not without justification, it is frequently prompted by the husband's perceived inability to satisfy the wife's requirements. The use of nafkah reasons in divorce can reveal that there is a contradictory tendency; on the one hand, women tend to charge a nafkah to men, and on the other hand, there is a tendency not to charge a nafkah to men or are willing to work to make ends meet. Divorce may not be a factor in limited economic conditions, but the perception of nafkah obligations imposed on husbands. It is critical to recognize that attempts to avoid divorce cannot be based just on economic empowerment but rather on cultural and religious ideas on partnerships and the separation of husband and wife roles. , this article examines the relationship between a contested divorce and economic conditions and perceptions of gender relations in the family, especially in earning a nafkah, to clarify this contradiction. Using a phenomenological approach. The economic reasons that have led wives to divorce are solely due to emptiness and even an emotional drought of love between husbands' wives. The indulgence of husband and wife in dividing household roles from transitional to egalitarian ideology also requires attention and respect for each other.

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 6 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search