Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Legal Accountability of Budget Authorities in Refocusing Corona Virus Disease 19 Aprilianti, Rindi; Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana
Academos Vol 1 No 2 (2022): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/aca.v1i2.14329

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study focuses on analyzing the legal accountability of budgetary power in refocusing covid-19. According to data from Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW), state losses in 2020 amounted to Rp. 18.173 trillion, while in 2021, state losses due to corruption cases amounted to Rp. 26.83 trillion. this is in line with the case of social assistance provided by the government including the PKH (Hope Family Program), the Basic Food Card Program, the Bulog Rice Assistance Program, and the BST (Cash Social Assistance) Program. Related legal issues raised and analyzed, 1) Discussion on legal accountability (KSSK) in the analysis of article 27 paragraph (2) Perppu No.1 of 2020 and 2) Legal efforts in enforcing the COVID-19 budget refocusing. Using social-legal methods. The results of the study based on 1) Article 27 paragraph (2) of Perppu No.1 of 2020 and Government Regulations of Presidential Instruction No. 4 of 2020 show the enforcement of budget refocusing by placing the position of regional heads or executive organs in budgeting and budget execution issues. With criminal justice with imprisonment and fines in accordance with Article 12 letter a of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001. 2) Strengthening the mechanism of the role of law enforcement in the budget refocusing system is needed by maximizing implementation of the rules of corruption during the Covid-19 pandemic effectively and provide a deterrent effect through a letter of claim.
Dua Dekade Kebebasan Akademik di Indonesia: Tantangan di Tengah Menguatnya Otoritarianisme dalam Model Barunya Wiratraman, Herlambang Perdana; Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana
Jurnal HAM Vol 15, No 2 (2024): August Edition
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan HAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2024.15.143-158

Abstract

This research focuses on analyzing the debates and roles of the academic freedom movement in Indonesia’s authoritarian politics. Numbers of scholars argued on the democracy decline and its current situation of authoritarian turn (Mietzner 2016, 2020; Hadiz 2017; Wiratraman 2018; Waburton and Aspinal 2019; and Winters 2021). Authoritarianism governance in recent politics has been worsening situation of free expression, including academic freedom. Recently, one of attacks is connected to cyber-attacks, which has been targeting journalists, academics, activists or students who defend human rights and environment, indigenous leaders, anti-corruption activists, and women's groups. This article discusses first, how has academic freedom at campuses been shaped by Indonesia's the rise of authoritarian politics; and second how academic freedom has been influenced and easily attacked in the rise of digital authoritarianism. By using an interdisciplinary approach, this article argues that there is a strong relation between the threat of academic freedom and the strengthening of authoritarianism in Indonesia, especially by disciplining campuses through a more systematic bureaucratization. While at the same time, academic freedom has been affected by stronger control of authoritarianism regime by deplying cyber troops in digital spheres. Hence, this article also discusses how human rights instruments and its institutions could promote and defend academic freedom in general. 
Pertanggungjawaban Agresi Militer Rusia Terhadap Ukraina Di Wilayah Donbass Firmansyah, Fikri Iman; Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana
SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2023): SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sahid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36441/supremasi.v5i2.885

Abstract

Rusia melancarkan agresi ke Ukraina serta mengadakan serbuan dari segala penjuru. Hal ini dianggap sebagai " Perang Putin" oleh semua negara. Salah satu bentuk pertanggungjawaban Rusia terhadap Ukraina akibat perbuatan agresi yakni harus reparasi atau pemulihan terhadap negara yang menjadi korban negara aggressor. Konflik ini belum diakui secara resmi sebagai kejahatan terhadap perdamaian internasional. Negara Ukraina dianggap sebagai korban agresi menurut hukum internasional meskipun agresi kepada Ukraina merupakan pelanggaran nyata terhadap piagam pbb serta statuta roma. Permasalahan utama yang akan dikaji ada dua : (1)Bagaimana pertanggungjawaban secara individu dan kolektif ( sebagai negara) terkait agresi ini.  (2) Mekanisme ajudikasi dan non ajudikasi dari kejahatan agresi yang dilakukan Rusia kepada Ukraina. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui tindakan agresi militer Rusia terhadap Ukraina beserta implikasi hukum yang berlaku. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Sosio-Legal. Untuk menuntut Putin dan para pemimpin politik dan militer Rusia lainnya di pengadilan kriminal internasional memiliki hambatan dari sisi hukum maupun politik. Pengadilan Kriminal Internasional tidak memiliki data terkait kejahatan agresi, serta penarikan diri Rusia dari Pengadilan Kriminal Internasional mampu mereduksi yurisdiksi ICC. Alternatif lain diupayakan yakni pengadilan ad hoc karena kejahatan agresi erat kaitannya dengan kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan dan perang. Atau dengan dilakukannya praktik penerapan yurisdiksi universal untuk mengadili pelaku kejahatan agresi.
Balancing human rights and cybersecurity: Analyzing Indonesia’s legal framework Situmeang, Ampuan; Silviani, Ninne Zahara; Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana; Tan, David; Febriyani, Emiliya
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jhn.v15i2.28738

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: Indonesia has been continuously developing its legal framework regarding many aspects of digital spaces, including cybersecurity, in the quest of maximizing the potentials of Industry 4.0. However, this rapid development of legal framework must be analyzed thoroughly to make sure that it’s in line with the principles of human rights. Purpose/Study Objectives: Drawing from international standards of human rights, this research focuses on analyzing the cybersecurity legal framework in Indonesia, and how the laws and regulations related to it fare against international standards of human rights. Design/Methodology/Approach: Using the normative legal research method, this research analyzes secondary data in the form of primary Indonesian and international law sources to evaluate the protection of human rights in the midst of this legal development. Findings: Findings of this research show that the legal framework in Indonesia does leave many rooms for potential human rights abuse, with normative loopholes and underestimation of potential issues regarding the denial of human rights, within digital spaces. Paper Type: Research Article
Corporate vs Community Head to Head: The Complexity of Land Tenure Conflict in Indonesia Hariri, Achmad; Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana; Arifin, Samsul; Efendi, Ahmad Bahrul; Asis, Asis
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Empowering Community Strengthening Justice in Indonesia and Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v4i1.23354

Abstract

At the end of 2018, residents replanted the land with thousands of banana trunks. In January 2019, Pakel residents were reported by P.T. Bumi Sari; the police summoned 11 residents. In 2020, residents established a command post and planted it for six months. However, in 2020 PT BUMI SARI said it had pocketed the latest Right to Cultivate, which entered some of the villages included in their Right to Cultivate (HGU.). However, a copy document is not owned by the head of the town and residents in Pakel village. This research is a field research or empirical legal research. This research is intended to analyze about the reclaiming reclaiming carried out by the Pakel community, whether it is justified. Futhermore, this research also analyze whether PT Bumi Sari's control of land in Pakel village is against the law. This research concluded that reclaiming by Pakel residents is the right of Pakel residents as with the purpose of the formation of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), which is to bring prosperity, happiness, and justice to the State and the people, especially to the peasants. Right to Cultivate of PT Bumi Sari does not comply with the laws and regulations stipulated in the UUPA. and Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 1996 concerning Cultivation Rights, Building Use Rights, and Land Rights.