Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.137
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justitia et Pax Unes Law Review Jurnal Jatiswara JUSTISI Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Balobe Law Journal Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora CITIZEN: Jurnal Ilmiah Mulitidisiplin Indonesia Verstek Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Rechtsvinding Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Domus Legalis Cogitatio Legal Advice Jurnal Hukum Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Sultan Adam : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Noblesse Oblige Law Journal
setyawan, vincentius patria
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Kajian Terhadap Kewenangan Penetapan Tersangka oleh Hakim dalam Perkara Illegal Logging (Analisis Putusan No. 145/Pid.B/2014/PN.Dpu). Setyawan, Vincentius Patria; Djuyamto, Djuyamto
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v10i1.2657

Abstract

Artikel ini akan membahas terkait dengan kewenangan hakim untuk menetapkan seseorang sebagai tersangka dalam tindak pidana kehutanan yang sejauh ini baru 1 (satu) kali diterapkan dalam Putusan Nomor: 145/Pid.B/2014/PN. Dpu. Tujuan dari penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk menganalisis penerapan kewenangan hakim untuk menetapkan tersangka di dalam pemeriksaan perkara illegal logging. Permasalahan tersebut akan dianalisis dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kasus yang akan berfokus pada ratio decidendi hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan berkaitan dengan penetapan status tersangka dalam proses pemeriksaan di persidangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah hakim dapat menetapkan seseorang sebagai tersangka dalam proses pembuktian apabila ditemukan fakta hukum yang mengarah kepada keterlibatan seseorang dalam tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh terdakwa. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah penetapan tersangka oleh hakim merupakan upaya khusus dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana perusakan hutan yang masih memerlukan sinkronisasi dengan ketentuan hukum acara pidana. Kata Kunci : Penetapan Tersangka; Hakim; Tindak Pidana Kehutanan
Bewijsvoering Analysis of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Cases’s Proving Wisnubroto, Aloysius; Setyawan, Vincentius Patria
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1270

Abstract

An important aspect that cannot be separated from the evidentiary process is related to how to obtain and present evidence to the judge before the trial. Wiretapping as electronic evidence obtained secretly often gives rise to debate from the perspective of bewijsvoering, and the evidentiary value of electronic evidence obtained through wiretapping. This article will discuss the use of wiretapping results as electronic evidence in relation to its evidentiary value in court. The results of this research show that there is a dualism in bewijsvoering the results of wiretapping as electronic evidence, some are of the opinion that bewijsvoering the results of wiretapping as electronic evidence must be obtained legally, and other opinions state that bewijsvoering is a separate matter from proof, as long as the evidence is submitted to the front. the trial is in accordance with the facts and other evidence, then the evidence is considered valid.
The Importance of Law Enforcement Based on Progressive Law in Realizing Community Welfare Setyawan, Vincentius Patria; Halim, Chandera
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1797

Abstract

Progressive Law emerged from Satjipto Rahardjo's idea of ​​seeing the worrying reality of law enforcement in Indonesia. The law tends to favor the strong and oppress the weak, sharp downwards but dull upwards. This article discusses the importance of having behavior based on Progressive Law in law enforcement. The method used in writing this article is a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. The results of this research are that law enforcement that improves the welfare of the people in the style of Progressive Law will be formed if law enforcement officers have progressive law enforcement behavior. The meaning of progressive behavior is law enforcement that is sensitive to the realization of the values ​​of justice, and is not confined solely to the formulation of the text of the law. Such law enforcement will create justice, benefit and welfare for society.
The Illusion of the Presumption of Innocence in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System: A Hermeneutic Approach Widiartana, Gregorius; Setyawan, Vincentius Patria
Rechtsvinding Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i2.1129

Abstract

Recent high-profile criminal cases in Indonesia have exposed significant gaps between the formal guarantee of the presumption of innocence and its practical application. This study aims to critically examine the “illusion” of the presumption of innocence in the criminal justice system, highlighting how public opinion and media coverage undermine this fundamental principle. The research adopts a hermeneutic approach, emphasizing interpretative analysis of legal texts, court decisions, and media representations to explore the dynamic interplay between normative law and social reality. Findings reveal that, despite its codification in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, the presumption of innocence is frequently compromised in practice: suspects are often treated as guilty prior to judicial determination, influenced by sensationalist reporting and societal pressure. This discrepancy generates a gap between the formal text of the law and its lived reality, producing a sense of procedural injustice and eroding public trust in the judiciary. The study concludes that the presumption of innocence in Indonesia functions more as a normative ideal than an operational reality, particularly in cases that attract widespread media attention. Hermeneutic analysis demonstrates that restoring the principle’s substantive meaning requires a contextual understanding of law as both a normative and social phenomenon, alongside heightened awareness among legal practitioners, media actors, and the public regarding the ethical and procedural obligations inherent in criminal adjudication. The study underscores the necessity of integrating interpretive, human-centered approaches within legal practice to reconcile law’s formal prescriptions with societal realities and to strengthen the operational effectiveness of fundamental procedural rights.
Co-Authors Anditya , Ariesta Wibisono Djuyamto, Djuyamto Dwi Kurniawan, Itok Halim, Chandera ITOK DWI KURNIAWAN Kristianti, Anastasia Priska Kristiyadi Kristiyadi Kurniawati, Indah Yuli Nurzar, Arsyad Widiartana, Gregorius Wisnubroto, Aloysius