Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

The Implementation of Sinking Illegal Fishing Vessels Policy Towards the Bilateral Relations between Indonesia and Malaysia Madjid, M. Adnan; Widodo, Widodo; Samudro, Eko G.
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 4, No 2 (2019): General Issue: Indonesian Politics
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

This study discusses the policy implementation by Indonesia regarding the sinking of illegal fishing vessels towards Indonesia's bilateral relations with Malaysia, especially those that occurred in Tarakan and Nunukan. Many losses from illegal fishing by neighboring countries made the President of Indonesia, through the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, took a firm stance regarding the rules of ship sinking to the accused ships that have been proven doing illegal fishing in the Indonesian sea. The Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries together with relevant agencies helped implement the policy which had an impact on the relationship between Indonesia and Malaysia. In this case, Malaysia is still in third place after Vietnam and the Philippines in the data on the number of vessels destroyed by the Indonesia. Malaysia is also the country with the fifth largest fish commodity production in Southeast Asia whereas fish consumption in Malaysia is ranked first in the region. Thus, the country faces obstacles in fulfilling the need for fish faced with Indonesian policies in addressing illegal fishing arrests by foreign countries. By qualitative methods, this research reveals the background of the existence and implementation of policies for the sinking of illegal fishing vessels and the impact of these policies on the Malaysian state. International system pressure, state power and other theories were used to help carry out this research. As a result, this study provides an overview of the relationship between Indonesia and Malaysia after the enactment of the policy. First, the Malaysian increase their fish trade and sea safeguard with Indonesia, both in the designated sea area and the gray area. Second, the government of Malaysia adopted the sinking ships method due to its mechanism that is considered effective and efficient in creating detterence effect. Third, both countries agreed to release poor or small fishermen who carry out IUU Fishing made between the President of Indonesia and the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

The Implementation of Sinking Illegal Fishing Vessels Policy Towards the Bilateral Relations between Indonesia and Malaysia Madjid, M. Adnan; Widodo, Widodo; Samudro, Eko G.
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 4, No 2 (2019): General Issue: Indonesian Politics
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipsr.v4i2.18767

This study discusses the policy implementation by Indonesia regarding the sinking of illegal fishing vessels towards Indonesia's bilateral relations with Malaysia, especially those that occurred in Tarakan and Nunukan. Many losses from illegal fishing by neighboring countries made the President of Indonesia, through the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, took a firm stance regarding the rules of ship sinking to the accused ships that have been proven doing illegal fishing in the Indonesian sea. The Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries together with relevant agencies helped implement the policy which had an impact on the relationship between Indonesia and Malaysia. In this case, Malaysia is still in third place after Vietnam and the Philippines in the data on the number of vessels destroyed by the Indonesia. Malaysia is also the country with the fifth largest fish commodity production in Southeast Asia whereas fish consumption in Malaysia is ranked first in the region. Thus, the country faces obstacles in fulfilling the need for fish faced with Indonesian policies in addressing illegal fishing arrests by foreign countries. By qualitative methods, this research reveals the background of the existence and implementation of policies for the sinking of illegal fishing vessels and the impact of these policies on the Malaysian state. International system pressure, state power and other theories were used to help carry out this research. As a result, this study provides an overview of the relationship between Indonesia and Malaysia after the enactment of the policy. First, the Malaysian increase their fish trade and sea safeguard with Indonesia, both in the designated sea area and the gray area. Second, the government of Malaysia adopted the sinking ships method due to its mechanism that is considered effective and efficient in creating detterence effect. Third, both countries agreed to release poor or small fishermen who carry out IUU Fishing made between the President of Indonesia and the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

Budaya Maritim dan Diplomasi Maritim untuk Kepentingan Nasional Hanggarini, Peni; Madjid, M. Adnan; Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu; Wiranto, Surya
Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2022): 134-255
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i2.50777

This paper discusses how pillars in Indonesia’s vision of Global Maritime Fulcrum (GMF) are interrelated, particularly maritime culture and maritime diplomacy. These two pillars need to be implemented as an entity concept. Previous literatures have mainly discussed how each of the pillars contribute to the realization of GMF vision. Based on the perspectives of International Relations theory, this paper explains how maritime culture can influence the formulation of strategy and implementation of Indonesia’s maritime diplomacy. The authors argue that the pillars of maritime culture and maritime diplomacy are reflection of the national interests supporting the GMF vision. Additionally, the embedded maritime culture in Indonesian society can have positive implications for the inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes of maritime diplomacy. If maritime culture can be managed, it would serve as an instrument of soft power, it would construct the national identity and it would drive the creation of regional security governance, maritime norms and regime that could serve as facilitating factors for the achievement of national interests through Indonesia’s maritime diplomacy. The pillar of maritime culture is the root of maritime diplomacy for achieving national interests.

Legal Reconstruction on the Use of Philantrophic Funds in Supporting State Defense Financing Efendi, Asral; Madjid, M. Adnan; Ahmad, Irdam; Toruan, Tahan Samuel Lumban
Nurani Vol 22 No 2 (2022): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v22i2.14462

The collection of public philanthropic funds, especially in financing the national defense sector, has not been clearly regulated, but in the Indonesian context it has considerable potential so that it requires regulations to regulate it. The purpose of this research is to find out how the financing of state defense is in the regulations that govern it currently in Law number 3 of 2002 concerning National Defense, Law number 34 of 2004 concerning the TNI, Law number 23 of 2019 concerning Management of National Resources for Defense. Next, make several alternative suggestions so that philanthropic funds can be used to finance the national defense sector within the framework of Law number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance and Law Number 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury.The research method in this study is normative juridical with a statutory and comparative law approach. With the results there is an opportunity to use community philanthropic funds to participate in financing the national defense sector with a grant mechanism that is still in the APBN mechanism. By looking at the large potential of community philanthropic funds, an ideal concept is proposed that regulates operationally and institutionally.

PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK PAPUA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEPEMIMPINAN STRATEGIS Ilahi, Muh. Ikram Nur; Sukendro, Achmed; Madjid, M. Adnan; Widodo, Pujo
Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/jkrk.v6i2.55728

Kompleksitas konflik yang terjadi di papua menjadi salahsatu alasan mengapa konflik ini belum terselesaikan sampai sekarang. Aspek kepemimpinan memainkan peran penting dalam penanganan dan penyelesaian konflik, termasuk konflik di Papua. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis upaya penyelesaian konflik di Papua melalui pendekatan kepemimpinan strategis, dengan mengkaji kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia dari era Orde Lama, Orde Baru, hingga masa pasca reformasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan konsep John Burton (1990) yang menekankan pada needs atau kebutuhan untuk memahami penyebab umum konflik di Papua. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif, yang memanfaatkan studi kepustakaan atau literature review dari berbagai sumber yang relevan seperti buku, artikel ilmiah, dan dokumen terkait lainnya. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan setiap presiden dalam menangani konflik Papua sangat dipengaruhi oleh faktor kepemimpinan dan kondisi politik pada masanya. Kepemimpinan strategis dapat menghasilkan kebijakan yang lebih efektif dalam penyelesaian konflik. Pendekatan strategis seperti dialog yang melibatkan pemerintah pusat, pemerintah daerah, masyarakat adat, dan kelompok lainnya dapat meredakan ketegangan dan memperbaiki hubungan di masa depan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa dalam konteks kepemimpinan strategis, sangat penting bagi pemerintah Indonesia untuk terus mengembangkan kebijakan yang responsif terhadap kebutuhan dan aspirasi masyarakat Papua, sambil memastikan implementasi Otonomi Khusus yang efektif dan adil. The complexity of the conflict that occurred in Papua is one of the reasons why this conflict has not been resolved until now. Leadership plays an important role in handling and resolving conflicts, including conflicts in Papua. This study aims to analyze efforts to resolve conflicts in Papua through a strategic leadership approach, by examining the policies of the Indonesian government from Orde Lama, Orde Baru, to the post-reform period. This research uses the concept of John Burton (1990) which emphasizes the need to understand the common causes of conflict in Papua. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive approach, which utilizes literature studies or literature reviews from various relevant sources such as books, scientific articles, and other related documents. The findings of the study show that the policies of each president in handling the Papuan conflict are greatly influenced by leadership factors and political conditions at that time. Strategic leadership can result in more effective policies in conflict resolution. Strategic approaches such as dialogue involving the central government, local governments, indigenous peoples, and other groups can ease tensions and improve relations in the future. The conclusion of this study is that in the context of strategic leadership, it is critical for the Indonesian government to continue to develop policies that are responsive to the needs and aspirations of the Papuan people, while ensuring the effective and equitable implementation of Special Autonomy.

PEMBENTUKAN DEWAN KEAMANAN NASIONAL (DKN), TANTANGAN, PROBLEMATIKA DAN MASALAH YANG DIHADAPI INDONESIA BESERTA SOLUSINYA Zordi, Furqan Abdul Rais; Sumantri, Siswo Hadi; Madjid, M. Adnan
Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Vol 7, No 1 (2023): Pebruari, 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jim.v7i1.2023.26-33

Dewan Keamanan Nasional (DKN) berperan sebagai penasihat presiden dalam menghadapi situasi darurat dan tidak memiliki fungsi operasional. Disisi lain, Pemerintah menerjemahkan istilah public safety sebagai keamanan publik, bukan keselamatan publik. Dikarenakan menggunakan terminologi keamanan publik maka dikhawatirkan akan terjadi pembatasan terhadap semua hak warga sipil. Pemerintah seharusnya terlebih dahulu mengkaji definisi keamanan nasional sebelum membentuk DKN. Hingga kini, belum ada definisi yang jelas terkait keamanan nasional lantaran belum ada undang-undang yang mengatur hal tersebut. Pembentukan DKN seharusnya dibentuk melalui RUU yang dibahas dengan DPR, bukan melalui peraturan presiden sehingga pengkajian yang dilakukan lebih terbuka. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi tantangan, promblematika, dan masalah-masalah yang sedang dihadapi di Indonesia serta solusinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi dokumentasi, studi kepustakaan, serta melakukan uji kredibilitas terhadap data yang didapatkan. Ditemukan kesamaan antara Wantannas RI dengan DKN di Indonesia, namun terdapat perbedaan mendasar jika dikaji lebih lanjut menggunakan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada. Pembentukan DKN harus mengikusertakan semua elemen keamanan nasional serta merujuk kepada cita-cita, tujuan dan kepentingan nasional. Melihat kondisi negara saat ini, pembentukan DKN dengan segera namun tidak terburu-buru harus dilakukan. Hal tersebut ditujukan untuk menangani krisis yang dihadapi Indonesia pada saat ini dan dimasa depan

Penetapan Batas Wilayah: Analisis Kritis Atas Sengketa Pulau Tujuh Antara Provinsi Kepulauan Riau dan Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung Junio, Malvin; Madjid, M. Adnan; Samudro, Eko G.; Setiawibawa, Rachmat; Uksan, Arifuddin
JUPEIS : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JUPEIS: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Jompa Research and Development

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57218/jupeis.Vol4.Iss4.2101

Sengketa batas wilayah antara Pemerintah Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung dan Pemerintah Provinsi Kepulauan Riau mengenai gugusan Pulau Tujuh merupakan salah satu contoh konflik kewilayahan yang berakar pada perbedaan penafsiran historis dan administratif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar historis, faktor yuridis, serta implikasi politik dan sosial dari perebutan Pulau Tujuh antara kedua provinsi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan historis, yuridis, dan analisis kebijakan publik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara historis Pulau Tujuh memiliki keterikatan dengan Kesultanan Palembang dan Residen Bangka, namun secara de facto dikelola oleh Pemerintah Provinsi Kepulauan Riau melalui pembangunan fasilitas publik dan pelayanan administratif di Pulau Pekajang. Keputusan Kementerian Dalam Negeri yang menetapkan Pulau Tujuh sebagai bagian dari Provinsi Kepulauan Riau menegaskan dominasi legitimasi administratif dibandingkan dasar historis. Oleh karena itu, penyelesaian sengketa wilayah kepulauan seperti Pulau Tujuh memerlukan pendekatan kolaboratif antara pemerintah pusat, pemerintah daerah, dan masyarakat setempat dengan memperhatikan aspek historis, sosial, dan ekonomi agar tercapai keadilan wilayah dan integrasi nasional.

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 7 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search