Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.63
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Law Reconstruction Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Probono and Community Service Journal
Rani Sri Agustina
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Status Tanah Hasil Reklamasi: Studi Empiris Pasca Pengesahan Peraturan Cipta Kerja Iwan Muri Susanto; Inge Dwisvimiar; Rani Sri Agustina
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol. 3 No. 3 September-December 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v3i3.21897

Abstract

Generally, pre-reclamation issues are related to licensing issues, which are one-sided legal actions (one-sided will of the government), as well as the issue of reclamation land concession permits, which are two-sided legal actions (government and entrepreneurs). Not infrequently regulatory policies regarding reclamation intersect with each other between the authorities of the central and regional governments. Meanwhile, post-reclamation issues are related to the form of control and ownership of reclamation land, including management rights and land rights obtained from reclamation results. This research study aims to analyze the licensing authority and status of land reclamation results to the ratification of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation and empirical studies on PT Gandasari Energi. This research study uses a normative-empirical legal research approach, namely combining applicable norms with data suitability in the field by comprehensively examining legal norms and a case study approach. The results of the study show that the reclamation licensing authority at PT Gandasari Energi is based on Law no. 6 of 2023, is the attribution authority owned by 2 (two) stakeholders, namely the Governor who delegates his authority to the head of the Office of Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services (DPMPTSP) of Banten Province and the Ministry of Transportation through concession cooperation with Port operator units (KSOP ) As the authority for port activities that have not been exploited commercially.
Back Matter Vol. 4 No. 1 Juni 2024 Agustina, Rani Sri
Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 Juni 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sjp.v4i1.26660

Abstract

Front Matter Vol. 4 No. 1 Juni 2024 Agustina, Rani Sri
Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 Juni 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sjp.v4i1.26659

Abstract

Implications of Cancellation of Notification of An Appeal Decision Canceled By The Chairman of The Serang District Court Desiliani, Melin; PS, Agus Prihartono; Agustina, Rani Sri
JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JURNAL HUKUM REPLIK
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/jhr.v12i1.9991

Abstract

As a case breaker, the judge is assisted by court officials in handling a case, both the Substitute Registrar who accompanies the judge at trial, as well as the Bailiff/Alternate Bailiff who carries out the duties of adjudication and plays an important role in the proceedings at the Court. Bailiffs in carrying out their duties often face several obstacles/obstacles. The most crucial obstacle is the delivery of relaas through the headman. Bailiff/Substitute Advocate in making notification of the decision if the residence or residence of the parties is known, the notification of the decision is delivered directly to the disputing parties (in person), the term in person can be extended again to include the next of kin in a straight line up and down below (parents and children) or husband/wife. If the residence or residence of the person is known but neither is he or his family, a letter of notification shall be submitted to the local headman/Village Head. Relaas Summons/Notifications (Summons of the parties and notification of either a decision or a reprimand), is a very important instrument in civil proceedings because without a relaas the judge's decision cannot be justified and is not based on law. This study aims to find out the procedures for submitting notifications of appeal decisions and the implications of canceling the minutes of notification of appeal decisions that were canceled by the head of the Serang District Court. This study uses a normative juridical legal research method with a statutory approach based on secondary data supported by primary data and analyzed using a qualitative juridical method. The result of this research is the cancellation of the minutes of notification of the appeal decision which was canceled by the head of the Serang District Court resulting in the minutes of notification of the contents of the decision having to be re-executed because they were not submitted legally and properly due to procedural-administrative errors. The cancellation of the minutes of decision notification is carried out to correct errors that have occurred in order to avoid the potential to hinder the process of implementing the contents of the decision at a later date.Keywords: Implication, Cancellation, Minutes of Notification of Decision
Legal Certainty Regarding the Cancellation of Property Rights Certificates From the Perspective of Land Registration Objectives (Case Study of Property Rights No. 55 in Tanjung Pasir Village, Tangerang Regency) Amril, Amril; Dwisvimiar, Inge; Agustina, Rani Sri
Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 03 (2025): Fox justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Edition 2025
Publisher : SEAN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Problems of a plot of land are often associated with problems of ownership of the plot of land. The state guarantees legal certainty in the ownership of land rights that have been regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The problem discussed is regarding ownership between the Deed of Sale and Purchase and the double certificate, hence the cancellation of the Certificate of Ownership Rights Number 55 of Tanjung Pasir Village, in the name of Etjah. The research method used is empirical with a normative approach. The data sources used are primary data and secondary data. Primary data is data obtained from parties related and involved in this study, namely the Tangerang Regency Land Office, the Tangerang Regency Land Deed Official, the owner of the Land Ownership Certificate No. 55/Tanjung Pasir. While secondary data is data obtained from literature studies. Based on the results of the study on the legal certainty of land rights, the Certificate of Ownership Number 55/Tanjung Pasir was first recorded in the name of Etjah which was transferred to Suha Bin Eneng and then transferred to Andre Lukas Simon. The root of the problem is that Vreddy is the party claiming the Customary Land Ownership Rights, so Vreddy filed a lawsuit against the object of the State Administrative Law (TUN) lawsuit. Thus, the Decision of the Serang State Administrative Court Number 10/G/2021/PTUN/SRG. dated June 30, 2021 in accordance with Article 110 of Law 51 of 2009 concerning the second amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts, the losing party in this case is sentenced to pay all court costs incurred in two levels of court, for which the appeal level is determined as stated in the verdict.
Co-Authors Amril Amril Asmawati Asmawati Dede Agus Desiliani, Melin Faridatul Fauziyah Inge Dwisvimiar Inge Dwisvimiar Iwan Muri Susanto Lukman Hakim Mochamad Arifinal Muchamad Fachmi Fachrezi Muhamad Uut Lutfhi Muhyi Mohas Muslih, Muhamad Palmawati Tahir Palmawati Tahir Suhadi, Aris Yosefine Yosefine