Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.066
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Bangka Belitung PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan Jurnal Riset Indragiri
Satrio, Ndaru
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum

 1 
Mekanisme seleksi dewan pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam perspektif cita hukum pancasila Yokotani, Yokotani; Satrio, Ndaru
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 13 No 2 (2019): PROGRESIF:Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v13i2.1452

Abstract

Pancasila sebagai cita hukum (rechtsidee) bangsa Indonesia. Kedudukan Pancasila sebagai cita hukum mengandung konsekuensi bahwa tatanan norma dan norma-norma hukum harus bersumber dari nilai-nilai Pancasila. Nilai-nilai ideal yang terkandung dalam cita hukum tersebut kemudian diderivasi menjadi seperangkat asas-asas hukum umum yaitu asas negara hukum, asas demokrasi, asas perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia serta asas partisipasi publik dalam sistem penyelenggaraan negara. Asas-asas hukum di atas merupakan dasar sekaligus pedoman dalam membentuk norma-norma yang berlaku umum dan asbtrak. Dalam konteks pembentukan norma-norma hukum yang bersifat abstrak-umum, asas-asas hukum harus dijadikan landasan dan atau pedoman. Dalam konteks Mekanisme Seleksi Dewan Pengawas KPK ini, digunkan dua asas yng sudah diderivasi dari Nilai Cita Hukum Pancasila yaitu asas negara hukum material atau negara hukum material atau asas negara hukum kesejahteraan dan asas pembatasan kekuasaan atau pebatasan kewenangan. Penulis berpandangan dengan adanya Presiden dan DPR dalam Mekanisme Seleksi Dewan Pengawas KPK jutru menggnggu sifat independen dari KPK tersebut, sehingga penulis mempunyai gagasan sebagai berikut: (1) pemerintah harus membuat panitia seleksi Dewan Pengawas KPK yang diangkat secara administratif oleh Presiden dan diberikan tugas yang independen dalam menentukan keputusn terkait ketua dan anggota Dewan Pengawas KPK , (2) penghapusan kewenangan Presiden dan DPR sebagai lembaga negara yang ikut serta membentuk Dewan Pengawas KPK , (3) Pembaharuan mekanisme seleksi Dewan Pengawas KPK harus dituangkan dalam suatu peraturan perundang-undangan.
Independensi Pengawasan Anggota Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Satrio, Ndaru; Toni, Toni
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 15 No 2 (2021): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v16i2.2726

Abstract

The problem in question is the independence of supervision of LPSK members. This is related to the mechanism for forming an advisory board and an ethics board that affects the pattern of supervision of LPSK members when it is correlated with the determination of LPSK members who are suspected of committing disgraceful acts. The analytical knife used is independence. The formation of this advisory board and ethics board must go through a selection formed by the President. The reason for the formation of the advisory board and the ethics board must go through a selection mechanism by the selection committee that forms the president, so that the supervision carried out within the LPSK becomes more independent.
Dialektika Unsur Merintangi Kegiatan Usaha Pertambangan Dengan Prinsip Demokrasi Haryadi, Dwi; Rahayu, Sri; Satrio, Ndaru
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.4063

Abstract

The element of "obstructing or interfering with mining business activities" is the focus of this article, because the editorial has multiple interpretations. Its existence derives two problem formulations, namely (1) What are the problems with elements hindering or interfering with mining business activities?: (2) What is the reformulation that reflects democratic principles? The analytical knife used to examine existing problems through democratic principles. This study uses normative juridical research methods. There are several conclusions related to the problematic presence of elements hindering or interfering with mining business activities, including: first, elements hindering or interfering with mining activities can be directed to actions that can be interpreted differently. Second, these elements can be directed to certain interests. Third, these elements can be subjective. Fourth, it is counterproductive to provisions for environmental fighters who cannot be sued criminally or civilly. The reformulations that are expected to better reflect democratic principles include: first, providing a more detailed explanation regarding the redaction of elements hindering or disrupting mining activities. Second, changing the editorial elements hinders or disrupts mining business activities. Third, remove the redaction elements that hinder or interfere with this mining business activity.
Co-Authors Anwar, Muhammad Syaiful Asista, Aruna Dwi Haryadi sari, rafiqa SRI RAHAYU Suntara, Reza Adriantika Toni, Toni Yokotani Yokotani