Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nagari Law Review Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Basri, Herlina
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Konsep Restoretive Justice Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan yang Berkeadilan untuk Korban Narkotika Pasca Pedoman Kejaksaan Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 Basri, Herlina; Jamal, Fikri; Ibrohim, Ibrohim
Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2023): Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v6i2.37479

Abstract

Penyalahgunaan narkotika terus menjadi momok dan perhatian yang besar, karena sampai saat ini berbagai jenis penyalahgunaan dan perilaku penyalah gunaan narkotika semakin bervariasi. Pedoman Kejaksaan Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Narkotika memberikan suatu sanksi tindakan (maatregel) yang diwujudkan dengan sistem rehabilitasi. Namun demikian, sistem rehabilitasi tersebut masih dihadapkan oleh berbagai tantangan, mulai dari konsep, pendekatan, hingga infrastruktur sarana prasarana. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji konsep restorative justice sebagai upaya perlindungan yang berkeadilan buat  korban narkotika pasca pedoman kejaksaan Nomor 18 Tahun 2021. Metode penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konsep diterapkannya restorative justice yaitu untuk menghindari dan menjauhkan seseorang dari proses peradilan sehingga menghindari stigmatisasi terhadap seseorang yang berhadapat dengan hukum dan diharapkan seseorang tersebut kembali kelingkungan sosial secara wajar. Penerapan keadilan restoratif ini sangat diperlukan agar upaya penyelesaian kasus bagi pidana narkotika yang baru pertama kali menggunakan dapat difokuskan pada pemulihan (rehabilitasi) atas pelanggaran yang dilakukan tersebut bukan lagi sebagai pembalasan bagi pelaku melainkan sebagai bentuk pemulihan. Konsep ini sesuai dengan prinsip keadilan restoratif karena dilakukan dengan berbasis pemulihan dan keadilan. Dan reformulasi penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif penghentian penuntutan dilakukan dengan memperhatikan dan dalam penerapan rehabilitasi dan Kejaksaan sebagai fasilitator dalam upaya rehabilitasi pelaku narkotika dengan Pedoman Kejaksaan Akhirnya adalah Kepolisian, BNN dan Kejaksaan akan terhindar dari hal-hal perebutan kewenangan terhadap proses rehabilitasi. Penerapan Restoratif Justice sebagai tahap penghentian penuntutan merupakan hal yang penting bagi pengguna narkotika yang baru pertama kali  menggungakan narkotika karena dengan penghentian penuntutan menggungakan keadilan restoratif ini hak-hak penyalahguna dapat lebih terjamin.Kata Kunci : Keadilan Restoratif, Perlindungan, Penyalah Guna Narkotika
Bankruptcy Legal System Reform in Settlement of Debtors’ Debt According to the Bankruptcy law Basri, Herlina; Santiago, Faisal; Zuwanda, Rifka; Yusuf, Hudi; Samiyono, Sugeng
Nagari Law Review Vol 7 No 3 (2024): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.3.p.567-577.2024

Abstract

According to Law No. 37 of 2004, bankruptcy is the complete seizure of a bankrupt debtor's assets, with the curator managing and settling them under the watchful eye of a supervising judge. There are several conditions for a debtor to be declared bankrupt, including having two or more creditors and not being able to make payments of at least one debt that is due and collectible and can be at his request or the request of one or more creditors. This article discusses the principle of distributing the debtor's assets if a debtor is declared bankrupt. According to Bankruptcy Law Regarding creditor provisions, in bankruptcy, three creditors are guaranteed compensation; the first is a separatist creditor, namely the creditor holding a material guarantee, then the preferred creditor, who has the right to precede because of the nature of his receivables by law is given a special position, and the last is a concurrent creditor—specifically, creditors who do not fall under the categories of favored and separatist creditors. After Article 2 paragraph (1) is explained, it is determined that creditors are concurrent, separatist, and preferential. Separatist and preferred creditors can apply for a declaration of bankruptcy without losing collateral rights to their assets on the debtor's assets and their right to take precedence. The debtor’s assets will eventually be distributed by the portion of the amount of the creditor's credit. This bankruptcy principle means that the debtor's property is jointly guaranteed for all creditors divided according to the principle of balance or “Pari Pasu Prorata Parte”
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PADA ERA SOCIETY 5.0 (Studi Kasus Toko Online Serba7ribu) Basri, Herlina; Prayitno, Isnu Harjo; Tajuddin
Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to understand how legal protection is for consumers in e-commerce transactions if a dispute occurs, whether consumer protection regulations accommodate problems that occur in the era of society 5.0 and how the effectiveness of existing dispute resolution can resolve these problems and fulfill a sense of justice. Technological developments are changing the order of human values and life, one of which is the development of the economy in the digital era. The need for laws that can guarantee the rights of parties in business in the current digital era, especially consumer protection, is increasing rapidly as problems become increasingly complex. However, the regulations governing consumer protection were regulations that were born long before digitalization. The research method used is empirical juridical with analytical descriptive research specifications. Data collection was carried out through field studies with observations and interviews with related agencies BPKN, BPSK, LPK-RI, consumers and business actors, and literature studies, data analysis was carried out qualitatively through deductive logical thinking. The Consumer Protection Law, as a regulation that specifically regulates consumer protection, was published in 1999 before digitalization, so it does not regulate consumer problems in digital transactions. Although consumers can use the Information and Electronic Transactions Law as a legal basis, the ITE Law does not yet provide technical regulations regarding consumer protection. Despite regulatory limitations, there are new innovations related to dispute resolution models, namely ODR (Online Dispute Resolution) which is a synergy between ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) and ICT (Information and Computer Technology) which is able to simplify the dispute resolution process so that it is not obstructed by space and time by cheap and fast. The author hopes that this paper will achieve results by publishing it in the accredited journal Andalas Nagari Law Review University and can put it in the form of a book with an ISBN.
Co-Authors Faisal Santiago, Faisal Ibrohim JAMAL, FIKRI Prayitno, Isnu Harjo Samiyono, Sugeng Tajuddin Yusuf, Hudi Zuwanda, Rifka