Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching IJoLE: International Journal of Language Education JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS AND LITERATURE JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) Studies in English Language and Education
Adnan, Zifirdaus
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Studies in English Language and Education

 1 
Responses to earlier literature in research article introductions: A rhetorical study in applied linguistics Warsidi, Warsidi; Halim, Abd; Kamal, Alfiandy; Halim, Nur Mutmainna; Adnan, Zifirdaus; Samad, Iskandar Abdul; Irawan, Andi Muhammad
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 12, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v12i1.35160

Abstract

Given that researchers aim to publish in prestigious journals, understanding the rhetorical organization of such publications is crucial. While this topic has been extensively studied, existing research has yet to explore how authors in reputable journals engage with prior literature. To fill this gap, the present study intends to analyze how research article authors respond to other earlier literature in their research article introductions (RAIs) published in reputable international applied linguistics journals. This study aims to achieve two objectives: to find out to what extent responding to other earlier literature is important in RAIs, and to discover what types of response authors employ in their RAIs. To achieve these goals, this study employed combined descriptive qualitative and quantitative approaches for analyzing 40 RAIs published in Q1 journals as data sets in the present study. Then, a new analytical framework was designed to respond to the above objectives. The results indicated that responding to other earlier literature is obligatory in RAIs published in reputable international applied linguistics journals. In responding to other earlier literature, authors employed three types of response: either extending other earlier studies, modifying other earlier studies, or establishing a new method, idea, or knowledge. This study offers theoretical contributions by expanding the understanding of how research article authors engage with prior literature within their RAIs. Its practical implications include guiding researchers on effectively utilizing prior literature to establish their research agenda when publishing in reputable journals.
Citation studies in English vs. Indonesian research article introductions (RAIs) in the history discipline Warsidi, Warsidi; Irawan, Andi Muhammad; Adnan, Zifirdaus; Samad, Iskandar Abdul
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 10, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v10i2.28343

Abstract

Citation studies in research articles (RAs) have been widely conducted worldwide, but such studies rarely compared English and Indonesian RAs, especially within the history discipline. Therefore, the researchers intended to analyze and compare citations in English and Indonesian research article introductions (RAIs) in the history discipline using a genre approach for the analysis and a descriptive qualitative approach for the reports. In this regard, 30 RAIs from both data sets were analyzed using two different frameworks: one is to identify citation ways and, the other one is to analyze citation types. The results revealed that English and Indonesian authors tended to employ descriptions more than other techniques when citing sources. However, English authors employed this technique more than Indonesian authors. In addition, both English and Indonesian authors also used a non-integral type more frequently than the integral counterpart, but English authors employed this type more frequently than Indonesian authors. Thus, these results conclude that although both English and Indonesian authors tended to assimilate their citations and avoid integrating them, English authors still employed this citation technique and type more frequently than Indonesian authors.
Co-Authors Alfiandy Kamal Andi Muhammad Irawan, Andi Muhammad arsyad, safnil Halim, Abd Halim, Nur Mutmainna Hasiyanti, Hasiyanti Iskandar Abdul Samad Maniam, Vegneskumar Nasihin, Ahmat Sahril Nur SYAHRIAL SYAHRIAL Warsidi