Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Analisis Minat Mahasiswa Terhadap Investasi Cryptocurrency Berbasis Teknologi Blockchain: Studi Kasus di Universitas Internasional Batam Javier, Felik; Faustine, Flavia; Richard; Suyanto; Goh, Vivienne
CESS (Journal of Computer Engineering, System and Science) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/cess.v11i1.69211

Abstract

Studi ini meneliti berbagai faktor yang memengaruhi niat mahasiswa Universitas Internasional Batam dalam berinvestasi cryptocurrency, meskipun luas diketahui pertumbuhan pesat dan risiko dari aset digital tersebut. Dengan adopsi kerangka model UTAUT yang telah dimodifikasi, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk analisa dampak Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions, Security, serta Awareness kepada Behavioral Intention. Data dikumpulkan melalui pemanfaatan kuesioner daring dengan Google Form sebagai alat yang diisi 349 responden mahasiswa, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan SEM pada IBM SPSS dan AMOS. Hasil uji data menunjukkan kualitas data yang memadai, sedangkan evaluasi model secara keseluruhan menunjukkan perlu adanya modifikasi lebih lanjut. Kendati demikian, pengujian hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa variabel Performance Expectancy (β = 0,228; p < 0,001), Facilitating Conditions (β = 0,102; p = 0,015), Security (β = 0,169; p < 0,001), dan Awareness (β = 1,204; p < 0,001) memiliki pengaruh signifikan dan positif terhadap niat perilaku mahasiswa. Namun, penemuan baru yaitu Effort Expectancy (β = –0,072; p = 0,030) memiliki pengaruh signifikan namun negatif. Temuan ini menawarkan kontribusi kepada wawasan adopsi teknologi kepada pengguna dan pengembang cryptocurrency dan menyoroti urgensi pendidikan komprehensif.
Dynamics of the South China Sea Dispute: Indonesia’s Position in Multilateral Diplomacy and the Enforcement of UNCLOS 1982 Sudibyo, Andin Wisnu; Richard
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i3.435

Abstract

The South China Sea constitutes a strategically significant global region due to its vital role in international trade, natural resource potential, and regional geopolitical stability; however, it also remains a complex maritime dispute area arising from overlapping claims by several states, particularly China’s unilateral nine-dash line claim, which is inconsistent with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982. Although Indonesia is not a direct claimant state, it possesses substantial strategic interests in safeguarding sovereignty, maritime security, and legal certainty under international law, especially with regard to its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the North Natuna Sea. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of the South China Sea dispute from an international law perspective by focusing on Indonesia’s position in multilateral diplomacy and the enforcement of UNCLOS 1982. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical method, this research is based on doctrinal legal analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including UNCLOS 1982, the 2016 arbitral award in Philippines v. China, official ASEAN documents, and contemporary scholarly literature. The findings indicate that while UNCLOS 1982 provides a clear and binding legal framework for maritime dispute settlement, its implementation faces significant challenges due to political considerations and geopolitical power dynamics. Indonesia consistently emphasizes the primacy of international law, strengthens multilateral diplomacy through ASEAN, and actively promotes the establishment of a legally binding Code of Conduct, thereby affirming its role as a normative actor contributing to regional stability and the enforcement of the international law of the sea.
The Dynamics of the Constitutional Court’s Authority in Determining Age Limit Requirements for Political Leadership Candidates Prasetyo, Rahmad; Richard
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i3.436

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia plays a central role in the national constitutional system through its authority to review statutory laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, and one of the most debated constitutional issues in recent years concerns the Court’s authority to interpret and determine age limit requirements for political leadership candidates, particularly presidential and regional head candidates. Although such age requirements were originally regulated explicitly by statutory provisions, Constitutional Court decisions have significantly altered these norms, generating legal and political controversy and affecting the structure of Indonesia’s electoral system. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of the Constitutional Court’s authority in adjudicating cases related to age limit requirements for political leadership candidates and to examine the constitutional and democratic implications of these decisions. Employing a normative legal research method with a statute approach and a case approach focusing primarily on Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023—this study relies on primary legal materials such as the 1945 Constitution, election and regional governance statutes, and Constitutional Court rulings, as well as secondary materials from academic journals, books, and recent scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the Constitutional Court, in this decision, has gone beyond its traditional role as a negative legislator and has assumed characteristics of a positive legislator by effectively creating new legal norms through progressive constitutional interpretation, thereby raising concerns regarding the limits of judicial authority, the potential shift of legislative functions from the legislature to the judiciary, and the need to reinforce institutional checks and balances to maintain legal certainty and democratic legitimacy within Indonesia’s constitutional and electoral system.