Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.285
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudentie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Unes Law Review Jurnal Hukum Adigama Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
R. Rahaditya
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 43 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Juridical Review of Minors Facing Legal Proceedings in Pornography Offenses Lidya Imelda Rachmat; R. Rahaditya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1021

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal perspective on children in conflict with the law in cases of pornography-related crimes. The primary focus of this study is on the implementation of Law No. 44 of 2008 on Pornography and the Juvenile Justice System in cases involving children as perpetrators or victims. The approach used combines normative and empirical studies with descriptive methods. The results indicate that although regulations are applied, there are challenges in field implementation, such as social stigma against children in conflict with the law. This study also highlights the importance of restorative justice approaches in handling these cases to minimize negative impacts on the child’s psychological and social development.
The Fulfillment of Diversion in Cases of Participation in Assault Resulting in Death by Children Merlin Theodor Handayani Samosir; R. Rahaditya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1022

Abstract

The increasing number of crimes involving children, the diversion approach is a major concern as an alternative in the juvenile criminal justice system that should be prioritized as mandated by Law No. 11/2012 on Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA), which emphasizes peaceful conflict resolution between juvenile offenders and victims. However, this process can be complicated when the victim's family does not accept an amicable settlement. Although peace efforts were achieved between the victim's family and the offender's parents, the difference in sentences between the defendants triggered dissatisfaction and violation of the initial agreement, posing a dilemma in the implementation of diversion. This study highlights the application of diversion in the case resolved in Decision Number 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Jmb, where the peace process between the victim's family and the perpetrator faced challenges, although an agreement was reached. This research uses a normative juridical method with descriptive analysis of legal sources, including laws, journals, and court decisions. The analysis shows that, although diversion is mandatory in juvenile cases, material compensation is not. Its success depends heavily on the willingness of the parties involved to reach a fair and binding agreement so as not to create dilemmas in its implementation. This study recommends refining the diversion mechanism to address conflicts arising from disagreements between the parties in cases of children in conflict with the law.
Analysis of the Judge's Consideration on the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 157/Pid.B/2024/PN Jkt.Pst In The Case Of Online Concert Ticket Fraud Malika Baby Natasha; R. Rahaditya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1107

Abstract

This study seeks to examine the judicial interpretation underlying the judge's rationale in Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 157/Pid.B/2024/PN Jkt.Pst, concerning the case of online concert ticket fraud involving defendant Ghisca Debora Aritonang. The main focus of this research is to understand how the judge handed down the verdict and how the verdict interprets the legal provisions regarding fraud in digital transactions. Using a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, the results of the analysis show that the judge's consideration in this decision is very in-depth and comprehensive. The results showed that the judge considered various legal aspects and facts revealed during the trial, ranging from the elements of fraud in accordance with Article 378 of the Criminal Code to malicious intent proven from evidence and witness testimony. In addition, the defendant's mental state and the social impact of the fraudulent act that harmed many people became the focus of the judge's attention. By emphasizing the absence of justification for the defendant's actions, the judge gave a firm decision that is expected to have a deterrent effect on other criminals. The legal interpretation in this decision reflects the application of the principles of justice and accountability in criminal law in Indonesia. It is hoped that there will be increased public education and awareness regarding the risks of online transactions as well as cooperation between law enforcement and concert organizers to facilitate safer transactions
Stigmatization of Delinquent Children and Those in Conflict with the Law Meliana Kartika Herningsih; R. Rahaditya
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 1 Juni 2025
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i1.56732

Abstract

This research examines Indonesia's legal framework through Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA), which implements principles of restorative justice and diversion to protect children from stigmatization. Using normative juridical research with a legislative approach, this study analyzes how criminal policies based on restorative justice can prevent stigma while providing opportunities for behavioral improvement outside the formal legal process. The SPPA Law comprehensively regulates the protection of children's rights, particularly rehabilitation over punishment. Diversion offers a humane alternative that prevents developmental trauma and stigma. However, its implementation faces challenges including inadequate understanding of restorative justice principles among law enforcement officials and continuing negative public perceptions of children undergoing diversion. This research proposes strategies to strengthen restorative approaches that better protect children's futures while maintaining accountability.
UPAYA MEMBANGUN KELUARGA BAHAGIAN PADA MASYARAKAT DESA TUKDANA KEBUPATEN INDRAMAYU Rasji; Kurnia, Ida; R. Rahaditya
Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/jbmi.v7i3.34686

Abstract

The people of Tukdana Village in Indramayu Regency have chosen the relationship of a man and a woman through marriage to become a family. A family consists of a husband and wife and can have children. Although there are still those who fail to maintain the integrity of their family, the people of Tukdana Village have tried to build a happy family. How are the efforts of the people of Tukdana Village in building a happy family? The TNI problem has been carried out by searching for data through empirical methods with technical interviews with community members during the implementation of community service. Based on the results of qualitative analysis, it is known that the people of Tukdana Village have created and implemented a happy family development program, through a movement to postpone the minimum age of marriage to 19 years, appealing to teenagers to finish school up to high school level, implementing an internship program for high school graduates, seeking the economic capacity of the community through opportunities to work as migrant workers abroad, conducting family development for young married couples, utilizing community service programs by lecturers and students to foster family couples to build eternal and happy families ABSTRAK Masyarakat Desa Tukdana di Kabupaten Indramayu telah memilih hubungan seorang pria dan wanita melalui perkawinan menjadi sebuah keluarga. Keluarga terdiri atas suami dan istri serta dapat anak-anak keturunannya. Meskipun masih ada yang gagal mempertahankan keutuhan keluarganya, namun masyarakat Desa Tukdana telah berusaha membangun keluarga bahagia. Bagaimana upaya masyarakat Desa Tukdana dalam membangun keluarga yang bahagia? Permasalahan tni telah dilakukan pencaian data melalui metode empirin dengan teknis wawancara terhadap warga masyararakat pada saat pelaksanaan pengabdian kepada masyarakat. Berdasarkan hasil analisis kualitatif diketahui masyarakat Desa Tukdana telah membuat dan melaksanakan program pembangunan keluarga bahagia, melalui gerakan penundaan usia perkawinan minimal 19 tahun, menghimbau anak-anak remaja agar menyelesaikan sekolah sampai dengan tingkat sekolah menengah atas, menerapkan program magang kerja bagi anak-anak lulusan sekolah menengah atas, mengupayakan kemampuan ekonomi masyarakat melalui peluang bekerja sebagai buruh migran ke luar negeri, melakukan pembinaan keluarga pasangan perkawinan muda, memanfaatkan program pengabdian kepada masyarakat oleh dosen dan mahasiswa untuk membina pasangan keluarga agar membangun keluarga kekal dan bahagia.
Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Anak dalam Menangani Kasus Penganiayaan Anak oleh Pengasuh Jolin; R. Rahaditya
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3199

Abstract

Hak anak ditandai sebagai aspek tidak terpisahkan dari praktik HAM, sehingga merupakan suatu hal yang patut dilindungi dan dijunjungtinggi. Indonesia sudah memiliki peraturan mengenai perlindungan anak, sebagaimana terkandung dalam UU No 23 yang dikeluarkan tahun 2002. Namun, pada faktanya di lapangan seringkali masih terjadi kasus penganiayaan terhadap anak, seperti halnya yang terjadi pada penganiayaan bayi berusia 1,3 tahun pada daycare di Medan oleh pengasuh. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran lembaga perlindungan anak dalam menangani kasus penganiayaan anak oleh pengasuh. Metode penelitian yang dilaksanakan berupa pendekatan hukum normatif empiris. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa kehadiran Lembaga Perlindungan Anak Indonesia (LPAI) adalah melaksanakan pemantauan dan evaluasi terhadap lembaga-lembaga yang menyediakan layanan pengasuhan anak, seperti panti asuhan dan daycare. Dengan melakukan pengawasan yang ketat, LPAI dapat mendeteksi potensi kekerasan atau perlakuan tidak layak terhadap anak.  Keberlakuan hukum terhadap perlindungan anak juga memiliki kaitan dengan tanggungjawab yayasan untuk dapat memastikan bahwa anak-anak yang berada di bawah perawatannya mendapatkan pengasuhan yang berkualitas, termasuk dalam upaya seleksi pengasuh dengan teliti dan pemberian edukasi/pelatihan untuk mencegah kasus penganiayaan anak di kemudian hari.
PENGGABUNGAN GUGATAN PEMBATALAN MEREK DAN GUGATAN ATAS PELANGGARAN MEREK Elisabeth D.A.N; R. Rahaditya
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1240

Abstract

Problems in registering a mark that is conceptually identical to another mark can be resolved by filing a trademark cancellation lawsuit. However, in drafting a lawsuit, the owner or its attorney must prepare the lawsuit correctly and straight to the issue. Cause lawsuits are often found whose contents are inappropriate, causing the lawsuit become vague and unclear. Thus, in the dispute between Buttonscarves and Umamascarves trademarks, the plaintiff was suing for cancellation of the trademark but asked for a stop to production, sales, and promotion of products from the trademark that were conceptually identical to its own; this claim can only be requested for a trademark infringement lawsuit. This research aims to analyze the combination of trademark cancellation lawsuits and trademark infringement lawsuits. This type of research is normative legal research accomplished with literature studies supported by primary and secondary data obtained from interviews and related legal materials. This research shows that mixing a lawsuit for trademark cancellation and a lawsuit for trademark infringement cannot be fulfilled because different parties are drawn as defendants. In a trademark cancellation lawsuit, the defendant is the registered trademark owner, whereas in a trademark infringement lawsuit, the defendant is the party who does not have the right or permission to use the trademark. Other than that, there are different demands in those lawsuits. In the trademark cancellation lawsuit, the demand is for the trademark cancellation, whereas in the trademark infringement lawsuit, the demand is for compensation or closure of activities related to the trademark.
Alasan Yang Meringankan Penjatuhan Pidana dan Dampaknya Bagi Masyarakat: Contoh Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 239 K/Pid.Sus/2020 Gunawan, Chyntia; R. Rahaditya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1729

Abstract

Di negara hukum seperti Indonesia, menaati aturan dalam bertindak di masyarakat adalah sebuah kewajiban. Namun tindakan yang tidak sesuai seringkali dilakukan oleh pihak-pihak yang tidak bertanggung jawab, terutama dalam konteks penyalahgunaan narkoba. Teknologi yang semakin canggih juga memperbesar peluang terjadinya kejahatan tersebut. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, Indonesia telah membentuk sistem peradilan pidana dengan memberikan sanksi kepada pelaku tindak pidana. Namun proses peradilan tidak selalu menghasilkan penjatuhan pidana yang sebanding dengan perbuatan yang dilakukan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif untuk menganalisis alasan-alasan meringankan hukuman pidana dan dampaknya terhadap masyarakat. Diuraikan kasus tindak pidana narkotika, di mana tersangka mendapat pengurangan hukuman dari 10 tahun menjadi 8 tahun setelah melalui proses banding dan kasasi. Alasan meringankan pidana antara lain pertimbangan hakim terhadap berbagai faktor, seperti upaya terdakwa untuk mengurangi berat ringannya perbuatannya atau keadaan pribadi tertentu, meskipun hal ini diharapkan dapat menciptakan keadilan, namun tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa hal tersebut mempunyai dampak. efek negatif. Konsekuensi ini mencakup peningkatan kejahatan, ketidakadilan dalam sistem peradilan, berkurangnya efektivitas rehabilitasi, potensi ancaman terhadap keselamatan masyarakat, dan berkurangnya pencegahan kejahatan. Mengurangi hukuman pidana juga dapat merugikan korban kejahatan, yang mungkin tidak puas dengan penyelenggaraan peradilan. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini mencoba mendeskripsikan dampak tersebut secara rinci.
Upaya Perlindungan Anak oleh Lembaga Perlindungan Anak Indonesia Terhadap Korban Pelecehan Seksual Majolica Ocarina Fae; R. Rahaditya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1851

Abstract

This research analyzes the efforts of child protection agencies in Indonesia to protect victims of sexual abuse. By employing qualitative analysis methods on relevant data, the main conclusion of this study is that child protection agencies face several constraints that limit their effectiveness in providing adequate protection to victims of sexual abuse. These constraints include limited resources, lack of coordination among agencies, low public awareness, limited access to protection services, and inconsistent law enforcement. Close collaboration between the government, civil society organizations, and all elements of society is needed to address these constraints and enhance child protection in Indonesia, particularly in the context of sexual abuse victims.
Quo Vadis Perampasan Aset dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Sebagai Pemenuhan Keadilan Terhadap Korban Mishael Joshua; R. Rahaditya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1880

Abstract

Tindak pidana pencucian uang merupakan tindak pidana yang semakin marak dan kompleks dan sulit untuk dibuktikan terkait kepemilikan aset dari tindak pidana tersebut. Bahkan pada tindak pidana pencucian uang, dimungkinkan terdapat aset milik korban yang mungkin tidak menyadari posisinya sebagai korban dari tindak pidana pencucian uang sebagaimana pada contoh kasus Indra Kenz. Sebagai negara hukum, pemerintah haruslah mampu dalam menjunjung tinggi upaya hukum yang difokuskan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi korban tindak pidana. Oleh sebabnya artikel ini berfokus pada bagaimana upaya pemenuhan keadilan terhadap korban tindak pidana pencucian uang melalui pengembalian aset milik pelaku yang telah dirampas. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif dan berfokus pada penalaran dan telaah atas peraturan perundang-undangan dan didasari pada studi kepustakaan dan pendekatan analisis. Sehingga pada akhirnya didapatkan jawaban pembaharuan substansial pasal rancangan undang-undang perampasan aset untuk lebih menitikberatkan keadilan kepada korban melalui mekanisme pembuktian terhadap aset milik pelaku tindak pidana pencucian uang yang telah dirampas.
Co-Authors AISYA VIJAYASHREE Chrysto Fransco Siletty Deren Adi Chandra Eka Aprilia Elisabeth D.A.N Grace Kezia Caroline Gunawan, Chyntia Helena Damai Ratih Ida Kurnia Jessica Jessica Jessica Jevano Tri Alexander Jolin Jose Adiguna Karen Abigael Pangkey Kevin Pramadani Lidya Imelda Rachmat Majolica Ocarina Fae Malika Baby Natasha Matthew Husada Meliana Kartika Herningsih Merlin Theodor Handayani Samosir Mishael Joshua Monika Romauli Manurung Muhammad Faiz Rizqi Nadya Enjelin Kusuma Pedro Sutanto Rasji Renald Saputra Reyner Darell Sidharta Rossellini, R.A Steffie Sandra Gloria Satriani Tamara Arruum Shafira Velia Audia Septian Vicky Vicky Yeremia Aprilio Yohanes Kevin Manik Yosua Hasudungan Wilbur