Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Kurniawan, M. Beni
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
KONSTITUTIONALITAS UNDANG-UNDANG NO 16 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PENETAPAN PERPPU NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG ORGANISASI MASYARAKAT DITINJAU DARI UUD 1945 DAN KONSEP NEGARA HUKUM (RECHSTAAT) Kurniawan, M. Beni
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is a normative study that is perscriptive in order to provide solutions to the problems of Civil Society Organizations in Indonesia. This paper study theConstitutionality of Article 61 and 62 of Act Number 16 of 2017 on Stipulating Government Regulation In Lieu of Law No. 2 of 2017 which regulates the Dissolution of CSOs if reviewed from the 1945 Constitution and the Rule of Law’s Concept. As a result of the research can be concluded that Article 61 and 62 of Act Number 16 of 2017 On Stipulating Perppu No. 2 of 2017 which gives authority to the government to dissolve CSOs unilaterally is Inconstitutional because Contrary to Article 1 paragraph 3 of Indonesia as a State of Law and Article 28 E paragraph 3 concerning freedom of association. And also there needs to be a revision of Government Regulation In Lieu of Law No. 2 of 2017 with still giving authority to the Judicial Boards (MA or MK) in deciding the dissolution of CSOs. It is also necessary to limit the time to the Judicial Boards in deciding cases of the dissolution of CSOs, to avoid an uncertain case and an inefficient time
Mewujudkan Keadilan Realitas dalam Putusan Penguasaan Anak Melalui Pendekatan Interkoneksi Sistem Kurniawan, M. Beni
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 25, No 2 (2025): July Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.103-114

Abstract

Child custody disputes are one of the absolute authorities of religious courts. In 2023 there were 1526 (one thousand five hundred and twenty six) cases of child custody disputes examined and decided by all religious courts in Indonesia. The problem is that even though the court has given a decision that is legally binding on the child custody holder, the reality is that many of the religious court decisions are not heeded by the losing party due to several factors, including hiding the child, taking the child away, or inciting the child, which has an impact on the non-executionability of the child custody decision. Departing from this problem, this paper formulates the problem of how legal regulations in Indonesia regulate child custody and how the application of the interconnection system in carrying out child custody decisions. This paper applies normative juridical research methods by examining related legal documents as the main source of reference. the author's findings that for the realization of reality justice in child custody decisions, the Court can adopt an inter-connection system by involving relevant to prevent non-executable decisions.
Mobilisasi Hukum dan Advokasi Kebijakan oleh Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil dalam Perubahan Batas Usia Perkawinan: Dari Judicial Review ke Revisi UU Perkawinan Zein, Reshandi Ade; Kurniawan, M. Beni; Subarkah, Alfianita Atiq Junaelis; Musdin, Rasyid
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 22, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - September 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v22i3.1492

Abstract

Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil (OMS) memiliki peran fundamental dalam melakukan mobilisasi hukum dan advokasi kebijakan terhadap perubahan undang-undang, dalam penelitian ini terkait pengaturan batasan minimum usia perkawinan. Ketentuan Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 yang mengatur batas minimal usia perkawinan 16 tahun bagi Perempuan dan 19 tahun bagi laki-laki mengandung bias gender dan diskriminasi terhadap gender tertentu. Beranjak dari fenomena sosial tersebut, OMS melakukan mobilisasi hukum dengan mengajukan judicial review di Mahkamah Konstitusi, hingga advokasi ke parlemen yang output-nya melahirkan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 di mana terjadi perubahan signifikan terhadap batas usia minimal perkawinan menjadi 19 tahun bagi Perempuan dan laki-laki. Rumusan masalah yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini mengenai pengaruh OMS terhadap pengaturan batas minimum usia perkawinan melalui proses judicial review dan advokasi yang dilakukan OMS terhadap perubahan Pasal 7 ayat (1) UU Perkawinan berkenaan batas minimum usia perkawinan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis-empiris melalui telaah terhadap sumber kepustakaan dan wawancara terhadap salah satu OMS, yaitu Koalisi Perempuan Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan konsep legal mobilization oleh OMS, temuan penulis bahwa pertama, OMS memiliki peran penting dalam melakukan mobilisasi hukum dengan strateginya dapat membawa isu batas minimum usia perkawinan untuk diujikan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi dan tuntutannya berhasil membawa perubahan ketentuan usia perkawinan. Kedua, OMS juga memiliki pengaruh kapasitas untuk melakukan advokasi secara formal dan informal kepada anggota legislatif untuk mengupayakan pembaruan Undang-Undang Perkawinan.
IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC TRIAL (E-LITIGATION) ON THE CIVIL CASES IN INDONESIA COURT AS A LEGAL RENEWAL OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW Kurniawan, M. Beni
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.43-70

Abstract

Civil case trial based on HIR/RBg takes months or even more than a year, which sets a bad precedent for judicial institution because it tends to be complicated, and closed. A proverb voiced, “Reporting the loss of goats instead of missing cows,” increasingly the public’s negative impression towards judicial institution. Responding to these conditions, the Supreme Court issued a Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2019 concerning Case Administration and Court Trials Electronically. The research questions, how is the implementations of electronic trial (e-litigation) on civil cases in Indonesia judicial institutions? The research method used is literature study, in particular normative legal research, which is descriptive analytical. PERMA No 1 of 2019 has provided benefits for internal judiciary and justice seekers. Where case registration is done electronically without needing go to court. The payment of court fees is simply by transferring to a virtual account and the summons of parties are carried out electronically to an electronic domicile. It is not just limited to that the trial is also carried out electronically, from the first trial until the reading of the judge’s verdict. However, there are challenges for the successful of electronic litigation from the aspect of legal substance, the electronic trial regulated at PERMA rule out HIR/R.Bg whose hierarchy is above of that PERMA. In aspects of legal structure, It is needed the completed infrastructure and human resources. As well as aspects of legal culture, the enthusiasm of justice seekers who use e-court services.
Co-Authors Musdin, Rasyid Subarkah, Alfianita Atiq Junaelis Zein, Reshandi Ade