Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Humaniora

POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF GETASAN COMMUNITY IN SEMARANG REGENCY ELECTIONS IN 2015 Mediatati, Nani; Nababan, Kristina Roseven
Humaniora Vol 10, No 3 (2019): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v10i3.6019

Abstract

This research aimed to describe the form and the level of political participation of the Getasan district community in the election of Semarang Regency in 2015. Data collection techniques were through interviews, observations, and document studies. Sample research amounted to 182 respondents that were taken from 13 villages in the district of Getasan, and each village was taken 14 respondents. While secondary data of literature studies and studies of documents were both derived from the contestants, the general election commission district, the mass media, and other relevant sources. There were two candidates for the regent and vice-regent period 2015-2020; they were Mundjirin with Ngesti Nugraha that supported by three political parties, and the second, Nur Jatmiko with Mas?ud Ridwan that supported by four political parties. The results show that the form of political participation in the community of Getasan in the election year 2015 can be listed into nine activities, such as participation in one of the political parties, the committee of elections, socialization the candidate, campaign, become a victory team participated in the procurement of polling stations, participated in the voting, participated in the security voting in polling stations, and participated in the process calculation of the vote.
CONFLICT DYNAMIC FRAMEWORK: RELIGIOUS CONFLICT ISSUES IN SPECIAL REGION OF YOGYAKARTA Nababan, Kristina Roseven
Humaniora Vol 10, No 3 (2019): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v10i3.6006

Abstract

The researcher analyzed the conflict dynamic framework of religious conflict issues in the Special Region of Yogyakarta in 2014-2017. The research used qualitative descriptive research. Data collection techniques were primary data through interviews, observations, and secondary data through literature studies. Data analysis included data reduction, presentation, and verification. The results show that the conflict escalation degree in these past three years commonly is at the mass mobilization. Public-influencing religious and social figures successfully de-escalate it. Moreover, structural factors are triggered by education and policy of house of worship building, religious preaching, and exclusiveness. Those are also accelerated by society?s aggressiveness. Actors of conflict, in this case, are probably mass organizations and migrant communities. The related government agencies to resolve the conflict, and active participation from religious leaders, public figures, police, military, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU - General Elections Commission of Indonesia), and Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu - Election Supervisory Board of Indonesia) are proven to have capacity to settle the issue.
The Dialectic for National Unity: : Religious Exclusivism and Multicultural Challenges in Indonesian Communities Nababan, Kristina Roseven
Humaniora: Journal of Indonesia Culture and Society Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v16i2.12422

Abstract

The research examines religious discrimination against Christian communities in Salatiga City, a location frequently regarded as a model of religious tolerance and diversity in Indonesia. The novelty of the research lies in uncovering discriminatory practices within a city that officially promotes interfaith harmony, thereby revealing the gap between public discourse and lived experiences. Using a qualitative approach, the research provides insights into how religious exclusivism manifests even within contexts celebrated for their pluralistic values. Data are collected through interviews with three key informants—SH, M, and U—who experience forced displacement from the X subdistrict due to their religious identity. The interview data are analyzed using the Miles and Huberman analytical framework to identify recurring patterns and themes. The findings indicate various forms of discrimination, including social ostracism, restrictions on property ownership, prohibitions on worship, and forced evictions based on religious affiliation. This discrimination emerges from deeply rooted beliefs that perceive Christianity as incompatible with predominant local traditions and practices. What distinguishes the research is its focus on the micro-level dynamics of intolerance and how these practices challenge Indonesia's constitutional principles of religious freedom and unity in diversity. To address these challenges, the research proposes a multi-stakeholder intervention framework emphasizing leadership engagement, public education, and interfaith dialogue. By integrating empirical evidence with practical solutions, the research strengthens scholarly understanding of the challenges faced by religious minorities in Indonesia. It offers recommendations for fostering genuine pluralism and enhancing social cohesion at the community level.