Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Politik Hukum Penguasaan Teknologi di Indonesia Masnun, Muh. Ali; Wardhana, Mahendra; Perwitasari, Dita; Lovisonnya, Intan; Hasyyati, Astrid Amidiaputri
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 16, No 2 (2021): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.31458

Abstract

Penguasaan teknologi menjadi salah satu kunci bagaimana sebuah negara memiliki posisi daya saing dalam percaturan global. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis politik hukum (arah kebijakan) pengaturan berkaitan dengan penguasaan teknologi di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan sejarah yang kemudian dilakukan analisis preskriptif. Hasil dalam penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dinamika politik hukum penguasaan teknologi di Indonesia relatif masih mengalami pergerakan ke arah yang makin baik. Meski demikian pasca diundangkan UU Cipta Kerja, semangat penguasaan teknologi menjadi “lumpuh” karena telah dicabut ketentuannya.Mastery of technology is one of the keys to how a country has a competitive position in the global arena. This article aims to analyze the legal politics of regulations relating to the mastery of technology in Indonesia. The research method used is legal research using a statutory, conceptual, and historical approach which is then carried out with prescriptive analysis. The results of the study indicate that the dynamics of legal politics of technological mastery in Indonesia are still relatively moving in a better direction. However, after the enactment of the Cipta Kerja Act, the spirit of mastering technology has disappeared because the provisions have been revoked.
Legal Certainty in Filing for Interfaith Marriage Determination in General Courts Hikmah, Nurul; Faisol, Syahid Akhmad; Hasyyati, Astrid Amidiaputri; Hermono, Budi; Puspytasari, Heppy Hyma
Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): April
Publisher : Laboratorium Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (https://uinsa.ac.id/fsh/facility)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mal.v7i2.443

Abstract

SEMA 2 of 2023, issued by the Supreme Court, is oriented towards standardizing court decisions related to registering interfaith marriages. On the other hand, SEMA 2 of 2023 has instead created problems, particularly concerning human rights. From the perspective of human rights, marriage is viewed as a personal right, and registration is one of the citizens' rights, meaning that the state must fulfill marriage. The author uses normative legal research, emphasizing legislative, conceptual, and comparative studies with other countries. The research results indicate that SEMA No. 2 of 2023 was issued to address legal uncertainty in the judiciary regarding diverse rulings on the validity of interfaith marriages by providing clear instructions to judges to reject requests for the registration of interfaith marriages. The legal implication of this SEMA is that interfaith marriages occurring after the issuance of SEMA cannot be registered with the Dispendukcapil without a court ruling as the basis for recognition, due to the non-retroactive nature of circular letters. SEMA No. 2 of 2023 not facilitating interfaith marriages legally in Indonesia as a concrete effort to clarify provisions that have not been regulated explicitly in the Marriage Law.
Halal certification paradox: legal inconsistency on pursuing innovation and halal correlation in Indonesia Atsari, Zahni Hafizh; Hasyyati, Astrid Amidiaputri; Bintang, Sindu Muhammad Maulana; Saputro, Muhamad Rizky Aulia
Journal of Halal Product and Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Advancing the Halal Industry: Innovation, Sustainability, and Global Impact
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jhpr.vol.8-issue.2.180-190

Abstract

As the country with the largest Muslim population, Indonesia faces multiple challenges in implementing an effective Halal Product Assurance (JPH) system. Halal Product Assurance (JPH) is key to maintaining public consumer trust in the products they consume. The Indonesian government has already passed a law on Halal Product Assurance (JPH), which is based on Act Number 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance. Although not yet fully implemented, this law has sparked debate regarding its potential impact on micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and the designation of the responsible certifying authority. This research employs a normative legal approach, utilizing secondary data. This research aims to examine and analyze the impact of Halal Product Assurance on the micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). The main issues are, first, whether the mandatory implementation of JPH constitutes a form of state intervention that imposes disproportionate regulatory burdens on MSMEs. Second, which institution holds the legitimate legal authority to issue halal certificates—the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Body (BPJPH) under the Ministry of Religious Affairs or the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI). The research contributes to the ongoing discourse on regulatory reform in Indonesia’s Halal industry by assessing the implications of state intervention and institutional authority   Keywords: Consumer Trust, Halal Product, MSMEs, Regulatory Reform, State Intervention