Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Kesaksian Non Muslim dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Curup Nomor 571/Pdt. G/2016 Nashoha, Ahmad; Yusefri, Yusefri; Wihidayati, Sri
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 5 No 2 November (2020)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1112.361 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v5i2.1837

Abstract

The focus of the study of this article is on the Decision of the Curup Religious Court Judge number 571 / Pdt. G / 2016, which received testimony from non-Muslims. The classical fiqh scholars have formulated that Islam is one of the conditions that must be met in order to receive witnesses or testimony in a trial. As for the non-Muslim witnesses, the fiqh scholars have different opinions. Imam al-Syafi'i flatly rejected it. Other fiqh scholars, from the Hanafiah, Maliki and Hanabilah circles, accept non-Muslim testimonies in certain cases and circumstances. This article examines two issues, first, what the judges consider accepting non-Muslims as witnesses, and second; how is the view from the Maqâshid al-Syarî`ah side. These two problems were analyzed descriptively qualitatively, using the content analysis method and the Maqâshid al-Syarî`ah analysis approach. This article concludes: First, the judge's consideration of receiving non-Muslim testimony in the Curup Religious Court Judge's Decision number 571 / Pdt. G / 2016 is due to the absence of Muslim witnesses. Second, in the perspective of Maqâshid al-Syariah, the acceptance of testimony from non-Muslims in the absence of Muslim witnesses becomes a conditional need so that the case process can be resolved properly and fairly, lâ dharâra wala dhirâr, leading to the maintenance of the benefits of marriage. When Muslim witnesses are not found (absent), the testimony of non-Muslims can be categorized as the benefit of the hajiyat level. namely the level of benefit needed to provide convenience and eliminate difficulties in implementing legal provisions.
HUKUM POLIGAMI MENURUT SITI MUSDAH MULIA Yusefri, Yusefri
JURNAL ILMU SYARIAH Vol 3 No 2 (2015): DESEMBER
Publisher : IBN KHALDUN BOGOR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/mizan.v3i2.20188

Abstract

Poligami merupakan salah satu masalah klasik tapi masih hangat dan nyata untuk dibicarakan. Karena isu poligami selalu kontroversial subur menuai pro dan kontra dalam kehidupan manusia, paling tidak di kalangan umat Islam sendiri. Bahkan Poligami dalam Islam menimbulkan hujatan dari kalangan nonMuslim dan mendiskreditkan Islam. Dengan berdasarkan pada dalil QS al-Nisa: 4 bagian 3, sekitar empat belas abad, opini ilmiah yang dominan atau misi berpikir berpoligami dalam Islam adalah sunnah dilakukan. Hingga akhirnya pemikiran baru muncul dan poligami digugat oleh para pemimpin reformis Islam, yaitu sejalan dengan periode kebangkitan Islam di abad ke-15 atau awal abad kedua puluh. Menurut Musdah Mulia, poligami adalah haram lighairihi. Kontan saja pemikiran hukum Musdah Mulia ini diprotes. Penelitian ini tidak dimaksudkan untuk melihat dan atau membenarkan pro atau tidak, tapi secara akademis akan menganalisis kerangka metodologis dari pemikiran Musdah Mulia.