Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Pagaruyuang Law Journal Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum
Marsitiningsih, Marsitiningsih
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Digital transformation: creating an effective and efficient court in Indonesia Amarini, Indriati; Saefudin, Yusuf; Kartini, Ika Ariani; Marsitiningsih, Marsitiningsih; Ismail, Noorfajri
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 31 No. 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v31i2.28013

Abstract

This article discusses digital transformation as an effective and efficient paradigm in court services in Indonesia. The Supreme Court has used digital transformation in court administration by developing an electronic court system or e-Court since 2018. However, procedural law has no legal basis related to electronic trials. The development of online dispute resolution is very fast, while procedural principles regarding due process and neutrality must remain the court's main task. In addition, establishing Internet courts involves three fundamental legal ethical principles: restoring the ceremonial aspects of litigation and creating risk management mechanisms between the legal and technological systems. This study aims to analyze the court's efforts to create an effective and efficient trial in Indonesia. A normative legal method was employed, incorporating various approaches such as the statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research results show that the digital transformation policy was incorporated into the 2010-2035 blueprint of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, which has brought about the need to accelerate digital transformation in the justice system. Settlement of civil disputes is carried out using an electronic court (e-court) application with an electronic litigation (e-litigation) mechanism. Meanwhile, the criminal trial was conducted through teleconference media. Still, they have encountered obstacles: limited facilities and infrastructure in conducting the trial, such as internet stability in various regions and limited courtrooms with electronic trial equipment. Need to improve infrastructure and improve the quality of human resources.
Perlindungan Hukum Karya Desain Digital Yang Dijual Pada Platform E-Commerce Afif, Ega Haidar; Marsitiningsih, Marsitiningsih
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 17 No 02 (2024): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 17 No 02 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v17i02.1284

Abstract

With the development of digital technology, creators can now use e-commerce platforms to sell digital design works. The ease of access and digital nature of these design works raises concerns about potential copyright infringement. Digital intellectual property, such as logos, illustrations and icons must be protected. The research aims to find out and examine the legal protection of digital design works so as not to be misused by other parties on digital e-commerce platforms and the legal efforts of copyright holders of digital designs to be protected. The research was conducted using normative method. The results show that digital designs sold on e-commerce platforms get protection against ownership of intellectual property rights both from economic rights and moral rights as stated in Article 8 to article 19 and articles 21 and 22 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and article 25 of Law Number 19 of 2016 amending Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning ITE. Preventive efforts to protect a digital design creation can be done by inserting a watermark on the digital design and registering the digital design copyright at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property. E-commerce platforms can act decisively against individuals who infringe copyright by giving warnings, imposing penalties, removing and stopping products to closing the accounts of copyright infringers. Repressive efforts to resolve digital design copyright disputes can be resolved through temporary injunctions, civil remedies, criminal remedies and arbitration.
An Analysis of Constitutional Court Verdict Number 28/PUU-XI/2013 on Law Number 17 of 2012 About Cooperatives Marsitiningsih, Marsitiningsih; Inayah, Wafa Nihayati; Putra, Ade Muhammad Syamkirana
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 22, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.2.3391

Abstract

Article 33 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and its Explanation which refers to the notion of a typical corporate structure because of the definition of cooperatives in Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Cooperatives, it turns out that the philosophy is not in accordance with the nature of the economic structure as a joint venture and the kinship-based principle contained in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Similarly, this understanding has apparently been elaborated in other articles in Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Cooperatives, thus making the rights and obligations of members by making the supervisory authority too extensively and a capital scheme that prioritizes material and financial capital that overrides social capital which is precisely the fundamental characteristic of cooperatives as a distinct entity of economic actors based on the 1945 Constitution. On the other hand, cooperatives are the same and no different from limited liability companies. This has made cooperatives lose their constitutional soul as an entity of typical economic actors for a nation with a mutual cooperation philosophy.Keywords: Cooperatives, Constitutional Court Verdict, Economy
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Musik pada Konser Komersial (Studi Kasus Once dengan Dewa 19) Kurniawan, Fredy Bagus; Marsitiningsih, Marsitiningsih
Pagaruyuang Law Journal volume 8 nomor 2 tahun 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31869/plj.v0i0.6214

Abstract

Kasus antara Once Mekel dengan Dewa 19 terjadi karena Once membawakan lagu-lagu Dewa 19 pada konser komersial tanpa izin dari penciptanya yaitu Ahmad Dhani. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganilisis bagaimana penegakan hukum di Indonesia dalam memerangi pelanggaran hak cipta musik dalam konteks pertunjukan komersial dan mengetahui hambatan dalam menegakkan hukum hak cipta musik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual untuk meneliti permasalahan pelanggaran hak cipta musik.Hak cipta berlandaskan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengelolaan Royalti atas Hak Cipta Lagu dan/atau Musik. Disebutkan pada Pasal 9 UUHC bahwa setiap pihak yang ingin membawakan lagu milik orang lain harus mendapatkan izin dari penciptanya dan jika melanggar akan dikenai sanksi sesuai Pasal 113 UUHC. Hambatan dalam implementasi penegakan hukum, seperti kerjasama lembaga penegak hukum yang buruk, kurangnya keahlian teknologi, dan kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat tentang pentingnya hak cipta. Penelitian ini juga menjabarkan penyelesaian melalui jalur litigasi maupun non litigasi, serta menunjukkan keunggulan mediasi sebagai upaya penyelesaian sengketa. Diperlukan adanya penguatan struktur hukum, sosialisasi peraturan, dan peningkatan pengetahuan masyarakat, dikarenakan masih banyaknya hambatan pada budaya hukum seperti kepatuhan masyarakat yang buruk dan toleransi terhadap pelanggaran hak cipta. Penegakan hukum hak cipta musik dapat dilakukan secara lebih efektif dan adil dengan menggunakan pendekatan yang terpadu. 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Dengan Jaminan Benda Bergerak Milik Pihak Ketiga Permana, Yudhistira Gilang; Marsitiningsih, Marsitiningsih
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 18 No 02 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 18 No 02 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v18i02.1345

Abstract

Lending and borrowing agreements secured by movable objects owned by third parties have become a complexlegal phenomenon,especially when there is a default by the debtor. In practice,many creditors suffer losses dueto ignorance or negligence in verifying the legal status of the collateral object. This research aims to analyze theform of legal protection for creditors and the legal procedures that can be taken in the event of default in theagreement. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and legal literature.Theresults of the study show that legal protection for creditors in this case is regulated in several legal provisions,including Article 1320 and Article 1365 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), as well as Article 15 paragraph(2)ofLaw Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, which gives executorial rights to creditors with thesame power as court decisions that have been legally enforceable (inkracht). the importance of the principle ofprudence, the validity of documents, and the involvement of notaries in strengthening the legal position ofcreditors. Alternative dispute resolution such as mediation, subpoena, and execution of collateral through legalchannels are important means of protection for creditors. Article 29 of Law Number 42 Year 1999 on FiduciaryGuarantee. Every form of settlement must be based on the principles of legality, good faith, and prudence(prudential principle), and payattention to the rights of third parties in good faith. Efforts taken by creditors dueto default in a loan agreement with movable object collateral are carried out through two channels,namelylitigation and non-litigation. The litigation path is a settlement taken through the court, this path is formal,procedural, and the results are binding aind have permanent legal force. Non-litigation settlement is a legal effortoutside the court that is valid according to positive law and based on the principles of freedom of contract andgood faith. Keywords:legal protection,creditor,default
Co-Authors Afif, Ega Haidar Inayah, Wafa Nihayati Indriati Amarini Ismail, Noorfajri Kartini, Ika Ariani Kurniawan, Fredy Bagus Permana, Yudhistira Gilang Putra, Ade Muhammad Syamkirana Saefudin, Yusuf