Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

RECONSTRUCTION OF A REHABILITATION APPROACH FOR VICTIMS OF DRUG ABUSE WITH COMMUNITY-BASED INTERVENTION WITH JUSTICE VALUES Kevin Krissentanu Winner; Milda Istiqomah; Bambang Sugiri
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4670

Abstract

The method of handling victims of drug abuse can be done through community-based rehabilitation with therapy methods using a psychosocial approach. Community-based Social Rehabilitation still faces challenges in its implementation. The purpose of this study is to reconstruct the rehabilitation approach for victims of drug abuse with community-based interventions with justice values in order to provide legal protection to victims of drug abuse and reform the Indonesian narcotics criminal law . The research method used is legal research with a statutory regulatory approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach. Based on the research that has been done, it is known that regulations regarding the rehabilitation of victims of drug abuse with a community-based intervention approach still require synchronization of cooperation between the National Narcotics Agency and Regional Governments. because the implementation of community-based interventions without involving Regional Apparatus Organizations causes suboptimal gradual handling programs for victims of drug abuse. In addition, there is an urgency to carry out reconstruction based on the principle of justice referring to the purpose of rehabilitation as treatment or care for drug addicts, so that addicts can recover from their addiction to narcotics.
LEGISLATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF ARTICLE 54 PARAGRAPH (2) OF THE KUHP CONCERNING THE LAW OF PARDON IN CRIMINAL PROVISION IN INDONESIA Debora Oktarina Sihombing; Yuliati; Bambang Sugiri
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4755

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP) introduces the concept of rechterlijk pardon or judicial forgiveness in Article 54 paragraph (2). This provision grants judges discretionary authority to release perpetrators from criminal penalties by considering the severity of the act, the perpetrator's personal circumstances, or the circumstances after the crime, as long as they take into account a sense of justice and humanity. This article aims to analyze the legal ratio and practical implications of Article 54 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code by reviewing the philosophical, sociological, and legal foundations of the birth of this norm. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory, case, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that this provision is a correction to the overly rigid principle of legality while also opening up space for judges to balance legal certainty, justice, and expediency. The implication is that judges have broader discretion to uphold substantive justice, including integration with the values ​​of restorative justice. However, without clear technical guidelines, this provision has the potential to give rise to subjectivity and disparity in decisions. Therefore, the effectiveness of the application of Article 54 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code is very dependent on the consistency of the judge's interpretation, the existence of implementing regulations, and adequate supervision.
LEGISLATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF ARTICLE 54 PARAGRAPH (2) OF THE KUHP CONCERNING THE LAW OF PARDON IN CRIMINAL PROVISION IN INDONESIA Debora Oktarina Sihombing; Yuliati; Bambang Sugiri
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4798

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP) introduces the concept of rechterlijk pardon or judicial forgiveness in Article 54 paragraph (2). This provision grants judges discretionary authority to release perpetrators from criminal penalties by considering the severity of the act, the perpetrator's personal circumstances, or the circumstances after the crime, as long as they take into account a sense of justice and humanity. This article aims to analyze the legal ratio and practical implications of Article 54 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code by reviewing the philosophical, sociological, and legal foundations of the birth of this norm. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory, case, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that this provision is a correction to the overly rigid principle of legality while also opening up space for judges to balance legal certainty, justice, and expediency. The implication is that judges have broader discretion to uphold substantive justice, including integration with the values ​​of restorative justice. However, without clear technical guidelines, this provision has the potential to give rise to subjectivity and disparity in decisions. Therefore, the effectiveness of the application of Article 54 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code is very dependent on the consistency of the judge's interpretation, the existence of implementing regulations, and adequate supervision.