Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.105
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Syntax Fusion : Jurnal Nasional Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Journal Evidence Of Law Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Advances In Social Humanities Research Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PENEGAKAN HUKUM DELIK PENYUAPAN DAN GRATIFIKASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Agil, Marwan; Maryano, Maryano; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1598

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of bribery and gratuity offenses and analyze the form of law enforcement against bribery and gratuities in corruption cases in Indonesia in the future.  The method used is the normative or doctrinal research method. In this study, the implementation of the bribery and gratuity offense (ius constitutum) applied is Article 5 paragraph (2) jo Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law No.31/1999 as amended by Law No.20/2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (PTPK Law) with the occurrence of simultaneous regulations (concursusu idealis), so that law enforcement both Police Investigators, Prosecutors, and KPK must apply article 12 letter a or b. The results of this study show that in several Court Decisions such as Decision Number 10/PID. SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI jo Decision Number 234 K/Pid.Sus/2009 jo Decision Number 286/Pid-Sus-TPK/2016/PN SBY, one of the articles that is often charged by prosecutors, namely Article 5 paragraph (2) compared to using Article 12 letter a or b, even though there is a basis for criminal ballasty, namely by using positions and joint regulations so that the right article to be used is Article 12 letter a or b
ANALISIS HUKUM PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG BERDASARKAN LAPORAN HASIL PEMERIKSAAN INVESTIGATIF BPK (PERKARA NO. 59/PID.SUS-TPK/2020/PN.JKT.PST.) Lawadinata, Alicia Avelina; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Achmad Fitrian
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 3: Agustus 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas analisis hukum terhadap putusan tindak pidana korupsi yang mendasarkan pembuktiannya pada Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan (LHP) Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK), dengan studi kasus perkara No. 59/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst. Fokus kajian ini terletak pada bagaimana LHP BPK diposisikan sebagai alat bukti dalam membuktikan unsur kerugian keuangan negara, yang merupakan unsur utama dalam tindak pidana korupsi sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 2 dan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Melalui metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dan studi kasus terhadap putusan pengadilan, penelitian ini mengkaji validitas serta kekuatan pembuktian dari LHP BPK, baik secara formil maupun materiil. Hasil Penelitian: 1.)Bahwa Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan (LHP), mempunyai fungsi yang sangat penting dalam kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi karena melalui laporan tersebut diketahui bahwa suatu instansi pemerintah teridentifikasi atau ada temuan yang diduga terjadi penyelewengan dana yang dilakukan dengan cara membuat proyek-proyek fiktif yang mengakibatkan kerugian keuangan Negara, dari hasil temuan tersebut kemudian ditindak lanjuti dengan audit investigasi untuk memastikan berapa nilai keruian keuangan Negara dan perbuatan melawan hukum serta; 2.)Bahwa dalam Putusan Nomor 59/PID.SUS- TPK/2020/PN.JKT.PST. Majelis Hakim, memutus dengan uang pengganti yang lebih rendah dari aliran dana yang diterima oleh Terdakwa, maka penulis tidak sependapat dengan amar putusan tersebut tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan yang diatur dalam pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf b Undang- Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Bahwa dalam kasus ini, LHP BPK menemukan kerugian keuangan Negara dan telah digunakan menjadi dasar pemeriksaan dalam perkara ini, Saran dari penulis adalah akan lebih baik jika ketika sudah ditemukan kerugian keuangan Negara ole BPK, tidak perlu lagi dilakukan pemeriksaan di pengadilan yang mana hal tersebut akan menimbulkan biaya-biaya tambahan lainnya, maka langsung saja dikembalikan ke Negara sesuai dengan temuan dari LHP BPK
UNCOVERING INTENT: REASSESSING THE ROLE OF MOTIVE IN THE PUNISHMENT OF PREMEDITATED MURDER IN INDONESIA Christine, Christine; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Teepapal, Tanawat
PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): May
Publisher : Yayasan Pusat Cendekiawan Intelektual Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56107/penalaw.v3i1.223

Abstract

The sentencing of premeditated murder cases in Indonesia has so far emphasized the elements of planning and the consequences of the act, but has paid little attention to the perpetrator's motive as a reflection of the degree of culpability. In many progressive legal systems, however, motive is considered important in assessing the extent to which criminal intent (mens rea) contributes to the quality of a criminal act. This study aims to reassess the role of motive in the sentencing of premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Criminal Code, and to propose an evaluative model that can be used to enhance substantive justice in Indonesia's criminal justice practice. Using a legal-normative method and a qualitative approach to twenty court decisions selected purposively (period 2018–2024), it was found that in 70% of cases, motive was not considered as a legal factor in the court’s decision. Motives were merely mentioned in the chronology without legal weight. However, in criminal law practice in Germany and the Netherlands, motives serve as the basis for classifying murder and determining criminal sanctions. This study developed a conceptual model that categorizes motives into three categories: rational-emotional, manipulative-opportunistic, and pathological, each with its own evaluative implications for sentencing. This study recommends that motives be integrated into national sentencing guidelines and incorporated into judicial training based on contextual justice. In this way, Indonesia's sentencing system can become more humane, fair, and aligned with the values of substantive justice.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBUKTIAN MENS REA DALAM TINDAK PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA Marsauli, Yopanus; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Ismed, Mohammad
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1696

Abstract

This research is motivated by the proof of mens rea in premeditated murder which is influenced by the approach of malicious intent and actions. The obstacles that occurred included the first instance court considering that the concept of men rea which priortized the evil intention was the first, followed by the perpetrator’s actions. This concept is adopted by the common law system which requires a long time process. These elements are alsa called dualism, while the criminal justice system in Indonesia adheres to mononism. The formulation of the problem in this research is: How is mens rea proven in premeditated murder according to the criminal code in Indonesia?and what is the concept of proving mens rea in premeditated murder according to the Indonesia Criminal Code in the future?. This research uses the Theory of Law Enforcement influenced by legal strucuture, legal substance, and legal culture and the Theory of Negative Proof, where judges can decide a person is guilty with at least two sufficient pieces of evidence and the judge’s belief that a criminal event has occorred. The type of research used by the author in this thesis is normative juridical legal research. The data obtained was then analyzed qualitatively to reach objective conlclusions. This study used secondary data from primary and secondary legal materials, analyzed descriptively. The results of the study show that firstly, the proof of mens rea in premeditated murder in Indonesia in court decisions still applies dualism, namely malicious intent and acts. Second, the Makassar court’s decision convicted a person of ordinary murder under the article on premeditated murder with the consideration of intent without planning. For the sake of the principles of legal certainty, justice and consistency in the application of the law, it is appropriate for the court to follow the decision of the Supreme Court which has permanent legal force. The House of Representatives is revising article 340 of the Criminal Code in the future regarding planning that is open to multiple interpretations. Third, the indonesian state still adheres to monotheism. Fourth, the concept of proving mens rea in premeditated murder in future actions and responbility
Corporations as Corruption Offenders: Challenges and Solutions for Restorative Justice-Based Punishment Kilikily, Nikolas Johan; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Akkapin, Supaphorn
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1447

Abstract

The criminal prosecution of corporations involved in corruption in Indonesia has yet to demonstrate substantial effectiveness, both in terms of substantive justice and the enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Although corporations are legally recognized as subjects of criminal liability, enforcement practices remain limited, and sanctions imposed tend to be formalistic without triggering structural reforms within the company. This study employs a normative legal and comparative law approach to evaluate the effectiveness of existing regulations and to propose a more progressive model of corporate criminal liability. The findings indicate that corporate punishment should include preventive, restorative, and internal restructuring measures, rather than mere financial penalties. Therefore, regulatory reform and the application of multi-level sanctions are essential to establish deterrence and ensure sustainable justice in combating corporate corruption.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun (B3) Munzir, Marinov; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Ismed, Mohamad
ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisplin, Maret 2024
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/armada.v2i3.1248

Abstract

Limbah bahan beracun dan berbahaya (B3) adalah sisa dari kegiatan yang mengandung B3, seperti industri, pelayanan kesehatan, dan rumah tangga, menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009. Pengelolaan limbah B3 memerlukan izin dari Mentri, Gubernur, atau Bupati/Walikota. Ketidakpatuhan aturan oleh penghasil limbah B3 dapat mengakibatkan pencemaran dan perusakan lingkungan, memerlukan sanksi administratif dan pidana sebagai efek jera. Penjelasan lebih rinci pada pertanggungjawaban pidana dan perluasan sanksi diperlukan untuk menekan dampak negatif pada lingkungan hidup. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian Yuridis-Normatif, dengan metode pendekatan dengan menggunakan bahan hukum pustaka adengan kata lain, penelitian kepustakaan (Library Research). Pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah studi dokumentasi yakni dengan mencatat informasi dari bahan hukum baik pendapat ahli, hasil penelitian maupun jurnal. Hasil penelitian bahwa Pertanggungjawaban pidana lingkungan di Indonesia bergantung pada asas kesalahan, di mana individu atau badan usaha harus bersalah untuk dipidana. Fokus konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap badan hukum terletak pada kesalahan dalam pengelolaan lingkungan, termasuk dumping limbah B3. Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 memungkinkan penuntutan dan sanksi pidana terhadap badan hukum yang mencemari atau merusak lingkungan. Meskipun badan hukum tanpa kejiwaan, pertanggungjawaban diterapkan berdasarkan hubungan kerja dan pekerjaan individu di dalamnya. Tindak pidana lingkungan diartikan sebagai perbuatan yang dapat berpotensi pidana sesuai regulasi lingkungan, mencakup "setiap orang" termasuk individu dan badan usaha. Penegakan hukum lingkungan, tahap akhir dalam regulasi kebijakan, menekankan pelaksanaan peraturan yang, jika dilanggar, akan dikenai sanksi sesuai tingkat pelanggaran. Strategi penegakan hukum diperlukan untuk mencapai tujuan kelestarian lingkungan dan pembangunan berkelanjutan sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009.
Upaya Pemulihan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Guna Mengoptimalisasi Kerugian Keuangan Negara Karinda, Frans Jomar; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Ismed, Mohamad
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol. 9 No. 6 (2022)
Publisher : SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27688

Abstract

Functionalization of criminal law in the context of law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption, both in terms of material criminal law, formal criminal law (criminal procedural law), as well as criminal implementation, still faces obstacles, especially regarding the asset recovery policy of perpetrators of corruption which has implications for execution of payment of replacement money in order to optimize the return of state financial losses. Through the evaluation stage, it is known at this time that the criminal law has not functioned properly in tackling corruption, such as in the case of executing the payment of replacement money, where the prosecutor as the executor often has difficulty in executing the convict's property to be confiscated and auctioned to cover all or the difference in state financial losses that must be paid by the convict. This is due to the fact that the current national law still has many weaknesses that create difficulties for law enforcers in recovering the assets of perpetrators of corruption, especially in terms of confiscation of assets of perpetrators of corruption, so that the return of state financial losses caused by criminal acts of corruption when this is not optimal.Keywords: Asset Recovery; State Financial Losses AbstrakFungsionalisasi hukum pidana dalam rangka penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi, baik ditinjau dari sudut hukum pidana materiil, hukum pidana formil (hukum acara pidana), maupun pelaksanaan pidana, masih menghadapi kendala-kendala, terutama berkenaan kebijakan pemulihan aset pelaku tindak pidana korupsi yang berimplikasi pada pelaksanaan eksekusi pembayaran uang pengganti guna optimalisasi pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara. Melalui tahap evaluasi, diketahui saat ini bahwa hukum pidana belum berfungsi dengan baik dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana korupsi, seperti dalam hal mengeksekusi pembayaran uang pengganti, di mana Jaksa sebagai eksekutor sering kali mengalami kesulitan dalam mengeksekusi harta benda terpidana untuk disita dan dilelang guna menutupi seluruh atau selisih kerugian keuangan negara yang harus dibayarkan oleh terpidana. Hal ini disebabkan, bahwa hukum nasional saat ini masih banyak kelemahan-kelemahan yang menimbulkan kesulitan bagi penegak hukum dalam melakukan pemulihan aset pelaku tindak pidana korupsi, terutama dalam hal perampasan aset pelaku tindak pidana korupsi, sehingga pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara yang diakibatkan tindak pidana korupsi saat ini tidak optimal.Kata Kunci: Pemulihan Aset, Kerugian Keuangan Negara
Normative ideas legal protection to witness and victim in criminal case Suganda, Atma; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Dewi, Ratna
Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 3 No. 11 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/ijoms.v3i11.945

Abstract

Legal protection of witnesses and victims in criminal cases is an important aspect of the Indonesian criminal justice system. This is due to the crucial role of witnesses and victims in assisting law enforcement and achieving justice for victims. However, legal protection for witnesses and victims in Indonesia still has weaknesses, with many cases remaining undisclosed due to a lack of adequate evidence. This study aims to analyze normative ideas regarding legal protection for witnesses and victims in criminal cases. The research method used is the normative juridical method. The data collection technique in this study involves a literature study. The data analysis used in normative law research is qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that normative ideas are needed to strengthen legal protection for witnesses and victims in criminal cases. These ideas include strengthening the legal foundation through expanding the scope of protection, strengthening protection institutions, increasing public awareness, reforming the criminal justice system that focuses on developing a victim-centered justice system, and the use of technology in legal protection for witnesses and victims. Through the strengthening of legal protection, it is hoped that witnesses can give important testimony without fear, which ultimately supports the creation of a fair legal system and provides effective legal protection for all Indonesian citizens.
ALTERNATIF PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DENGAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA BERJUMLAH KECIL Anugerah, Listakeri S.; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Ismed, Mohamad
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Maret 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i3.1012

Abstract

Alternative criminal liability that can be provided to the perpetrators of corruption in the event of State losses caused by a small amount but meeting some of the characteristics presented by the researcher. In Indonesia, there have been many examples of corruption cases where the state's financial losses are small, but they are still continued to trial. The imposition of imprisonment on perpetrators of corruption is currently considered no longer effective in providing a deterrent effect on the perpetrators. Basically, the victim of corruption is the state. The state which in this case experiences losses of state assets makes the state the sole victim who must be given justice as a manifestation of the purpose of the law. The state as a victim with the result of the loss of state assets, in the long term also causes misery for the community. The method used in this study This study uses descriptive analytical research, which is carried out with the main aim of providing an objective picture or description of a situation. With a statute approach, case approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, normative juridical approach. The research results recommend alternative responsibilities that will be imposed on perpetrators of corruption crimes amounting to small state financial losses as long as they meet the classifications that have been studied by the Researcher. The results of this study that on the impact of corruption practices on a small scale on the quality of handling cases for law enforcement and the quality of sentencing the perpetrators, as well as the recovery of State losses so that the state that has been harmed as a victim regain their rights that have been taken away by the perpetrators. Through the analysis of the literature and the study of several cases presented by the author, this thesis also identifies common patterns that occur, causal factors, as well as suggestions for handling them.
KONSEP NORMATIF SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PERUNDUNGAN (BULLYING) UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM Haryanto, Rudi; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Basuki, Basuki
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Juni 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i6.1415

Abstract

Bullying is a deliberate, repeated, and systematic behavior aimed at causing physical or psychological discomfort to others, often carried out for the perpetrator’s own amusement in witnessing the victim’s suffering. Bullying can take the form of mocking, insulting, making offensive remarks, or spreading false stories that isolate the victim or make them the subject of ridicule, leading to feelings of inferiority, fear, and distress. This behavior is increasingly concerning, as it affects various groups ranging from children to adults and can result in severe physical and psychological consequences, including fatal actions such as suicide. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of criminal law in addressing bullying in Indonesia and to explore future normative concepts of criminal sanctions that combine both repressive and restorative approaches. The research problems raised in this study are. the current concept of criminal sanctions against bullying perpetrators, and the normative concept of criminal sanctions needed to ensure legal certainty in the future. Theories used in this research include the theory of punishment and the theory of legal certainty. he research method used is a normative legal approach. This study uses a statute approach, a case approach and a comparative approach which in principle originates from primary legal materials consisting of laws and judges' decisions, secondary legal materials consisting of books, research results, articles and tertiary legal materials from libraries, articles and websites. The legal material analysis technique uses grammatical interpretation techniques. This study reveals that the current concept of criminal punishment for bullying perpetrators in Indonesia adopts a mixed theory that combines retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation. However, the legal framework remains fragmented and unsystematic, leading to legal uncertainty and inconsistent law enforcement. To ensure legal certainty and public protection, a specific and comprehensive regulation on bullying is needed, including both criminal sanctions and additional penalties such as account suspension, content removal, temporary social media bans, public apologies, restitution, community service, and revocation of certain rights. The study also recommends the establishment of anti-bullying response units in educational institutions and workplaces, integrated with law enforcement and relevant agencies, to provide early detection, reporting mechanisms, and appropriate follow-up for bullying cases
Co-Authors Achmad Fitrian Agil, Marwan Akkapin, Supaphorn Anugerah, Listakeri S. Aturkian Laia Basuki , Chandra, Tofik Yanuar Christine Christine Dandel, Lukman Syafri Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad Effendy Nasution, Fachreja Hasibuan, Fauzie Yusuf Ismed, Mohamad Ismed, Mohammad Karinda, Frans Jomar Kilikily, Nikolas Johan Kusuma, Filiasari Latif , Abdul Lawadinata, Alicia Avelina Marsauli, Yopanus Maryano, Maryano Muhammad Mustofa Munzir, Marinov Nainggolan, Marsudin Oktafianto, Wahyu Dwi Paparang, Santrawan T Rachmat Hidayat, Afif Ratna Dewi Rattanapun , Supot Romie, Romie Rudy Haryanto Saputra, Adji Suganda, Atma Supono Supono T. Paparang, Santrawan Teepapal, Tanawat Te’dang, Yonika Winner Tuasela, Bernadus Alfons Tubalawony, Agnasia Marliana