Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.509
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Syntax Fusion : Jurnal Nasional Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Journal Evidence Of Law Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Blantika : Multidisciplinary Journal Advances In Social Humanities Research Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
ANALISIS YURIDIS NORMATIF PERAN KORPS BRIMOB POLRI DALAM PENANGANAN KONFLIK PELANGGARAN HUKUM DI PAPUA OLEH KELOMPOK KRIMINAL BERSENJATA Dandel, Lukman Syafri; Maryano, Maryano; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i1.583

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of the Indonesian National Police Mobile Brigade Corps (Brimob) in handling conflicts of law violations in Papua by the Armed Criminal Group (KKB), which has been categorized as a terrorist group. Using a normative legal research approach, this study examines the legal basis, implementation, and challenges faced by Brimob in security operations in Papua based on Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police and other relevant regulations. The results show that Brimob has a strategic role as the National Police's striking force in handling high-intensity conflicts in Papua, through preventive, repressive, and recovery approaches. Legal protection for Brimob members in carrying out these tasks is regulated in legislation, but its implementation still has challenges. This study concludes that there is needs to increase capacity and operational support for Brimob and strengthen inter-agency coordination to improve the effectiveness of conflict management in Papua.
Criminal Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of Environmental Pollution in The Criminal Justice System in Indonesia Zaenudin, Aa Muhamad; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Maryano, Maryano
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v4i2.1675

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of criminal law in addressing environmental pollution in Indonesia and to explore the concept of an ideal environmental criminal law enforcement framework for the future. This study applies a normative legal research method to obtain relevant data concerning the issues under investigation. The data used in this research come from secondary data sources and tertiary legal materials. Additionally, primary data are utilized to support the legal materials obtained from secondary sources. The data analysis is conducted using a qualitative juridical analysis method. This research employs John Rawls’ theory of justice and the theory of law enforcement. The findings of this study indicate that, despite efforts to enforce criminal law against environmental polluters, the sanctions imposed often fail to create the expected deterrent effect. Law enforcement still encounters challenges, such as conflicts between economic interests and environmental protection, weak legal culture, as well as limitations in infrastructure and evidence gathering. To enhance its effectiveness, a more comprehensive approach is required, integrating restorative and preventive approaches along with the application of the principle of distributive justice. The restorative approach focuses on victim and environmental recovery through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, while the preventive approach, through administrative supervision, aims to prevent violations from occurring. Additionally, strengthening legal awareness through public education and enhancing collaboration among law enforcement agencies, such as the Ministry of Environment, the police, and the prosecutor's office, are essential steps in establishing a more effective and just environmental criminal law enforcement system.
Reconstruction of The Settlement of Misdemeanor Crimes by The Prosecutor's Office Through Restorative Justice Romie, Romie; Hasibuan, Fauzie Yusuf; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto
Advances In Social Humanities Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Advances In Social Humanities Research
Publisher : Sahabat Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/adv.v3i4.428

Abstract

Narcotics abuse remains a major challenge within Indonesia's criminal justice system, where a punitive approach emphasizing imprisonment still dominates over rehabilitation strategies. Although Restorative Justice offers a more humane alternative by prioritizing recovery and social reintegration, its implementation faces various obstacles, including regulatory inconsistencies, lack of rehabilitation facilities, limited understanding among law enforcement officials, and persistent social stigma against abusers. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Restorative Justice in narcotics abuse cases and propose regulatory reconstruction to strengthen rehabilitation-oriented resolutions. Employing a normative juridical method combined with an empirical approach, the research examines relevant legislation, court decisions, and field practices. The findings reveal a gap between regulatory frameworks, such as Law No. 35/2009, and progressive policies like Attorney General Regulation No. 18/2021, resulting in uneven application of Restorative Justice. Furthermore, limited infrastructure and social perceptions hamper recovery efforts. This study recommends harmonizing narcotics regulations, enhancing coordination among law enforcement agencies, expanding rehabilitation facilities, providing specialized training on restorative approaches, and promoting public education to reduce stigma. With comprehensive reforms, Indonesia’s criminal justice system can become more effective, balancing legal certainty with the principles of substantive justice, and offering a humane solution to narcotics abuse through a recovery-oriented model.
LAW ENFORCEMENT ON CONFISCATION OF CORPORATE ASSETS AS AN EFFORT TO RECOVER STATE FINANCES IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION Tubalawony, Agnasia Marliana; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto
Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis Vol 6, No 2 (2025): Social Sciences, Education and Humanities
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/ijsseh.v6i2.7339

Abstract

Asset forfeiture in corruption is an important legal enforcement instrument that aims not only to punish perpetrators but also to recover state financial losses. Perpetrators of corruption crimes are not only individuals but also corporations, both legal and non-legal entities. The research problems in this study are: how the regulation of corporate asset forfeiture as an effort to recover state financial losses in corruption crimes is formulated and how the enforcement of corporate asset forfeiture is carried out as a means of recovering state financial losses in corruption crimes. The theories employed in this study include law enforcement theory and asset forfeiture theory. This research applies a normative juridical method with an approach based on legislation, legal doctrines and relevant case studies. The results show that corporate asset forfeiture is a strategic measure which has to be a priority in the law enforcement agenda against corruption. Although Indonesia already has several legal instruments governing asset forfeiture, in reality, the implementation is still hindered by various challenges, such as regulatory, institutional and inter-agency coordination. Law enforcement often emphasizes the ultimum remedy approach, resulting in criminal sanctions against corporations to be overlooked and replaced by administrative sanctions. In fact, criminal prosecution of corporations is not only important as the state's measure to penalize crime, but also serves to restore state financial losses through seizure and confusion of illegal profits. This study recommends strengthening regulations through the enactment of the Asset Forfeiture Bill, enhancing the capability of law enforcement officers in understanding the concept of corporate crime and establishing a special agency to handle asset forfeiture professionally and transparently.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM DELIK PENYUAPAN DAN GRATIFIKASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Agil, Marwan; Maryano, Maryano; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1598

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of bribery and gratuity offenses and analyze the form of law enforcement against bribery and gratuities in corruption cases in Indonesia in the future.  The method used is the normative or doctrinal research method. In this study, the implementation of the bribery and gratuity offense (ius constitutum) applied is Article 5 paragraph (2) jo Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law No.31/1999 as amended by Law No.20/2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (PTPK Law) with the occurrence of simultaneous regulations (concursusu idealis), so that law enforcement both Police Investigators, Prosecutors, and KPK must apply article 12 letter a or b. The results of this study show that in several Court Decisions such as Decision Number 10/PID. SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI jo Decision Number 234 K/Pid.Sus/2009 jo Decision Number 286/Pid-Sus-TPK/2016/PN SBY, one of the articles that is often charged by prosecutors, namely Article 5 paragraph (2) compared to using Article 12 letter a or b, even though there is a basis for criminal ballasty, namely by using positions and joint regulations so that the right article to be used is Article 12 letter a or b
ANALISIS HUKUM PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG BERDASARKAN LAPORAN HASIL PEMERIKSAAN INVESTIGATIF BPK (PERKARA NO. 59/PID.SUS-TPK/2020/PN.JKT.PST.) Lawadinata, Alicia Avelina; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Achmad Fitrian
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 3: Agustus 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas analisis hukum terhadap putusan tindak pidana korupsi yang mendasarkan pembuktiannya pada Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan (LHP) Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK), dengan studi kasus perkara No. 59/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst. Fokus kajian ini terletak pada bagaimana LHP BPK diposisikan sebagai alat bukti dalam membuktikan unsur kerugian keuangan negara, yang merupakan unsur utama dalam tindak pidana korupsi sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 2 dan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Melalui metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dan studi kasus terhadap putusan pengadilan, penelitian ini mengkaji validitas serta kekuatan pembuktian dari LHP BPK, baik secara formil maupun materiil. Hasil Penelitian: 1.)Bahwa Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan (LHP), mempunyai fungsi yang sangat penting dalam kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi karena melalui laporan tersebut diketahui bahwa suatu instansi pemerintah teridentifikasi atau ada temuan yang diduga terjadi penyelewengan dana yang dilakukan dengan cara membuat proyek-proyek fiktif yang mengakibatkan kerugian keuangan Negara, dari hasil temuan tersebut kemudian ditindak lanjuti dengan audit investigasi untuk memastikan berapa nilai keruian keuangan Negara dan perbuatan melawan hukum serta; 2.)Bahwa dalam Putusan Nomor 59/PID.SUS- TPK/2020/PN.JKT.PST. Majelis Hakim, memutus dengan uang pengganti yang lebih rendah dari aliran dana yang diterima oleh Terdakwa, maka penulis tidak sependapat dengan amar putusan tersebut tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan yang diatur dalam pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf b Undang- Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Bahwa dalam kasus ini, LHP BPK menemukan kerugian keuangan Negara dan telah digunakan menjadi dasar pemeriksaan dalam perkara ini, Saran dari penulis adalah akan lebih baik jika ketika sudah ditemukan kerugian keuangan Negara ole BPK, tidak perlu lagi dilakukan pemeriksaan di pengadilan yang mana hal tersebut akan menimbulkan biaya-biaya tambahan lainnya, maka langsung saja dikembalikan ke Negara sesuai dengan temuan dari LHP BPK
UNCOVERING INTENT: REASSESSING THE ROLE OF MOTIVE IN THE PUNISHMENT OF PREMEDITATED MURDER IN INDONESIA Christine, Christine; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Teepapal, Tanawat
PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): May
Publisher : Yayasan Pusat Cendekiawan Intelektual Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56107/penalaw.v3i1.223

Abstract

The sentencing of premeditated murder cases in Indonesia has so far emphasized the elements of planning and the consequences of the act, but has paid little attention to the perpetrator's motive as a reflection of the degree of culpability. In many progressive legal systems, however, motive is considered important in assessing the extent to which criminal intent (mens rea) contributes to the quality of a criminal act. This study aims to reassess the role of motive in the sentencing of premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Criminal Code, and to propose an evaluative model that can be used to enhance substantive justice in Indonesia's criminal justice practice. Using a legal-normative method and a qualitative approach to twenty court decisions selected purposively (period 2018–2024), it was found that in 70% of cases, motive was not considered as a legal factor in the court’s decision. Motives were merely mentioned in the chronology without legal weight. However, in criminal law practice in Germany and the Netherlands, motives serve as the basis for classifying murder and determining criminal sanctions. This study developed a conceptual model that categorizes motives into three categories: rational-emotional, manipulative-opportunistic, and pathological, each with its own evaluative implications for sentencing. This study recommends that motives be integrated into national sentencing guidelines and incorporated into judicial training based on contextual justice. In this way, Indonesia's sentencing system can become more humane, fair, and aligned with the values of substantive justice.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBUKTIAN MENS REA DALAM TINDAK PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA Marsauli, Yopanus; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Ismed, Mohammad
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1696

Abstract

This research is motivated by the proof of mens rea in premeditated murder which is influenced by the approach of malicious intent and actions. The obstacles that occurred included the first instance court considering that the concept of men rea which priortized the evil intention was the first, followed by the perpetrator’s actions. This concept is adopted by the common law system which requires a long time process. These elements are alsa called dualism, while the criminal justice system in Indonesia adheres to mononism. The formulation of the problem in this research is: How is mens rea proven in premeditated murder according to the criminal code in Indonesia?and what is the concept of proving mens rea in premeditated murder according to the Indonesia Criminal Code in the future?. This research uses the Theory of Law Enforcement influenced by legal strucuture, legal substance, and legal culture and the Theory of Negative Proof, where judges can decide a person is guilty with at least two sufficient pieces of evidence and the judge’s belief that a criminal event has occorred. The type of research used by the author in this thesis is normative juridical legal research. The data obtained was then analyzed qualitatively to reach objective conlclusions. This study used secondary data from primary and secondary legal materials, analyzed descriptively. The results of the study show that firstly, the proof of mens rea in premeditated murder in Indonesia in court decisions still applies dualism, namely malicious intent and acts. Second, the Makassar court’s decision convicted a person of ordinary murder under the article on premeditated murder with the consideration of intent without planning. For the sake of the principles of legal certainty, justice and consistency in the application of the law, it is appropriate for the court to follow the decision of the Supreme Court which has permanent legal force. The House of Representatives is revising article 340 of the Criminal Code in the future regarding planning that is open to multiple interpretations. Third, the indonesian state still adheres to monotheism. Fourth, the concept of proving mens rea in premeditated murder in future actions and responbility
Corporations as Corruption Offenders: Challenges and Solutions for Restorative Justice-Based Punishment Kilikily, Nikolas Johan; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Akkapin, Supaphorn
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1447

Abstract

The criminal prosecution of corporations involved in corruption in Indonesia has yet to demonstrate substantial effectiveness, both in terms of substantive justice and the enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Although corporations are legally recognized as subjects of criminal liability, enforcement practices remain limited, and sanctions imposed tend to be formalistic without triggering structural reforms within the company. This study employs a normative legal and comparative law approach to evaluate the effectiveness of existing regulations and to propose a more progressive model of corporate criminal liability. The findings indicate that corporate punishment should include preventive, restorative, and internal restructuring measures, rather than mere financial penalties. Therefore, regulatory reform and the application of multi-level sanctions are essential to establish deterrence and ensure sustainable justice in combating corporate corruption.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun (B3) Munzir, Marinov; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Ismed, Mohamad
ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisplin, Maret 2024
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/armada.v2i3.1248

Abstract

Limbah bahan beracun dan berbahaya (B3) adalah sisa dari kegiatan yang mengandung B3, seperti industri, pelayanan kesehatan, dan rumah tangga, menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009. Pengelolaan limbah B3 memerlukan izin dari Mentri, Gubernur, atau Bupati/Walikota. Ketidakpatuhan aturan oleh penghasil limbah B3 dapat mengakibatkan pencemaran dan perusakan lingkungan, memerlukan sanksi administratif dan pidana sebagai efek jera. Penjelasan lebih rinci pada pertanggungjawaban pidana dan perluasan sanksi diperlukan untuk menekan dampak negatif pada lingkungan hidup. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian Yuridis-Normatif, dengan metode pendekatan dengan menggunakan bahan hukum pustaka adengan kata lain, penelitian kepustakaan (Library Research). Pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah studi dokumentasi yakni dengan mencatat informasi dari bahan hukum baik pendapat ahli, hasil penelitian maupun jurnal. Hasil penelitian bahwa Pertanggungjawaban pidana lingkungan di Indonesia bergantung pada asas kesalahan, di mana individu atau badan usaha harus bersalah untuk dipidana. Fokus konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap badan hukum terletak pada kesalahan dalam pengelolaan lingkungan, termasuk dumping limbah B3. Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 memungkinkan penuntutan dan sanksi pidana terhadap badan hukum yang mencemari atau merusak lingkungan. Meskipun badan hukum tanpa kejiwaan, pertanggungjawaban diterapkan berdasarkan hubungan kerja dan pekerjaan individu di dalamnya. Tindak pidana lingkungan diartikan sebagai perbuatan yang dapat berpotensi pidana sesuai regulasi lingkungan, mencakup "setiap orang" termasuk individu dan badan usaha. Penegakan hukum lingkungan, tahap akhir dalam regulasi kebijakan, menekankan pelaksanaan peraturan yang, jika dilanggar, akan dikenai sanksi sesuai tingkat pelanggaran. Strategi penegakan hukum diperlukan untuk mencapai tujuan kelestarian lingkungan dan pembangunan berkelanjutan sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009.
Co-Authors Achmad Fitrian Agil, Marwan Akkapin, Supaphorn Anugerah, Listakeri S. Basuki , Chandra, Tofik Yanuar Christine Christine Dandel, Lukman Syafri Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad Effendy Nasution, Fachreja Hasibuan, Fauzie Yusuf Ismed, Mohamad Ismed, Mohammad Karinda, Frans Jomar Kilikily, Nikolas Johan Kusuma, Filiasari Laia, Aturkian Lawadinata, Alicia Avelina Marsauli, Yopanus Maryano, Maryano Muhamad, Fadel Muhammad Mustofa Munzir, Marinov Nainggolan, Marsudin Oktafianto, Wahyu Dwi Paparang, Santrawan T Ratna Dewi Rattanapun , Supot Romie, Romie Rudy Haryanto Saputra, Adji Sibero, Sari Maharani Tarigan Suganda, Atma Supono Supono T. Paparang, Santrawan Teepapal, Tanawat Te’dang, Yonika Winner Tuasela, Bernadus Alfons Tubalawony, Agnasia Marliana Zaenudin, Aa Muhamad