Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics (JLCA)

The Surabaya District Court judge's Ruling in Gregorius Ronald Tannur's Trial Resulted in His Acquittal of the Murder Charge Pasaribu, Roy Ronaldo M.; Esther, July; Sidauruk, Jinner
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): February 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v4i1.13846

Abstract

This study examines Gregorius Ronald Tannur's acquittal in a murder case (verdict number 454/Pid.B/2024/PN Sby) and whether it complies with Indonesian legal certainty and justice criteria. Examining the judge's use of legal reasoning in the ruling critically is the aim of this study. Using a normative legal research approach, this study looks at secondary sources in addition to fundamental legal texts like court decisions and the Criminal Code. The findings demonstrate that the judge's decision ignored crucial evidence, such as the visum et repertum detailing the victim's injuries and CCTV footage implicating the defendant. The judge's assertion that the defendant was innocent and had made an effort to help the victim did not align with the evidence that was given throughout the trial. The integrity of the legal system and the possible impact of outside influences on court rulings are seriously called into question by this disparity.Reforming court procedures and enforcing stronger sanctions against judge corruption are crucial for regaining public trust and guaranteeing just and equitable outcomes within the legal system.
Tokopedia's Legal Responsibility to Consumers for Non-Compliance of Electronic Goods in the Online Trading System Ginting, Meilani Amanda; Sidauruk, Jinner; Gultom, Meli Hertati
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v4i3.15145

Abstract

This study discusses Tokopedia's legal responsibility to consumers for the non-conformity of electronic goods in the online trading system. Although regulations regarding consumer protection have been established, there are still losses incurred from e-commerce platforms that do not provide legal accountability in accordance with the laws and regulations. Consumers often experience losses due to products received that do not match the product descriptions made by businesses on Tokopedia. Although there are regulations governing consumer protection, such as Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE Law), many consumers still suffer losses due to the inadequate supervision and dispute resolution systems provided by the platform. This study employs a normative legal method with a regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings indicate that Tokopedia bears civil, administrative, and in certain circumstances criminal legal liability, and that consumers have the right to pursue legal action both through litigation and non-litigation means. An evaluation and reformulation of the system are needed to strengthen consumers' position within the e-commerce ecosystem.