Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Melalui Harmonisasi Hukum Agraria dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Desa Popaya Bakung, Dolot Alhasni; Apripari, Apripari; Hadju, Zainal Abdul Aziz; Kamba, Sri Nanang Meiske; Thalib, Mutia Cherawaty; Mantali, Avelia Rahmah Y; Sarson, Moh Taufiq Zulfikar
Jurnal Abdidas Vol. 5 No. 5 (2024): October 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/abdidas.v5i5.1033

Abstract

Pengabdian masyarakat bertujuan untuk membantu masyarakat lokal memahami dan mengatasi sengketa tanah waris yang kerap terjadi di wilayah mereka. Program ini dimulai dengan observasi lapangan untuk mengidentifikasi pola-pola konflik dan pendekatan penyelesaian yang ada, diikuti oleh penyuluhan hukum yang melibatkan dosen fakultas hukum dan tokoh adat. Metode dialog interaktif digunakan untuk mendorong partisipasi aktif dari 40 peserta, termasuk pemerintah desa, masyarakat, dan mahasiswa. Selain itu, pendampingan langsung diberikan kepada warga yang terlibat dalam sengketa tanah waris untuk membantu mereka memahami proses hukum formal dan mediasi adat. Monitoring dan evaluasi menggunakan aplikasi Google Forms dilakukan untuk mengukur tingkat kepuasan dan pemahaman masyarakat, yang hasilnya menjadi bahan evaluasi untuk perbaikan program di masa depan. Dengan pendekatan yang menggabungkan hukum formal dan kearifan lokal, program ini berupaya menciptakan solusi yang berkelanjutan dan harmonis dalam penyelesaian sengketa tanah waris. Solusi berkelanjutan dalam penyelesaian sengketa tanah waris di Desa Popaya didasarkan pada penguatan pemahaman masyarakat terhadap hukum agraria dan nilai-nilai adat yang berlaku. Dengan memberikan penyuluhan yang komprehensif, masyarakat diharapkan dapat mengenali hak-hak mereka sebagai ahli waris serta memahami langkah-langkah hukum yang perlu diambil untuk menyelesaikan konflik secara damai
Building legal protection of land borders in the management of people-based economy Bakung, Dolot Alhasni; Hadju, Zainal Abdul Aziz
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i2.1016

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal protection of coastal boundary land within the framework of people-based economic management in Tomini Bay. Based on normative legal research methods, the study examined the 1945 Constitution Article 33, the 1960 Law, the Spatial Planning Law, Law 27/2007 jo. Law 1/2014, Presidential Regulation 51/2016 on coastal boundary boundaries, and Law 32/2009 on PPLH, to map the gap between norms and practices. The results of the analysis show three main problems: (1) weak implementation and enforcement of the law on violations of border utilization; (2) conflicts of control and ownership due to unclear land status, lack of mapping, and certification; and (3) unsustainable exploitation of resources that damages coastal ecosystems and threatens livelihoods. This study recommends strengthening legal certainty through participatory mapping and social certification, integrating national law with local wisdom (customary deliberation/mediation), and co-management models involving the government, community, and private sector. Thus, the Indonesian border land can be managed fairly, provide certainty of rights, and sustainably support coastal welfare.
The Indonesian economic Constitution from the perspective of Franz Böhm and Walter Eucken for a just Market Elfikri, Nurul Fazri; Kadir, Muhamad Khairun Kurniawan; Muhtar, Mohamad Hidayat; Piyo, Sofyan; Amrain, Fitran; Hadju, Zainal Abdul Aziz
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i2.4769

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the implementation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution through the framework of Ordnungspolitik developed by Franz Böhm and Walter Eucken. The study is grounded in the existence of imbalances in the normative, institutional, and functional dimensions of Indonesia’s economic system, which hinder the realization of the principles of solidarity and social justice. This study uses a normative legal methodology with a conceptual and comparative approach to legal thought. The analysis examines the comprehensive text of the amendments to the 1945 Constitution, sectoral regulations (such as the Job Creation Law and the Mining and Energy Law), as well as Constitutional Court rulings related to the economy. Data is analyzed qualitatively to align the principles of the German economic order (Ordoliberalism) with the values of the Indonesian Constitution. The novelty of this study lies in offering a new interpretive model for Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution by positioning the state as the architect of the market order (rather than merely a passive actor or regulator). Its innovation lies in integrating the substantive rule of law of Ordnungspolitik to limit the concentration of private economic power, which often distorts the constitutional mandate. The results show that Ordnungspolitik provides operational instruments for Indonesia to achieve distributive justice through two main channels: (1) strengthening the independence of competition oversight agencies to the level of constitutional institutions, and (2) codifying economic laws that guarantee market access rights for small businesses. This interpretation shifts the paradigm of Article 33 from mere symbolism regarding “cooperatives” to a binding norm that obligates the state to undertake structural interventions to maintain market integrity. The conclusion is that integrating the principles of Ordnungspolitik into the national legal system can serve as a solution to Indonesia’s economic institutional failures. This study recommends restructuring economic public policy to prioritize healthy competition and the protection of social rights as an inseparable legal order.