Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.961
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tadulako Law Review Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Priviet Social Sciences Journal TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal Verdict: Journal of Law Science Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial
Madinar, Madinar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
AUTHORITY OF SUPERVISORY APPARATUS INTERNAL GOVERNMENT OR APIP IN DETERMINING STATE LOSSES DUE TO CORRUPTION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS Nurmayani, Nurmayani; Madinar, Madinar; Febbiazka, Karmila
Tadulako Law Review Vol 5, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Tadulako University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This time, there is often debate between two financial supervisory institutions, namely between APIP (Supervisory Apparatus Internal Government) and BPK (Financial Audit Institutions) relating to the existence of the same authority in these two supervisory institutions. This authority is related to the calculation of state losses as regulated in Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 31 / PUUX / 2012 related to testing Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission or the KPK against the Indonesia Constitution 1945 or UUD 1945. The decision states that the KPK can not only coordinate with the BPK and BPKP (Supervisory Financial and Development) in terms of proof of corruption but can also coordinate with other agencies, it can even prove itself apart from the findings of the BKP and BPKP. Based on this background, the problem in this research is how is the authority of APIP in calculating state losses due to corruption in Local Government agencies? The problem approach in this research is normative legal research, normatively is the approach by collecting and studying, documents, and applicable laws and regulations, which are related to the determination of state losses by APIP.The results of the research shows that based on Article 50 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 60 Year 2008 concerning Government Internal Control Systems, APIP can conduct audits with specific objectives in order to calculate the state losses due to corruption. However, in calculating state losses, APIP must get a request from the legal apparatus first as stated in the cooperation agreement made by the Inspectorate and BPKP as APIP. Based on these rules, APIP only has a mandate from the legal apparatus so that the audit results of the APIP is informative and do not constitute a state administration decision. Therefore based on the Supreme Court Circular No. 4 of 2016 concerning the Imposition of the 2016 Supreme Court Chamber Room Plenary Meeting Results as a guideline for the implementation of duties for the court, APIP is only authorized to calculate state losses and can only determine state losses by BPK.
Kedudukan Lembaga Pengawas dan Penguatan Sistem Merit Pasca Putusan MK 121/PUU-XXII/2024 Alya, Dian; Suhendra, Azifah Syaqila Ravadina; Pratama, Febrio Dosi; Iskandar, Iskandar; Madinar, Madinar
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.55-65

Abstract

The abolition of the State Civil Service Commission through Law No. 20 of 2023 on the State Civil Service has raised serious concerns regarding the weakening of merit system oversight and the increased risk of bureaucratic politicization. The Constitutional Court addressed this issue through Decision No. 121/PUU-XXII/2024, which declared the abolition of KASN conditionally unconstitutional and mandated the reestablishment of an independent oversight body. This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing an independent civil service oversight body and to formulate an ideal institutional design following the Court’s ruling to ensure the continued implementation of the merit system within the government bureaucracy. The study employs a normative legal. The legal materials utilized include legislation, Constitutional Court decisions, and relevant academic literature. The findings indicate that the absence of an independent external oversight body has the potential to increase violations of civil service neutrality, the buying and selling of public office, and political interference in the appointment of public positions, particularly at the local level. This study identifies two institutional design models: the Parliamentary Oversight Satellite, which situates the oversight body within the parliamentary framework, and the Independent Administrative Commission, structured as a public legal entity with institutional autonomy, financial independence, and executive authority. In conclusion, future civil service oversight bodies must not merely function in an advisory capacity but must also possess effective enforcement authority and maintain an institutional position separate from the executive branch to ensure the realization of a professional, neutral, and integrity-driven bureaucracy.
Implications of the Work From Anywhere Policy from the Perspective of Employment Law and Public Service: A Case Study of the Central Bengkulu Regency Government Nofran, Muhammad Yogi; Rozanda, M. Azzah; Jovinka, Fadel; Iskandar, Iskandar; Madinar, Madinar
The Future of Education Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah Yayasan Pendidikan Tumpuan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61445/tofedu.v5i2.1711

Abstract

The Work From Anywhere (WFA) policy established through the Circular Letter of the Regent of Bengkulu Tengah Number 000.8.3/0014/B.7/1/2026 introduces a flexible working arrangement for civil servants (ASN) within the Bengkulu Tengah Regency Government, stipulating that civil servants are required to work from office for three days per week while being permitted to work from any location for the remaining two days. This study examines two principal legal issues: first, the conformity of the WFA policy with the hierarchy of civil service regulations in Indonesia, and second, its implications for the fulfilment of public service obligations toward the community from the perspective of excellent public service principles. The research employs a normative legal method with statute and case study approaches. The findings indicate that although the Regent possesses attributed authority to establish internal personnel policies, the Circular Letter does not occupy a formal position within the statutory hierarchy, thus limiting its binding force to the internal scope of the agency. Furthermore, the three-day office work scheme carries a risk of reduced public service accessibility and responsiveness if not accompanied by adequate service substitution mechanisms. The study recommends strengthening the legal foundation through a Regent Regulation and establishing an integrated quality assurance system for public services during WFA implementation.
Kedudukan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Aparatur Sipil Negara di Indonesia Subri, Subri; Dzakirah, Aqilah; Nasiswa, Olga Arawinda; Rahmadina, Anisya Nurroliyati; Madinar, Madinar
AHKAM Vol 5 No 3 (2026): DESEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10150

Abstract

The State Administrative Court (PTUN) plays a central role as an instrument of judicial oversight of personnel administrative decisions that may harm State Civil Apparatus (ASN). This study aims to analyze the mechanism for resolving ASN personnel disputes through the PTUN from the aspects of authority, procedure, and the substance of personnel administrative decisions, as well as to examine forms of legal protection for ASN who are harmed by decisions of dishonorable dismissal. This study used a normative legal method with a statutory approach and a case approach, referring to Jakarta State Administrative Court Decision Number 170/G/2020/PTUN.Jkt as the main analytical material. The results show that the mechanism for resolving ASN personnel disputes through the PTUN is systematic and multilayered. ASN are first required to pursue administrative remedies in the form of objections and administrative appeals before filing a lawsuit with the PTUN, which subsequently examines the validity of the State Administrative Decision based on authority, procedure, and its conformity with the General Principles of Good Governance. Legal protection for ASN subjected to dishonorable dismissal is realized through two dimensions, namely preventive protection in the form of guarantees of a fair examination process and the right to defend oneself, and repressive protection in the form of the right to pursue the state administrative court mechanism accompanied by the right to rehabilitation if the lawsuit is granted. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the PTUN has an important position in ensuring legal certainty, procedural justice, and the protection of ASN rights in personnel administrative disputes. The implications of the study show that the effectiveness of legal protection for ASN greatly depends on the quality of evidence and procedural compliance from the early stages of the personnel process.
Legal implications of changes to State Civil Servants or Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) regulations on personnel management systems in Indonesia Ansori, M. Tedi; Putra, Marta Deki; Triananda, Djorghi Samudra; Iskandar, Iskandar; Madinar, Madinar
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i5.1817

Abstract

The amendment of the State Civil Servants or Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) regulation through Law Number 20 of 2023 introduced significant normative changes to Indonesia’s personnel management system. This study examines the legal consequences of these regulatory changes from the perspective of state administrative law, focusing on the merit system, institutional oversight, talent management, and the reorganization of non-ASN staff. The methodology utilized in this analysis is normative juridical, employing both statutory and conceptual approaches grounded in secondary legal resources such as statutes, legal theories, academic publications, and formal institutional documents. The findings indicate that Law Number 20 of 2023 enhances the merit system by implementing national talent management and a unified digital system for personnel administration, while offering a more defined legal structure for the reorganization of non-ASN staff. Moreover, the new regulation proposes modifications to the institutional framework governing ASN oversight, including the revision of the supervisory function previously held by the State Civil Service Commission or Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara (KASN). From an administrative law perspective, these alterations have legal implications for the principles of legality, certainty, accountability, professionalism, and neutrality within public administration. This research contends that while the recent regulation signifies a movement towards modernizing and reinforcing ASN governance, various normative challenges persist, especially in relation to institutional oversight, the harmonization of implementation regulations, and the reliability of merit system protections amid Indonesia's bureaucratic reform initiatives. Consequently, there is a need for comprehensive derivative regulations and enhanced administrative oversight to guarantee legal certainty and the effective execution of the ASN personnel management system.
Penerapan Asas Keterbukaan Dalam Pencatatan Serikat Pekerja (Studi Kasus: Putusan PTUN Bandung Nomor 133/G/2025/PTUN.BDG) Velinda, Dina Septa; Madinar, Madinar; Mufidah, Assyifa Nadaul; Nisa, Ahmara; Sari, Alia Fahlika
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 1 February - May 2
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i1.280

Abstract

This study examines the application of the principle of transparency (asas keterbukaan) in the administrative process of trade union registration, based on the Decision of the Bandung Administrative Court (PTUN) Number 133/G/2025/PTUN.BDG. The research addresses two main issues: the forms of non-transparency in the issuance of the State Administrative Decision (Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara) concerning trade union registration, and the qualification of such non-transparency as a violation of the principle of transparency under administrative law. The study employs a normative legal research method through a statutory approach and a case approach. The findings reveal that the Garut Regency Manpower and Transmigration Office issued a Trade Union Registration Certificate without responding to objections raised by interested parties, without verifying the accuracy of membership data, and without ensuring the legitimacy of the trade union formation process. These actions constitute a cumulative violation of the principle of transparency, encompassing both procedural and substantive defects, thereby rendering the decision legally void. The Bandung Administrative Court upheld the lawsuit and declared the registration certificate null and void. This study concludes that the consistent application of the principle of transparency in the administrative registration of trade unions is an essential prerequisite for legal certainty, protection of workers' rights, and industrial relations stability. Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan asas keterbukaan dalam proses administrasi pencatatan serikat pekerja berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Bandung Nomor 133/G/2025/PTUN.BDG. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini mencakup dua hal, yaitu bentuk ketidaktransparanan dalam penerbitan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara terkait pencatatan serikat pekerja serta kualifikasi ketidaktransparanan tersebut sebagai pelanggaran asas keterbukaan dalam hukum administrasi negara. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Garut telah menerbitkan Tanda Bukti Pencatatan Serikat Pekerja tanpa merespons keberatan yang diajukan pihak yang berkepentingan, tanpa memverifikasi keakuratan data keanggotaan, serta tanpa memastikan keabsahan proses pembentukan serikat pekerja itu sendiri. Tindakan tersebut memenuhi unsur pelanggaran asas keterbukaan yang bersifat kumulatif, yaitu mengandung cacat prosedur dan cacat substansi sekaligus, sehingga secara yuridis keputusan dimaksud layak dibatalkan. Majelis Hakim PTUN Bandung mengabulkan gugatan dan menyatakan batal tanda bukti pencatatan tersebut. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penerapan asas keterbukaan secara konsisten dalam administrasi pencatatan serikat pekerja merupakan prasyarat penting bagi terciptanya kepastian hukum, perlindungan hak pekerja, dan stabilitas hubungan industrial.
ANALISIS YURIDIS CACAT HUKUM KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (KTUN) DALAM PUTUSAN PTUN JAYAPURA : NO. 40/G/2018/PTUN.JPR hartanti, Adelia; azzahra, Aliya; trisya, Dinda; Madinar, Madinar; ervina, nana
Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Vol. 12 No. 02 (2026): Volume 12 No. 2, Juni 2026 Public
Publisher : STKIP Subang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.14143

Abstract

the Jayapura Administrative Court Decision Number 40/G/2018/PTUN.JPR and their implications for legal protection of the plaintiff. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the KTUN in the Jayapura Administrative Court Decision Number 40/G/2018/PTUN.JPR contains legal defects in the form of substantive and procedural defects. The substantive defect is reflected in the absence of a clear legal basis and evidence regarding the determination of payment obligations imposed on the plaintiff. In addition, the defendant could not provide official documents forming the basis for issuing the decision. The procedural defect is reflected in the failure to apply the principles of transparency and accuracy in the issuance process of the KTUN. The KTUN also contradicts Article 53 paragraph (2) of Law Number 9 of 2004 and the general principles of good governance, particularly the principles of legal certainty, accuracy, and transparency. The implications of these legal defects caused material and immaterial losses to the plaintiff in the form of unclear payment obligations and legal uncertainty. Legal protection for the plaintiff was provided through a lawsuit mechanism in the Administrative Court, resulting in the cancellation of the KTUN by the panel of judges.
Co-Authors Alya, Dian Ansori, M. Tedi Azzahra, Aliya Dzakirah, Aqilah Ervina, Nana Febbiazka, Karmila Hartanti, Adelia Iskandar Iskandar Jovinka, Fadel Mufidah, Assyifa Nadaul Nasiswa, Olga Arawinda Nisa, Ahmara Nofran, Muhammad Yogi NURMAYANI NURMAYANI Pratama, Febrio Dosi Putra, Marta Deki Rahmadina, Anisya Nurroliyati Rozanda, M. Azzah Sari, Alia Fahlika Subri, Subri Suhendra, Azifah Syaqila Ravadina Triananda, Djorghi Samudra Trisya, Dinda Velinda, Dina Septa