Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

DIGITAL IJTIHAD QAWAʿIDI: A MAQAṢIDIC EPISTEMOLOGY FOR BLOCKCHAIN-BASED ISLAMIC LEGAL SYSTEMS Nursobah, Achmad
Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah, Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/jdes.v13i1.1856

Abstract

This study proposes a novel epistemological framework in Islamic legal theory termed Digital Ijtihad Qawaʿidi, an integrative model that embeds qawaʿid fiqhiyah (legal maxims) and maqaṣid al-shariʿah (higher objectives of Islamic law) into blockchain-based legal architectures. Employing a qualitative–philosophical approach within a transdisciplinary framework, the research synthesizes uṣul al-fiqh epistemology, digital ethics, and the philosophy of technology. The study argues that the rise of autonomous algorithmic systems necessitates a paradigmatic shift from fiqh al-naṣṣ (text-centered legal reasoning) toward fiqh al-niẓam al-raqami (digital system–based legal reasoning). The proposed model consists of three interrelated stages: takyif al-waqiʿ al-raqami (analysis of digital structures), tanzil al-qawaʿid ʿala al-waqiʿ (operationalization of legal maxims within system functions), and taḥqiq al-maqaṣid al-raqamiyyah (evaluation of maqaṣid-oriented outcomes). Through conceptual mapping and illustrative cases namely SukukChain, ZakatChain, and Halal Chain this study demonstrates that qawaʿid fiqhiyah can be translated into algorithmic norms capable of ensuring legal certainty (yaqin), justice (ʿadl), and trust (amanah). This research contributes to the epistemological reconstruction of Islamic law in the context of non-human decision-making systems and establishes a maqaṣidic foundation for Shariah-oriented blockchain governance. Accordingly, Islamic law is repositioned not merely as a passive observer of technological change, but as an active normative framework shaping global digital ethics.
Ḥȋlah Dalam Fatwa DSN-MUI Tentang Dana TBDSP Bagi Lembaga Keuangan Syariah Hasim, Hasim; Muhajir, Muhajir; Nursobah, Achmad
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 6: Oktober 2024
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v3i6.5116

Abstract

The use of new transactions in Islamic finance has faced criticism, particularly regarding the implementing of ḥȋlah (legal stratagem) which is seen as adopting conventional financial instruments that go against religious morals. This research examines the application of ḥȋlah in the Indonesian Ulama Council's (DSN-MUI) fatwa, or religious ruling, on funds that are not considered to be halal (funds that cannot be recognized as income). A way to divide up accounts and direct non-halal money toward social causes is offered by the DSN-MUI. Using a normative-philosophical perspective, this study reveals how ḥċlah is applied in the fatwa. The results show indications of the application of ḥȋlah, as seen from: (1) the recognition of non-halal funds, (2) the obligation to have a special account to separate halal and non-halal funds, and (3) the distribution of non-halal funds for socio-religious activities as an effort to avoid the stagnation of wealth. Overall, this fatwa tends to use ḥȋlah by referring to the practice of the Prophet Muhammad in handling assets with unclear legal status.
The Transformation of Ḥifẓ Al-'Ird in Contemporary Uṣūl Al-Fiqh: A Maqāṣid Framework for The Protection of Digital Dignity in The Deepfake Era Nursobah, Achmad
Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman (May)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Nahdlatul Ulama (LPT NU) PCNU Kabupaten Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59240/kjsk.v6i2.747

Abstract

This article departs from a new anxiety in the world of Islamic law: human dignity is now threatened not only in the social-physical space, but also in the digital space. The deepfake phenomenon has given birth to a form of slander that is so convincing that it can damage reputations, collapse public trust, and even cause economic losses. With a doctrinal qualitative approach enriched by the AIRE (authenticity, integrity, reliability, explainability) digital forensic standard, this study reconstructs the concept of ḥifẓ al-ʿirḍ in uṣūl al-fiqh to be relevant to contemporary digital challenges. The results of the study map the typology of digital slander: sexualization, political manipulation, and financial fraud and classify digital evidence into three levels: valid as bayyinah, just forensic qarīnah, or must be rejected. The analysis of maqāṣid shows that the protection of dignity can defeat the claim of freedom of expression when the negative impact is greater. From this was born new ideas: al-bayyinah al-raqmiyyah as a standard of digital evidence, karāmah al-raqmiyyah, which equates digital insults with qadhf, and the selective application of the principle of sadd/fatḥ al-żarāʾiʿ to AI technology. This article then offers a maqāṣid framework for the protection of digital dignity with four layers: prevention, detection, adjudication, and remediation as a bridge between classical legal theory and modern forensic practice, while presenting a blueprint for the protection of dignity in the digital age