Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

Regulasi Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Orang Yang Melakukan Kohabitasi (Kumpul Kebo) Sholikah, Ana; Hidayati, Rahmatul; Parmono, Budi; Muhibbin, Muh; Ilmania, Nurika Falah
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i1.3009

Abstract

Cohabitation (cohabitation) is an act that violates the juridical and social norms of criminal law carried out in the State of Indonesia. The research was prepared to find out the legal rules for cohabitation offenders and a comparison of cohabitation according to the Criminal Code Law Number 1 of 1946, Law Number 1 of 1951 and Emergency Law Number 1 of 1951 concerning Temporary Measures to Organize the Unity of the Structure of Powers and Procedures of Civil Courts. This research is normative juridical research using the technique of approaching the law. The results of the study reveal that in the regulation there is no explicit formulation policy on cohabitation in the Criminal Code / WvS. Legal arrangements for cohabitation offenders are contained in Article 412 of Law Number 1 of 2023 but have not been enforced. So that the legal arrangements for cohabitation offenders use Jurisprudence, but only certain regions use it. Keywords: Regulation; Legal Consequences; Cohabitation.
KONSEP PENGATURAN HUKUM TENTANG PERPINDAHAN NARAPIDANA ANTAR NEGARA (TRANSFER SENTENCED PERSON) STUDI KOMPARATIF ANTAR NEGARA Rahmat, Fabitul; Muhibbin, Moh.; Parmono, Budi
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2, OCTOBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v8i2.252

Abstract

In the international context, the transfer of sentence persons is regulated in the general international standards in handling cross-border crime issues as outlined in the 2000 Palermo Convention (United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime) which Indonesia passed into law through Law Number 5 of 2009 concerning the Ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, in which member states are allowed to make agreements in handling crime through extradition agreements, mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, and transfer of sentence persons. Legal regulation on the transfer of prisoners between countries (Transfer Sentenced Person (TSP)) is important for Indonesia in order to reform and social rehabilitation for prisoners, so that imprisonment is used to ensure, as far as possible, the reintegration of prisoners in society after release so that they can live a law-abiding and independent life. The need for the state to establish a regulation in the form of a law on the transfer of prisoners between countries (TSP), is intended to create legal certainty, so that cooperation carried out with other countries either as a country requested by Indonesia or vice versa (as a requesting country) has a legal basis that provides restrictions on what is in accordance with the concept of the purpose and politics of punishment law in Indonesia.
Non-Decriminalization of Political Offenses in Indonesia: A Study on Article 154 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) Parmono, Budi; Hidayati, Rahmatul; Ahnaf, Muhammad Qatrunnada
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute November
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v8i4.8136

Abstract

Article 154 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana; KUHP) is classified as a political offense because it is directed against the state, aims at public harm (public wrong), and involves non-violent expression of enmity or contempt (oral, written, or visual). The Dutch Government, however, viewed Article 154 KUHP as undemocratic and contrary to free expression and opinion, arguing it was only justifiable in colonial Indonesia for their interests. This created a divergence between the legislative interests of a colonized nation and a democratic one regarding 'expression' or 'opinion'. The Netherlands has equivalent provisions in Articles 137a to 137e of their Criminal Code, focusing on public insult against authorities or specific groups. While the Dutch code formulates these as formal insult offenses, Indonesia’s Article 154 KUHP is broader, covering both formal and material insult. Notably, Articles 137a and 137b of the Dutch Criminal Code were revoked in 1978 for conflicting with Dutch freedom of expression, while Article 154 KUHP remains enforced in Indonesia because its elements are considered identical to Political Offenses.
Criminal Actions Against People Exploiting Children In Accordance To Indonesian Criminal Law Junaeddy, M.; Parmono, Budi; Arief, Hanafi
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.47

Abstract

Exploitation of children is now more widespread, not carried out by families but also by small to large institutional groups. The perpetrators are sometimes the parents themselves with the intention of making a profit. The purpose of this study is to describe the position of children in Indonesian criminal law and to analyze criminal sanctions for child exploitation. As normative legal research, this study examines laws and regulations related to child exploitation and criminal sanctions. Research results: Article 45 of the Criminal Code defines a child as an immature person if he is not yet 16 years old. Criminal law has positioned children as legal subjects who must protect themselves and their interests as well as the special rights of the state. Economic, social and sexual exploitation of children with the intention of benefiting oneself or others is a criminal act. Criminal sanctions for those who commit, order to do, and those who participate in committing the act; give or promise something by abusing power or dignity, by violence, threats or misdirection, or by giving opportunities, means or information, encouraging other people to take action; intercourse (not the wife) is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of nine years
Criminal Responsibility Of Defamation Under The Indonesian Criminal Law Aryansyah, Aryansyah; Parmono, Budi; Muhibbin, Muhibbin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.48

Abstract

The Research, "Responsibility of Defamation Actors in Indonesian Positive Law Studies" aims to describe the arrangements for criminal acts of defamation in the Indonesian criminal law system as well as analyze criminal responsibility for perpetrators of defamation in the Indonesian criminal law system. This research is a normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system as well as unwritten legal values ??that live in society, which are related to the responsibility of perpetrators of defamation in the perspective of positive law in Indonesia. The results of the research can be presented in an outline: Arrangements for criminal acts of defamation in Indonesian criminal law are regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP), and the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The Criminal Code regulates Article 310 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), as well as Article 311 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. Whereas in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3); Criminal responsibility for defamation in the Indonesian criminal law system is borne by anyone who intentionally attacks the reputation or reputation of a person, by accusing something with clear intentions so that it is publicly known (Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code), and is also borne by every a person who intentionally and without rights distributes and/or transmits and/or makes accessible Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents that contain insults and/or defamation (Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions
Status Of Corruption Acts Under The Indonesian Criminal Law System Nur Azizy, Ahmad; Parmono, Budi; Muhibbin, Moh.
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.51

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to describe the regulation of criminal law in Indonesia and to analyze the position of corruption in Indonesian criminal law. This research uses normative legal research in the form of library research using three types of legal materials, namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials, with the nature of qualitative descriptive research. The results of the study show that the criminal act of corruption is a part of Indonesian criminal law whose arrangements are outside the Criminal Code (KUHP). In addition, this crime has certain specifications that are different from general criminal law which are regulated in separate laws, namely: Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended in Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The criminal act of corruption is also known as a special crime. The criminal act of corruption is a part of the special criminal law which has certain specifications that are different from the general criminal law, such as deviations from procedural law and when viewed from the regulated material. The Criminal Procedure Code for corruption that is applied is lex specialist in nature, namely the existence of deviations intended to speed up procedures and obtain investigations, prosecutions and examinations at court hearings.
Criminal Actions Of Illegal Logging In The Perspective Of Forestry Law Wibawa, G.M. Angga Satrya; Muhibbin, Moh.; Parmono, Budi
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.55

Abstract

This research aims to describe the regulation of illegal logging in Indonesian positive law and to analyze how illegal logging is in the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. It is a normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system with the values ??contained in the Forestry Law Number 19 of 2004 and Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, The research results show that illegal logging is regulated in the Forestry Law, namely Forestry Law No. 19 of 2004, changes to Law no. 41 of 1999 became a Law as an instrument in tackling illegal logging crimes. Then Regulation of the Minister of Forestry Number: P.30/Menhut-II/2012 concerning Administration of Forest Products originating from Private Forests. The government also enacted Law no. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction as statutory regulations, and is the implementation of Law no. 14 of 1999. Illegal logging sanctions are emphasized in the Forestry Law in the form of criminal sanctions given to those who carry out illegal logging, according to Law no. 18 of 2013 with a maximum prison sentence of 15 years and a maximum fine of IDR 100 billion.
Granting Of Criminal Sanctions Against Children Consumpting Narcotics Ediwan, Elche Angelina; Parmono, Budi; Muhibbin, Moh.
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i2.57

Abstract

This research aims to describe the regulation of Narcotics criminal acts according to positive law in Indonesia and those responsible for criminal sanctions against children who use Narcotics according to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics’ This research is normative legal research, descriptive in nature, statutory approach, consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Qualitative analysis is carried out systematically in order to get answers to problems. The results of the study stated that the regulation of narcotics crimes began with Law No. 9 of 1976 which prohibited the manufacture, storage, distribution and use of narcotics. Then Law No. 22 of 1997 with a wider scope, the criminal threat is made worse in the form of the death penalty. Then Law no. 35 of 2009, prohibits possessing, storing, controlling or providing Narcotics and Narcotics Precursors; the act of producing, importing, exporting, or releasing Narcotics and Narcotics precursor; acts in the form of offering to sell, sell, buy, receive, become an intermediary in buying and selling, exchanging, or handing over Narcotics and Narcotics precursors; and acts in the form of bringing, sending, transporting or transiting Narcotics and precursors. Criminal sanctions for children who use Narcotics are regulated in Law No. 3 of 1997 concerning Juvenile Courts and Law No. 35. Children who commit Narcotics crimes can be sentenced under Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009 in conjunction with Article 22 of Law No. 3 of 1997 amended to Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Prison sentence that can be written off for Narcotics children is no longer than ½ (one half) of the maximum prison sentence for adults.
Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Notaris yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Profesi dalam Menjalankan Tugas dan Jabatannya Menurut Undang-Undang yang Berlaku Prasetyo Nugroho, Akhmad Dwi; Parmono, Budi; Sunardi, Sunardi
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v5i2.5128

Abstract

Profesi notaris merupakan suatu profesi mulia (officium nobile). Notaris terhimpun dalam sebuah wadah perkumpulan yang bernama Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (I.N.I) yang telah menyusun Kode Etik, sebagai pedoman berperilaku yang berisi norma atau kaidah moral atau aturan dalam suatu organisasi (perkumpulan) dan mengikat anggotanya. Kode Etik Notaris dibuat dengan tujuan menjaga martabat profesi notaris dan untuk melindungi klien atau warga masyarakat dari penyalahgunaan kewenangan dari seorang Notaris. Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk – bentuk dan sanksi pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris. Meskipun sudah ada koridor hukum dan kode etik, di dalam praktiknya masih saja terdapat oknum notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan dan kode etik dalam menjalankan profesinya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Sumber bahan hukum diambil dengan melakukan penelitian kepustakaan. Analisis bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara mengutip pasal-pasal peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan sedangkan pendapat para sarjana dikutip sebagai  landasan teori guna menjawab isu hukum yang dikemukakan. Dari hasil dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa bahwa sebagai upaya menjaga kehormatan dan keluhuran martabat jabatan notaris, maka perlu penegakan kode etik terhadap oknum notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran dalam menjalankan profesinya. Untuk menjatuhkan sanksi terhadap oknum notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran harus melalui mekanisme yang diatur dalam Kode Etik Notaris dengan mempertimbangkan bobot/kualitas pelanggarannya.
Between Statutory Authority and Administrative Discretion: Case Study of the Merah Putih Cooperative Deed Made by a Notary Pratiwi, Premitha Ayu; Siboy, Ahmad; Parmono, Budi
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v10i1.348

Abstract

This study examines the normative conflict between statutory authority and administrative discretion in the establishment of Merah Putih Cooperatives under Indonesia’s 2025 national cooperative revitalization program. While the Law on the Notarial Office grants notaries general authority to prepare authentic deeds, administrative regulations require a specific designation as Cooperative Deed Officials (NPAK), creating legal uncertainty in practice. Unlike previous studies that focused on general cooperatives and the procedural role of NPAK, this research is the first to analyze the legal bottlenecks generated by state-driven digital transformation through the SABH/AHU Online system within the Merah Putih initiative. Using a normative juridical approach, this study evaluates the civil, administrative, and ethical consequences of deeds prepared by non-NPAK notaries. The findings demonstrate that although such deeds remain civilly valid, administrative rejection may prevent cooperatives from obtaining legal entity status, resulting in significant socio-economic losses at the village level. The findings reveal that digital administrative filtering has transformed ministerial discretion into de facto statutory limitation, generating legal uncertainty, delaying village economic programs, and causing measurable financial losses at the local level. This study proposes regulatory harmonization to restore statutory authority while maintaining administrative oversight. The policy implication emphasizes the need to prevent digital governance mechanisms from undermining hierarchical legal certainty in Indonesia’s cooperative development framework. This research offers policy recommendations for harmonizing statutory and administrative norms to ensure legal certainty, professional integrity, and the effective implementation of Indonesia’s cooperative reform agenda.