Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)

POSITION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE PROCESS OF PROVIDING PROCEDURE IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT The Position of Electronic Evidence in the Evidentiary Process of State Administrative Court Procedural Law Komang Alit Antara; Moh. Fadli; Sudarsono
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2753

Abstract

This study analyzes the position of electronic evidence in the legal evidence process of the State Administrative Court. The development of information technology has had significant implications for the justice system, especially in the recognition and use of electronic evidence. However, there is a gap between the increasingly digitalized practice of government administration and the PTUN procedural law mechanism which still focuses on physical documents. This study uses normative legal analysis conducted with a statutory and conceptual regulatory approach, using data from related laws and legal literature. The results of the study indicate that the unclear regulations in Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the PTUN, although the ITE Law has recognized electronic evidence, cause legal uncertainty, differences in judge interpretation, and potential manipulation of evidence. Therefore, this study recommends the reconstruction of PTUN procedural law norms to include explicit provisions regarding electronic evidence, the establishment of a digital forensic validation institution, and the regulation of authentication and security of electronic documents. These steps are important to ensure justice, legal certainty, and efficiency in resolving state administrative disputes in the digital era.
REINFORCING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: THE SHIFTING BURDEN OF PROOF MODEL IN OMISSION DISPUTES ON DISASTER MANAGEMENT Muhamad Fadillah; Moh. Fadli; Maria Fransiska Walintukan
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2768

Abstract

This article aims to analyze and propose the application of the shifting burden of proof model in resolving omission disputes within the Indonesian Administrative Court (PTUN), particularly in the context of disaster management. Omission disputes frequently arise from governmental negligence in fulfilling legal obligations that are clearly stipulated by statutory regulations. The heavy burden of proof imposed on the claimant, combined with the unequal access to administrative documents, poses significant challenges in proving such negligence. This article adopts a normative-qualitative approach, using the case study of Decision No. 10/G/TF/2022/PTUN.PLG to illustrate the practical issues encountered by the public. The proposed model of shifting the burden of proof provides a pathway for the Administrative Court to reinforce its jurisdiction as a guardian of governmental accountability, while also serving as a corrective mechanism against state negligence in the administration of disaster management.
ONRECHTMATIGE OVERHEIDSDAAD: UNLAWFUL ACTS BY THE STATE IN INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Rizki Cintia Devi; Moh. Fadli; Bambang Hery Mulyono
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2797

Abstract

Considering that the government's actions in carrying out its functions by using public and private legal instruments will ultimately intersect with the interests of citizens, a means of legal protection is needed to maintain a balance so that the objectives of the public interest can be achieved without necessarily sacrificing the rights of citizens protected by law. This research is a normative-research that studies legal objectives, values of justice, validity of legal rules, legal concepts, and legal norms. Normative legal research can also be said to be a process for finding legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines in order to answer the legal issues at hand. The source materials used in this research are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Primary legal material is Indonesian Law. Furthermore, the data collected is analyzed qualitatively. The element of “against the law” in the formulation of administrative disputes referred to in Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration is to interfere with the rights of others; second, contrary to the legal obligations of the perpetrator; third, contrary to decency; fourth, contrary to the decency, thoroughness, and careful attitude that a person should have in association with fellow citizens or against other people's objects. If these elements are fulfilled, the party aggrieved by the decision of the State Administrative Officer may file a lawsuit with the State Administrative Court. With the development of the concept of KTUN in Article 87 of Law No. 30/2014, it can be seen that concrete actions are one form of KTUN. Thus, the lawsuit against the existence of real actions which is an onrechtmatige overheidsdaad lawsuit which was previously the absolute competence of the District Court, has changed to the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court.
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGES' EFFORTS TO PROVIDE LEGAL PROTECTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTES (Decision Number 59/G/2023/PTUN.JKT) Muhammad Fathur Rahman; Moh. Fadli; Adi Kusumaningrum
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2896

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Management and the Environment has been based on a legal basis and a philosophical basis that has elements of protection for Human Rights. In the provisions of Perma Number 1 of 2023 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Environmental Cases, it not only expands the objects of Environmental disputes but also adds a PTUN touchstone in testing the validity of Decisions or Actions taken by Officials/State Administrative Agencies, namely human rights provisions. As the third touchstone, it does not mean that Human Rights Provisions can be set aside in testing environmental disputes. Because environmental disputes are closely related to Human Rights. So that PTUN Judges can classify which Decisions or Actions are classified as violating the Law, AUPB or Human Rights Provisions. This research method is carried out by reviewing literature sources, namely by examining legal principles and norms. This article aims to provide an understanding of Judicial Activism in Environmental cases by the Panel of Judges, which is not impossible based on the Theory of Legal Protection in order to realize the objectives of the law, namely justice, benefit and legal certainty.
APPLICATION OF DWANGSOM (COERCED MONEY) IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION BREACH OF PAYMENT OF SHARIA LIFE INSURANCE CLAIMS (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 364 K/Ag/2023) Firdiansyah Hidayatullah; Moh. Fadli; Sihabudin
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4110

Abstract

The ruling in the Supreme Court Decision Number 364 K/Ag/2023 contains a penalty of payment of a sum of Rp538,178,014.00 (five hundred thirty-eight million one hundred seventy-eight thousand and fourteen rupiah) and also contains a penalty of dwangsom (forced money) to the defendant/applicant of cassation in the amount of Rp100,000.00 (one hundred thousand rupiah) for each day the defendant is late in carrying out the contents of the decision that has obtained permanent legal force. If referring to the norm in Article 606a Rv, the judge can only impose a penalty of dwangsom (forced money) if the judge's decision contains a penalty other than the penalty of paying a sum of money. The deviation in the application of the penalty of dwangsom (forced money) in the decision is based on considerations of justice and legal benefits as contained in the legal considerations. The research method in this writing is a normative legal research method by analyzing legal norms with legal principles. The purpose of this writing is to provide an understanding of the judge's authority in imposing a dwangsom (forced money) penalty in a default decision which includes a penalty of payment of a sum of money in a sharia life insurance case which is guided by the principles of justice, legal benefit, and the principle of ta'awun (mutual assistance).