HosseiniEskandian, Abdullah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

THE DESIGN ARGUMENT FOR GOD’S EXISTENCE: Ayatullâh Ja’far Subḥânî’s Criticism of David Hume’s Thoughts Zamzami, Mukhammad; Gharamaleki, Ghorbanali Karimzadeh; Hosseinieskandian, Abdullah; Mahzumi, Fikri
Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 24, No 1 (2023): Islamic Philosophy & Mysticism
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/ua.v24i1.20698

Abstract

The design argument is one of the strongest arguments to prove God's existence. It has been analyzed by various thinkers throughout the history in defense of God’s existence. However, some empiricist philosophers who do not believe in God’s existence criticized and questioned this argument. David Hume (1711-1776) is one of those who made a tremendous effort to deny God’s existence. He also criticized the design argument. Hume’s critiques have always been challenged by philosophers and God-believing theologians. This article is made to criticize Hume’s critiques on the design argument from Ayatullâh Subḥânî’s perspective using descriptive-analytical method. Hume’s objection was due to misunderstanding of the argument’s purpose and function. It should be acknowledged that this argument can easily prove God’s essence along with other arguments such as ḥudûth, necessity, and possibility. The design argument pushes us to the supernatural limits. Also, this argument is supported by experimental sciences because every new discovery made in natural sciences provides us with a new sign to prove God.
The Principles of the Issue of Resurrection According to the Propositions of Muslim Thinkers HosseiniEskandian, Abdullah; Babaei, Ali
Hayula: Jurnal Indonesia Studi Islam Multi-disiplin Vol 8 No 2 (2024): Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies
Publisher : Laboratorium Prodi Pendidikan Agama Islam UNJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/hayula.008.02.02

Abstract

The issue of resurrection is one of the basic principles of divine religions that all the divine prophets had the mission to invite people to believe in the Day of Judgment after being called to worship the Only God. Among the divine religions, Islam has shown special attention to the question of resurrection and this basic principle has been discussed and pondered by many Muslim thinkers. In addition to the religious aspect, the issue of resurrection is of fundamental importance since the general nature of the human race is mixed with it and humans tend towards happiness and good fortune. In this article, an attempt is made to investigate the importance and necessity of the issue of resurrection, the nature of resurrection, the types of resurrection, the questions of resurrection and its proof based on the Islamic perspective, using a descriptive-analytical method. Apart from all the proofs that have been established to prove the issue of resurrection, it can be stated that human nature tends to an end beyond this material world that does not see himself limited in this world and sees a world beyond this material world in his horizon.
ACHIEVING TRUE HAPPINESS: A STUDY OF MUHAMMAD HOSSEIN TABATABAI’S PHILOSOPHICAL-MYSTICAL THOUGHT Zamzami, Mukhammad; Hosseinieskandian, Abdullah; Zuhri, Achmad Muhibin; Haidary, Abdullah Haq Al; Babaei, Ali
Islam Futura Vol 23, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jiif.v23i1.14760

Abstract

The question of what constitutes true happiness has been a core philosophical issue that has warranted multiple attempts in the attempt to provide a final answer, either from a purely religious or philosophical perspective. The issue of happiness is closely connected to the meaning of life and its ultimate outcome and purpose. The modern Muslim philosopher Muhammad Hossein Tabatabai discussed the nature of happiness at length. In his view, human beings instinctively strive to attain happiness or the ultimate good which can only be achieved through nearness to God. Therefore, true happiness requires the believer to commit righteous deeds and avoid sinful acts. This study follows a philosophical-Sufi approach and uses a descriptive-analytical method to examine the nature of happiness, the relationship between happiness, goodness and pleasure according to Tabatabai. In line with Islamic thought, true and lasting happiness can only be attained in the Hereafter, and happiness in this life, no matter how acutely and deeply felt, is merely a shadow of the true happiness of the believers who have attained God’s permission to enter Paradise. 
On the Intersection of Science and Religion: A Critical Analysis of Abdulkarim Soroush’s Thought Zamzami, Mukhammad; Gharamaleki, Ghorbanali Karimzadeh; Hosseinieskandian, Abdullah; A'la, Abd
Religió Jurnal Studi Agama-agama Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): September
Publisher : Department of Religious Studies, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/religio.v12i2.2167

Abstract

The idea of producing religious science is known not only in Iran and the Islamic world but also in the Western world. This idea has created movements in the Western world and the Islamic world in the field of science production, which are mainly divided into three perspectives. In the sources of science production, a group has given originality to naqlī (narrative) knowledge, a group to human knowledge and experimental sciences, and the third group confirmed both views and considered the way to acquire knowledge to be both intellect and narration. Abdulkarim Soroush is among those who have given originality to experimental sciences and knowledge in this field. In this article, an attempt is made to explain the nature of religious science with a descriptive-analytical method, examine and explain Soroush’s point of view, and state his bases and arguments in explaining this theory, and finally to criticize his point of view. Confusion of the two authorities of demonstration and confirmation, failure to provide a criterion for judging between religion and human knowledge in times of conflict, and the invalidity of generalizing historical evidence to all ages are some of the things that undermine the acceptance of Soroush’s theory.