Khairil Ansari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of Linktree Based on Argumentation Text Teaching Materials Mutiara Sany Hasibuan; Khairil Ansari; Safinatul Hasanah Harahap
Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30605/onoma.v11i3.6575

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop Linktree based on argumentation text teaching materials at SMK Negeri 7 Medan. This development research produces products in the form of Linktree argumentation text teaching materials to improve the ability of Medan Vocational High School students to compose coherent arguments, select relevant evidence, and compose persuasive arguments using argumentation text. The research on the development of this teaching material uses the 4D development model. Linktree based argumentation text teaching materials are feasible and bring good development and are effectively used by 11th grade students of SMK Negeri 7 Medan.ds.
Teacher Perspective: Implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning Model Nurjehan, Rizki; Khairil Ansari; Yusnadi
JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Vol. 26 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/jtp.v26i1.44084

Abstract

Research on Teacher Perspectives in the implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning model aims to analyze teachers' views on the implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning model. This research analyzes the difficulties, obstacles, advantages and disadvantages during the process of implementing the Contextual Teaching and Learning model. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method using observation sheets and questionnaires to collect the required information data and process it into the findings described. The findings obtained from the research are that there are obstacles to implementing the Contextual Teaching and Learning model at the Learning Community stage of 50% compared to the level of difficulty at other stages such as constructivism 20%, inquiry 10%, questioning 5%, modeling 5%, reflection 5% and authentic assessment 5%. Furthermore, it can be seen that the lowest level of implementation was in the Learning Community component, with 55 people answering that it was not implemented. Furthermore, in other components, namely constructivism, inquiry, questionnaire, modeling, reflection and authentic assessment, it was seen that an average of 15 to 20 people answered that it had not been implemented. So the research results conclude that there are obstacles to the implementation of the Learning Community stages in the Contextual Teaching and Learning model. The difficulty of implementing the Learning Community stages by teaching staff.