Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

Analisis Kriminologi Maraknya Tawuran Gangster oleh Anak di Era Digital Bayu Rizki Yoga Pratomo; Rasdi Rasdi
Annual Review of Legal Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/arls.vol2i2.25873

Abstract

The phenomenon of inter-gang brawls among teenagers, particularly those involving children in Indonesia, has become a complex and serious social issue. This research provides an in-depth criminological analysis of the prevalence of these brawls, focusing on the digital era's role in shaping and accelerating the dynamics of this deviant behavior. The study identifies both internal and external causal factors. Internally, involved adolescents often experience an identity crisis, possess weak self-control, and struggle with environmental adjustment. Their inability to manage emotions and seek positive recognition pushes them to find outlets in deviant groups. Externally, unfavorable family environments and the influence of deviant peer groups are significant contributing factors. What distinguishes this modern phenomenon is the catalytic role of digital technology, especially social media. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok have become primary arenas for provocation, challenges, and coordination of brawls, even enabling live broadcasts that can influence other adolescents to participate. The lack of parental supervision over children's social media use exacerbates these negative impacts. To address this, a comprehensive approach is necessary, encompassing pre-emptive (early prevention), preventive (ongoing prevention), and repressive (law enforcement with rehabilitation) efforts. This approach involves families, schools, communities, and law enforcement agencies, with an emphasis on restorative justice for children in conflict with the law.
Community Service Order in Indonesia: Between Alternatives and Transformation in the Reconstruction of the Penal System Didik Purnomo; Anis Widyawati; Bhanu Prakash Nunna; Rasdi Rasdi; Muhammad Azil Maskur
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v11i1.34493

Abstract

The integration of community service orders into the national criminal justice system indicates a shift away from a punitive approach dominated by incarceration toward the use of non-custodial sanctions more oriented toward rehabilitation and social reintegration. Nevertheless, studies systematically linking normative constructions, institutional readiness, and the community's role in their implementation remain relatively limited. This study aims to analyze the normative construction and institutional readiness for the application of community service as a substitute for short-term imprisonment, and to assess its consistency with criminal justice reform in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and comparative approach, through an analysis of national legal regulations and practices in several countries that have institutionalized community service orders. The results of the study show that although the normative framework is relatively comprehensive, its implementation effectiveness is greatly influenced by the consistency of judges' decisions, the readiness of the supervision and guidance system, and the level of collaboration between law enforcement officers and the community. The main challenge lies in the limitations of probation infrastructure and the tendency of a still prison-oriented penal culture. This study offers an innovation in the form of an integrative framework that links normative design, institutional capacity, and social participation as prerequisites for effective implementation. Thus, community service orders can be understood not only as an alternative to imprisonment but also as a policy instrument that can support the development of a penal system that is more proportional, rehabilitative, and oriented towards social reintegration.
Edukasi Hukum Pendaftaran Hak Cipta atas Karya Aksi Nyata bagi Guru di SDN Puro 2 Kabupaten Sragen Ayup Suran Ningsih; Aprila Niravita; Rasdi Rasdi; Nurul Fibrianti; Tri Andari Dahlan; Harumsari Puspa Wardhani
TEMATIK Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/tematik.v6i2.12824

Abstract

Edukasi hukum mengenai pentingnya pendaftaran hak cipta atas karya aksi nyata bagi guru di SDN Puro 2 Kabupaten Sragen merupakan kegiatan pengabdian yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan, kesadaran, dan keterampilan guru dalam melindungi karya intelektual yang mereka hasilkan. Dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya pemahaman guru terkait regulasi hak cipta, khususnya sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta serta relevansi perlindungan kekayaan intelektual dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan (UUP2SK). Melalui metode ceramah, diskusi interaktif, dan praktik langsung, para guru diberikan pemahaman menyeluruh mengenai manfaat pendaftaran hak cipta, baik dari sisi perlindungan hukum maupun peluang pengembangan profesionalisme. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan signifikan dalam pemahaman guru terhadap urgensi pendaftaran hak cipta serta keterampilan teknis dalam menggunakan sistem daring DJKI untuk mendaftarkan karya mereka. Dengan demikian, kegiatan ini  mendorong terciptanya budaya akademik yang lebih inovatif, produktif, dan berdaya saing di lingkungan sekolah dasar.
Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System: Opportunity or Threat to the Rule of Law? Winarsih Winarsih; Cahya Wulandari; Rasdi Rasdi
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): February, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/x6krrd03

Abstract

This research critically examines the role of restorative justice within the criminal justice system, questioning whether it serves as an opportunity or a threat to the rule of law. Restorative justice, which emphasizes repairing harm through dialogue, accountability, and community involvement, has gained traction as an alternative to traditional punitive measures. This study evaluates its application in various legal systems, with a specific focus on how it is integrated into the criminal justice framework and its potential implications for legal norms and procedural fairness. Through comparative legal analysis and interviews with legal practitioners, scholars, and individuals involved in restorative justice practices, the research assesses the effectiveness of restorative justice in balancing offender rehabilitation with the protection of victims' rights. The findings reveal that while restorative justice has the potential to provide more holistic solutions and reduce recidivism, its implementation in some jurisdictions raises concerns about its consistency with the rule of law. Critics argue that it may undermine established legal principles, such as due process and proportional punishment, while supporters emphasize its restorative and community-centered values. This study contributes to the ongoing debate by offering nuanced insights into the broader implications of restorative justice on legal reform, advocating for clearer frameworks and guidelines to ensure that it enhances rather than threatens the integrity of the justice system.
Protecting Children in the Judicial Process: Is the Indonesian Legal System Child-Friendly? Rasdi Rasdi; Anis Widyawati
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): February, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/hdr78233

Abstract

Ensuring child-friendly justice is a fundamental component of a rights-based legal system. In Indonesia, while legislative reforms—such as the Juvenile Justice System Law (Law No. 11/2012)—aim to protect children's rights during legal proceedings, implementation gaps persist. This study evaluates the extent to which the Indonesian legal system upholds child protection principles in criminal and civil judicial processes. Drawing on case analysis, field observations in child courts, and interviews with judges, lawyers, and child protection agencies, the research assesses procedural safeguards, restorative justice practices, and institutional support for child litigants. The findings indicate that although progress has been made in establishing special courts and diverting children from detention, significant challenges remain: lack of trained personnel, inadequate victim support systems, and limited awareness among law enforcement. Furthermore, the adversarial nature of courtrooms often fails to accommodate the psychological needs of children, especially in sensitive cases like abuse or custody disputes. This study’s novelty lies in its empirical grounding and child-centered approach, offering a multidimensional evaluation of the justice system’s responsiveness to children’s rights. It contributes to the broader discussion on legal reform by emphasizing the need for systemic changes in judicial attitudes, courtroom procedures, and inter-agency coordination. The study concludes with policy recommendations aimed at strengthening child-sensitive justice in Indonesia.
Gender-Based Violence and State Response: Assessing the Implementation of the TPKS Law Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah; Rasdi Rasdi
Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/2tphe030

Abstract

This paper evaluates the implementation of Indonesia’s 2022 Law on the Elimination of Sexual Violence (TPKS Law), which aims to address gender-based violence (GBV) and provide stronger legal protections for survivors. While the law marks a significant step toward gender justice, its effectiveness in practice remains debated. The study assesses the law’s provisions, such as the creation of special courts for sexual violence cases and the provision of victim protection mechanisms. By analyzing case studies, interviews with legal professionals, and survivors, the paper explores the challenges in implementation, including gaps in institutional capacity, cultural barriers, and a lack of public awareness. Furthermore, the research investigates how local governments, NGOs, and grassroots organizations are contributing to the law’s enforcement. The findings suggest that while the law’s enactment was a milestone, its success hinges on overcoming challenges such as victim-blaming, inconsistent legal interpretations, and limited support for survivors. The paper concludes by offering recommendations for strengthening the law’s implementation, such as improving training for law enforcement, increasing community outreach, and promoting comprehensive victim support services.
Optimalisasi Restitusi dan Konstruksi Dakwaan bagi Anak Korban Prostitusi Online Putri Maharani; Rasdi Rasdi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i2.13374

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of legal protection for child victims of online prostitution, particularly in the fulfillment of restitution rights and the construction of indictments in criminal justice practice through the analysis of Decision Number 563/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Srg. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches. The findings reveal that the implementation of restitution as regulated under Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017 remains suboptimal, while the use of alternative indictments limits the scope of criminal liability and results in the failure to fulfill victims’ recovery rights. This condition reflects a gap between legal norms and judicial practice that has not fully adopted the principle of the best interests of the child. The study highlights that indictment construction plays a strategic role in shaping legal protection and the effectiveness of restitution fulfillment. The novelty of this research lies in examining the causal relationship between indictment construction and the fulfillment of restitution rights for child victims, as well as recommending cumulative or combined indictments to achieve victim-oriented substantive justice.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban prostitusi online, khususnya dalam pemenuhan hak restitusi dan konstruksi dakwaan dalam praktik peradilan pidana melalui studi Putusan Nomor 563/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Srg. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan restitusi sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 belum optimal, serta penggunaan dakwaan alternatif menyebabkan terbatasnya ruang pertanggungjawaban pelaku dan tidak terpenuhinya hak pemulihan korban. Kondisi ini menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara norma hukum dan praktik peradilan yang belum sepenuhnya berorientasi pada kepentingan terbaik bagi anak. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa konstruksi dakwaan memiliki peran strategis dalam menentukan arah perlindungan hukum dan efektivitas pemenuhan restitusi. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis relasi kausal antara konstruksi dakwaan dan pemenuhan hak restitusi anak korban dalam putusan pengadilan, serta rekomendasi penggunaan dakwaan kumulatif atau kombinasi sebagai upaya mewujudkan keadilan substantif yang berorientasi pada pemulihan korban.