Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Analisis Kriminologi Maraknya Tawuran Gangster oleh Anak di Era Digital Bayu Rizki Yoga Pratomo; Rasdi Rasdi
Annual Review of Legal Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/arls.vol2i2.25873

Abstract

The phenomenon of inter-gang brawls among teenagers, particularly those involving children in Indonesia, has become a complex and serious social issue. This research provides an in-depth criminological analysis of the prevalence of these brawls, focusing on the digital era's role in shaping and accelerating the dynamics of this deviant behavior. The study identifies both internal and external causal factors. Internally, involved adolescents often experience an identity crisis, possess weak self-control, and struggle with environmental adjustment. Their inability to manage emotions and seek positive recognition pushes them to find outlets in deviant groups. Externally, unfavorable family environments and the influence of deviant peer groups are significant contributing factors. What distinguishes this modern phenomenon is the catalytic role of digital technology, especially social media. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok have become primary arenas for provocation, challenges, and coordination of brawls, even enabling live broadcasts that can influence other adolescents to participate. The lack of parental supervision over children's social media use exacerbates these negative impacts. To address this, a comprehensive approach is necessary, encompassing pre-emptive (early prevention), preventive (ongoing prevention), and repressive (law enforcement with rehabilitation) efforts. This approach involves families, schools, communities, and law enforcement agencies, with an emphasis on restorative justice for children in conflict with the law.
Community Service Order in Indonesia: Between Alternatives and Transformation in the Reconstruction of the Penal System Didik Purnomo; Anis Widyawati; Bhanu Prakash Nunna; Rasdi Rasdi; Muhammad Azil Maskur
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v11i1.34493

Abstract

The integration of community service orders into the national criminal justice system indicates a shift away from a punitive approach dominated by incarceration toward the use of non-custodial sanctions more oriented toward rehabilitation and social reintegration. Nevertheless, studies systematically linking normative constructions, institutional readiness, and the community's role in their implementation remain relatively limited. This study aims to analyze the normative construction and institutional readiness for the application of community service as a substitute for short-term imprisonment, and to assess its consistency with criminal justice reform in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and comparative approach, through an analysis of national legal regulations and practices in several countries that have institutionalized community service orders. The results of the study show that although the normative framework is relatively comprehensive, its implementation effectiveness is greatly influenced by the consistency of judges' decisions, the readiness of the supervision and guidance system, and the level of collaboration between law enforcement officers and the community. The main challenge lies in the limitations of probation infrastructure and the tendency of a still prison-oriented penal culture. This study offers an innovation in the form of an integrative framework that links normative design, institutional capacity, and social participation as prerequisites for effective implementation. Thus, community service orders can be understood not only as an alternative to imprisonment but also as a policy instrument that can support the development of a penal system that is more proportional, rehabilitative, and oriented towards social reintegration.