Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.055
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudentie Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum DE'RECHTSSTAAT JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Kosmik Hukum Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam Journal Presumption of Law
Otong Syuhada
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Majalengka
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Dentistry Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurisprudentie

 1 
Legal Analysis TikTok Shop Restrictions through Evaluation Minister Trade Regulation No. 31 2023 Asep Kiki Riady; Otong Syuhada; Herry Farhan Syafiq
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 1 Juni 2025
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i1.58969

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of restrictions on TikTok Shop in Indonesia through an evaluation of Minister of Trade Regulation No. 31 of 2023. The main focus of this study is to identify the clarity of legal norms governing the social commerce business model, measure the consistency of regulations with the principles of business and consumer protection, and assess the effectiveness of policy implementation in digital trade practices. The method used is a normative legal approach with literature review and case analysis of the closure of TikTok Shop in October 2023 as a concrete illustration of regulatory implementation. The research findings indicate that although these policies are intended to protect the local market and prevent monopolistic practices, there is ambiguity in technical definitions and weak coordination among regulatory agencies, leading to inconsistent implementation. Additionally, the impact on SMEs and consumers highlights the need for more inclusive transition policies and more adaptive legal instruments. This study suggests revising regulations to address the legal challenges posed by technological innovation and to create a fair and sustainable digital trade ecosystem. Keywords: E-commerce, Digital trade regulation, Tiktok shop
Analisis Wanprestasi dalam Penggunaan TikTok PayLater menurut perspektif UUPK 1999 dan Hukum Perdata Putri Ayudhiya, Rubila; Syuhada, Otong; Pribadi, Riky
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 2 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 2 Desember 2025 (In Press)
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i2.62375

Abstract

Technological developments are increasing, one of which is marked by the existence of e-commerce and fintech to facilitate transactions for the public. In this modern era, people are more interested in online transactions such as buying and selling. TikTok Shop is one of the applications widely used by Indonesians. One of the payment methods on TikTok Shop is TikTok PayLater. This study uses an empirical juridical research method, which examines the applicable legal provisions and what actually happens in society. This study uses a qualitative approach based on a review of the PayLater contract, interest structure, administration fees, and late payment penalties. The data collection technique in this study was obtained through interviews with seven informants who are active users of TikTok PayLater. The results of the study show that the TikTok PayLater agreement is legally valid because it complies with Article 1320 of the Civil Code and is recognised by the ITE Law. The TikTok PayLater agreement includes a standard agreement, the content of which is still limited by the provisions of Article 18 of Law 1999. However, in practice, it still has the potential to cause disputes due to default as regulated in Article 1243 of the Civil Code. However, such collection practices violate Article 4 of the 1999 Consumer Protection Law as they infringe upon consumers' rights to comfort and security. Therefore, the use of TikTok PayLater requires responsibility from both parties.
Co-Authors Aji Halim Rahman Asep Kiki Riady Farid, Diana Gentar Restu Halim, Aji Hendriana Hendriana, Hendriana Herry Farhan Syafiq Hisham, Ikmal Ikmal Hisham Kusmayadi, Dodi Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti Nawang, Nazli Ismail Nazli Ismail Nawang Nita Ariyanti Pribadi, Riky Putri Ayudhiya, Rubila Rani Dewi Kurniawati Razali, Rodziana Mohamed Rica Hardyanti Riky Pribadi Sofyan Mei Utama, Sofyan Mei Sopian, Azkia Fathia Kirana Zuraidah