Rofiana, Reine
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku pembuat Konten Perjudian Online Berbasis Live Streaming Alhasani, Ahmad Ghifari; Ridwan, Ridwan; Rofiana, Reine
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v5i1.31489

Abstract

This research aims to find out about live streaming-based online gambling content in criminal law and to find out the criminal liability of the perpetrators of live streaming-based online gambling content. This research method uses normative juridical research methods, with the research specifications used are the statutory approach, the news approach regarding online gambling and the case approach. The data source used is secondary data which consists of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, with literature study data collection techniques. The results of the research obtained are that online gambling content in criminal law is a criminal offense because it fulfills the elements of a criminal offense and there are regulations regarding gambling located in Articles 303 and 303bis of the Criminal Code, Article 426, Article 427 of Law No. 1 of 2023 and Article 27 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law. As for criminal liability regarding online gambling content creators, it is still arguably quite a few who can be held accountable. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai konten perjudian online berbasis live streaming dalam hukum pidana serta untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku pembuat konten perjudian online berbasis live streaming. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan berita mengenai perjudian online dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang didalamnya terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier, dengan Teknik pengumpulan data studi Pustaka. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan yaitu konten perjudian online dalam hukum pidana termasuk tindak pidana karena memenuhi unsur-unsur tindak pidana dan ada peraturan tentang perjudian terletak pada Pasal 303 dan 303bis KUHP, Pasal 426, Pasal 427 UU No 1 Tahun 2023 dan Pasal 27 ayat (2) UU ITE. Sedangkan untuk  pertanggungjawaban pidana mengenai pembuat konten perjudian online ini masih dibilang cukup sedikit yang dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban.  
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terdahap Kapal Asing Yang Melakukan Illegal, Unreported And Unregulated Fishing Di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia: Studi Kasus Do Thanh Nhan (Kapal Vietnam) Rofiana, Reine; Mohas, Muhyi; Mega Jaya, Belardo Prasetya
JATISWARA Vol. 39 No. 1 (2024): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jtsw.v39i1.474

Abstract

Illegal, Unreported And Unregulated Fishing (IUU Fishing) yang dilakukan oleh kapal asing masih sering terjadi di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia (ZEEI). Salah satunya Dalam perkara perikanan yang dilakukan oleh Do Thanh Nhan, telah terbukti tidak memiliki Surat Izin Penangkapan Ikan (SIPI) serta diketahui telah menggunakan alat penangkapan ikan yang dilarang. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana ketentuan dan unsur IUU Fishing dan bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi kapal asing yang melakukan IUU Fishing di ZEEI : Studi Kasus Do Thanh Nhan (Kapal Vietnam). Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Ketentuan dan unsur IUU Fishing diatur dalam hukum internasional maupun hukum nasional. Do Thanh Nhan, WNA dari Vietnam yang melakukan IUU Fishing di ZEEI diberikan Pidana Denda atau disebut uang jaminan yang layak (reasonable bound) sebesar Rp. 200.000.000 tanpa dilengkapi dengan pidana penjara maupun pidana kurungan pengganti denda. Hal tersebut sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 73 UNCLOS 1982 dan Pasal 102 Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 2004 tentang Perikanan sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 45 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2004 tentang Perikanan yang menyatakan bahwa ketentuan tentang pidana penjara dalam Undang-Undang ini tidak berlaku bagi tindak pidana di bidang perikanan yang terjadi di ZEE Indonesia. Ketentuan tersebut juga diatur dalam SEMA Tahun 2015 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2015 sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan serta di Putusan Kasasi Nomor 1206 K/ Pid.Sus/ 2015 tanggal 23 Februari 2016.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL Pratiwi, Norma Risca; Ridwan, Ridwan; Rofiana, Reine
Khairun Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1, September 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Abstract

In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL Pratiwi, Norma Risca; Ridwan, Ridwan; Rofiana, Reine
Khairun Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1, September 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Abstract

In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.
Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Penangkapan Ananda Badudu Sebagai Penggalang Donasi (Crowdfunding) Mohas, Muhyi; Rofiana, Reine; Mega Jaya, Belardo Prasetya
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 7, No 2 (2022): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v7i2.5004

Abstract

This study aims to examine the criminal law provisions governing the arrest of Ananda Badudu as a crowdfunding-based fundraiser, as well as the criminal law defenses for Ananda Badudu as a crowdfunding-based fundraiser. The novelty of this study is to analyze the legal protection of the Anand Badudu case as a fundraiser on student protest in 2019. This study was conducted utilizing a normative legal approach. The result of this research are: The arrest of Ananda Badudu by the police was an arbitrary act as it was not in accordance with the provision contained therein The Code of Criminal Procedure as well as the Chief of Police Regulation that has resulted in a violation of human rights. That act alone is considered arbitrary and Ananda Badudu must get legal protection in accordance with the laws and regulations. One of the grounds why legal protection must be pledged is to create legal certainty.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji mengenai ketentuan hukum pidana tentang penangkapan Ananda Badudu sebagai penggalang donasi berbasis crowdfunding dan mengkaji tentang perlindungan hukum pidana terhadap Ananda Badudu sebagai penggalangan donasi berbasis crowdfunding. Kebaharuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum kasus Ananda Badudu sebagai fundraiser dalam kegiatan crowdfunding pada aksi mahasiswa tahun 2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: Penangkapan yang dilakukan oleh polisi terhadap Ananda Badudu tidak sesuai dengan prosedur yang sudah diatur di dalam undang-undang baik di dalam KUHAP maupun Perkapolri, sehingga menyebabkan suatu pelanggaran hak asasi manusia dan merupakan perbuatan sewenang-wenang serta Ananda Badudu harus mendapatkan perlindungan hukum sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Salah satu alasan mengapa perlindungan hukum harus diberikan ialah agar menciptakan suatu kepastian hukum.      
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAKAN PIDANA PENIPUAN DOKTER PALSU Sidik, Nabila; Mohas, Muhyi; Rofiana, Reine
Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Vol 20 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Samudra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33059/jhsk.v20i1.10719

Abstract

Penipuan merupakan salah satu bentuk kejahatan yang berkembang seiring dengan pertumbuhan penduduk dan kemajuan ekonomi di Indonesia. Salah satu kasus yang mencuat adalah tindak pidana penipuan dalam pemalsuan identitas sebagai profesi dokter. Kajian ini berfokus pada penerapan hukum dalam kasus tersebut, yang tidak hanya mengacu pada Pasal 378 KUHP tentang penipuan, tetapi juga Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan, khususnya Pasal 439 dan Pasal 441 yang mengatur sanksi terhadap praktik kedokteran tanpa izin dan penggunaan identitas palsu sebagai tenaga medis. Metode penelitian yang diterapkan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, yang dilakukan dengan menelaah bahan hukum pustaka atau data sekunder sebagai sumber utama. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui penelusuran terhadap berbagai peraturan dan literatur yang relevan dengan isu yang menjadi fokus kajian. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 1747/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Sby, terdakwa dijatuhi hukuman pidana penjara selama tiga tahun enam bulan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penerapan sanksi hukum yang tegas sangat diperlukan untuk menciptakan efek jera, melindungi masyarakat, dan menjaga kepercayaan terhadap integritas profesi di bidang tenaga kesehatan.
Criminal Responsibilities of Criminal Trafficking in PerCriminal Responsibilities of Criminal Trafficking in Persons with Mail-Order Bride Mode Between China and Indonesiasons with Mail-Order Bride Mode Between China and Indonesia Rofiana, Reine; Mohas, Muhyi; Mega Jaya, Belardo Prasetya; Solapari, Nuryati; Khairunnisa, Shofia
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 56 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : UINSunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v56i1.994

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses legal provisions regarding the criminal act of trafficking in persons between Indonesia and China with the mail-order bride mode, which has recently occurred in various regions in Indonesia, and the criminal responsibility of the perpetrators of the trafficking in persons. The primary sources of this research are Law No. 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of Human Trafficking, the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, Law No. 13 of 2017 concerning the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China regarding Extradition, and the results of interviews with various party. The secondary sources come from scientific works that study or are related to the object of this research. Using juridical-empirical approach, this study results indicate that the criminal act of trafficking in persons with the order mode of the bride and groom between men with Chinese citizenship and women with Indonesian citizenship was committed by several parties, including Indonesian agents, Chinese agents, mail-order bride service users, and intermediary parties (makcomblang). The perpetrators of the crime of trafficking persons who are in Indonesia can be subject to criminal sanctions as stipulated in Law No. 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of Human Trafficking. Meanwhile, perpetrators who are domiciled in China can be subject to criminal sanctions through extradition based on an extradition agreement between China and Indonesia (July 1, 2009) which has been ratified by Law No. 13 of 2017 concerning the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China regarding Extradition. Abstrak: Artikel ini mengkaji ketentuan hukum tentang tindak pidana perdagangan orang antara Indonesia dan Cina dengan modus pengantin pesanan yang akhir-akhir ini banyak terjadi di berbagai daerah di Indonesia dan  pertanggungjawaban pidana para pelaku tindak pidana perdagangan orang tersebut. Sumber utama penelitian ini adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 tentang Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (TPPO), Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Pengesahan Persetujuan antara Republik Indonesia dengan Republik Rakyat Cina, dan hasil wawancara dengan berbagai pihak. Adapun sumber sekundernya berasal dari karya-karya ilmiah yang mengkaji atau berkaitan dengan objek penelitian ini. Menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-empiris, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tindak pidana perdagangan orang dengan modus pengantin pesanan antara laki-laki berkewarganegaraan Cina dengan perempuan berkewarganegaraan Indonesia dilakukan oleh beberapa pihak, yang meliputi agen Indonesia, agen Cina, pengguna jasa pengantin pesanan, dan pihak perantara (makcomblang). Para pelaku tindak pidana perdagangan orang yang berada di Indonesia ini dapat dikenai sanksi pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 21 tahun 2007 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Sementara para pelaku yang berkedudukan di negara Cina dapat dikenai sanksi pidana melalui pemberlakuan ekstradisi berdasarkan persetujuan ekstradisi antara Cina dan Indonesia (1 Juli 2009) dan telah disahkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Pengesahan Persetujuan antara Republik Indonesia dengan Republik Rakyat Cina. 
Pelaksanaan Pemulihan Aset Oleh Jaksa Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Butarbutar, Andika Demto; Ridwan, Ridwan; Rofiana, Reine
MATAKAO Corruption Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2024): November 2024 MATAKAO Corruption Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Korupsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/matakao.v2i2.14356

Abstract

Introduction: Asset recovery in corruption cases has not been maximized in its implementation, this can be seen from existing cases, asset recovery from state losses incurred is still not maximum, this can be proven in Indonesian records. The prosecutor as a law enforcer has the authority to recover assets by carrying out activities to trace, confiscate and return assets obtained from criminal acts as regulated in Article 30A of Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Purposes of the Research: to find out how the implementation of asset recovery carried out by the prosecutor in resolving corruption crimes? and What are the problems of the prosecutor in recovering assets from the proceeds of corruption crimes? Methods of the Research: The research method used in this article is in the form of normative juridical, The specifications in this article are descriptive-analytical. Results of the Research: The results of the research obtained by the author are that in the implementation of asset recovery carried out by the Prosecutor's Office, there are two methods carried out by the prosecutor in carrying out asset recovery, namely the investigation method and the asset tracking method, and the author finds various problems owned by the prosecutor in carrying out asset recovery. The conclusion is that in the implementation of the recovery of the prosecutor's assets, it has not been maximized to the return of state losses.