Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Welding Technology Eksergi: Jurnal Teknik Energi
Anggara, Dika
Unknown Affiliation
Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of the Effect of PWHT on the Corrosion Test of API 5L X65 Material in Submerged Arc Welding Kusminah, Imah Luluk; Anggara, Dika; Wardani, Dianita; Widodo, Eriek Wahyu Restu; Nafi, Maula; Handoko, Lukman; Djati, Anggoro Ludiro; Trianto, Ryo Andika
Eksergi Vol. 20 No. 03 (2024): SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32497/eksergi.v20i03.5828

Abstract

This research discusses the method of making distribution pipes using the Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) welding process, especially for pipes with spiral connections. The material used is API 5L X65. SAW pipes with spiral joints are more commonly used for low-pressure piping systems. However, in certain cases, the production of SAW pipes for Sour Service distribution requires special treatment. Sour Service pipes have a high level of corrosion and residual stress, so Post Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT) is required to prevent Hydrogen Induced Cracking (HIC). HIC occurs due to the absorption and accumulation of hydrogen gas in the metal, causing the formation and growth of cracks, which is also influenced by residual stress. PWHT is applied to reduce residual stress to reduce the risk of corrosion. PWHT is a process to change the structure of the weld metal by heating the metal at a certain temperature and time. This research shows that variations in PWHT temperature produce an average residual stress that is not much different with less difference than 2%, In corrosion testing with the HIC method shows crack evidence but is still satisfactory NACE MR0175 criteria for pipe PWHT temperature variation conditions.
Analysis of variations in the number of layers of hardfacing overlay ABREX 500 material on hardness,impact strength and microstructure with the SMAW process Amri, Moh. Syaiful; Anggara, Dika; rohmat, Imam Khoirul; Kurniyanto, Hendri Budi; Pradana, Dika Septya
Journal of Welding Technology Vol 5, No 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30811/jowt.v5i2.4286

Abstract

Hardfacing is a welding technique that functions to increase the surface hardness value of a material. Generally, hardfacing is done on low-carbon steel materials because low-carbon steel cannot be increased in hardness by heat treatment. For this reason, research will be carried out on the multilayer hardfacing process with the aim of obtaining optimal layer hardness. The methodology in this research is that multilayer hardfacing welding will be carried out consisting of 3 layers, 4 layers, and 5 layers, and each specimen has 2 buffer layer layers with E 309 electrodes for the hardfacing layer using HV 600 electrodes. This research reveals the influence of the number of layers of hardfacing on the hardness and toughness values. ABREX 500 material with a size of 150x150x10 mm was welded using the SMAW process using a current of 130 A. In this research, hardness and toughness tests were carried out. On test results. The base metal microstructure is dominated by a tempered martensite structure with a small amount of bainite and pearlite. In the structural area of the support layer, austenite and vermicular ferrite dominate. In the hardfacing layer area, austenite and vermicular ferrite, which are in dendritic form, dominate. The increase in hardness will occur significantly after hardfacing is carried out on the base metal. In a specimen, the more layers of hardfacing are added, the harder the material will be. The hardness of the specimen in 5 layers gets the most optimal value (higher) when compared with the hardness in 3 layers and 4 layers. In the 5-layer specimen, the resulting hardness value was 482.13 kgf/mm2, for the 4-layer specimen, the average value was 464.83 kgf/mm2, and in the 3-layer specimen, the hardness value was 444.13 kgf/mm2. For toughness testing, the highest toughness value was obtained, namely 1.32 (J/mm2) for the 3 layers specimen, compared to 4 layers with a toughness value of 1.25 (J/mm2) and 5 layer with a toughness value of 1.19 (J/mm2). The toughness value decreases as the hardness value increases.
Co-Authors Dianita Wardani Djati, Anggoro Ludiro Eriek Wahyu Restu Widodo Imam Khoirul Rohmat Kurniyanto, Hendri Budi Kusminah, Imah Luluk Lukman Handoko Maula Nafi Moh. Syaiful Amri Pradana, Dika Septya Trianto, Ryo Andika