Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.633
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam JURNAL KARSA (Terakreditasi No. 80/DIKTI/Kep/2012) ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies KARSA: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture) NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies SUHUF: Jurnal Pengkajian Al-Qur'an dan Budaya Maghza: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur'an and Tafsir Journal Of Computer Science And Technology Nuansa: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Al-Bidayah : jurnal pendidikan dasar Islam Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman DAAR EL-KAMIL: Multidisciplinary Journal
Ah. Fawaid Ah. Fawaid
IAIN Madura
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : DAAR EL-KAMIL: Multidisciplinary Journal

 1 
Approaches to Understanding Hadiths on Wearing Garments Below the Ankles (A Study of Mukhtalif al-Hadith) Zaenal Arifin; Rahmat Zubandi Thahir; Ahmad Fawaid
DAAR EL-KAMIL: Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 1 No 02 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) of Institut Badri Mashduqi Probolinggo Jawa timur Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66931/jmlt.v1.i02.32

Abstract

This study examines approaches to understanding hadiths concerning the practice of wearing garments below the ankles (isbāl) through the framework of mukhtalif al-hadith. The issue of isbāl has generated diverse scholarly interpretations due to the presence of seemingly divergent prophetic narrations, some of which convey unconditional prohibition while others explicitly link the prohibition to moral intentions such as arrogance and pride. This research employs a qualitative library-based methodology, analyzing primary hadith collections alongside classical and contemporary scholarly works to explore patterns of interpretation and methodological reasoning.The findings reveal that hadiths on isbāl can be classified into two main textual categories: unconditional prohibitions and intention-based condemnations. Divergent legal conclusions among scholars are shown to stem primarily from methodological orientations rather than from disagreements over hadith authenticity. Scholars adopting literal-textual approaches tend to uphold a general prohibition, whereas those employing contextual and reconciliatory methods emphasize harmonization (al-jam‘ wa al-tawfīq) by interpreting the narrations within their ethical and socio-historical contexts.This study further demonstrates that ethical orientation emerges as the central interpretive outcome of isbāl hadiths. The prophetic guidance consistently prioritizes moral values such as humility, social equality, and the avoidance of arrogance over rigid formal regulation of dress length. By integrating textual classification, methodological analysis, and ethical interpretation, this research contributes to contemporary hadith studies by offering a coherent framework for addressing cases of mukhtalif al-hadith and reinforcing the relevance of ethical coherence in responsible and contextual hadith interpretation.
The Sociological Approach in Qur’anic Interpretation: An Analysis of Fazlur Rahman’s Double Movement Method Abd Wahid; Usman; Ahmad Fawaid
DAAR EL-KAMIL: Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 1 No 02 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) of Institut Badri Mashduqi Probolinggo Jawa timur Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66931/jmlt.v1.i02.209

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the sociological approach in Qur’anic interpretation through the double movement method developed by Fazlur Rahman. The focus of the study is directed toward three main issues: first, the methodological framework of the double movement in the process of Qur’anic interpretation; second, the ways in which this method represents a sociological approach to the Qur’an; and third, the extent to which the double movement method is relevant for analyzing contemporary social problems. This research employs a qualitative approach with a library-based research design, using primary data from Fazlur Rahman’s works and scholarly journal articles that discuss contextual and social approaches to Qur’anic interpretation. Data analysis is conducted through descriptive-analytical techniques and contextual hermeneutical analysis. The findings indicate that the double movement method has a systematic methodological framework, consisting of an interpretive movement from the socio-historical context of revelation toward the formulation of universal moral principles, followed by an applicative movement that projects these principles into contemporary social contexts. This method represents a sociological approach to the Qur’an by emphasizing the analysis of social realities as a fundamental basis for understanding the text, thereby positioning the Qur’an as a revelation that actively engages with human social problems. Furthermore, the double movement method is highly relevant for analyzing various modern social issues, such as social justice, pluralism, gender relations, and public ethics, as it effectively bridges the normative values of the Qur’an with the dynamics of modern society.
HERMENEUTIC INTERPRETATION OF THE HADITH ON ONE INTESTINE AND SEVEN INTESTINES: AN ETHICAL PERSPECTIVE ON CONSUMPTION IN ISLAM Maimun, Muhamad; Helmi; Ahmad Fawaid
DAAR EL-KAMIL: Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 1 No 02 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) of Institut Badri Mashduqi Probolinggo Jawa timur Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66931/jmlt.v1.i02.252

Abstract

This study discusses the phenomenon of Musykil al-Ḥadīth (hadiths that appear contradictory or are difficult to understand textually) concerning the difference in eating patterns between believers and disbelievers, symbolized by the expressions “one intestine” and “seven intestines.” Through a hermeneutical approach grounded in classical Islamic scholarship, this article explains that such wording functions as a metaphor for zuhd (asceticism) and self-restraint. The findings indicate that the essence of this hadith is an injunction toward qana’ah (contentment) and a warning against the harmful effects of greed on both physical and spiritual health. To uncover the intended meaning of the hadith, this research employs a hermeneutical method by referring to the sharḥ (commentaries) of prominent scholars. Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī emphasizes that the expression should not be understood literally (biologically), but rather as a tamsīl (figurative illustration). Imam al-Nawawī explains that the hadith serves as motivation to minimize excessive attachment to worldly pleasures. Meanwhile, Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr views the hadith as praise for believers who are able to restrain their worldly desires. The core of this study concludes that “one intestine” represents the values of zuhd and qana’ah. A believer is expected to take sustenance only as needed, whether in food, clothing, or work. The fundamental principle is “eating to live” in order to maintain strength for worship, rather than “living to eat” to satisfy desire. Contentment (qana’ah) is thus regarded as a key to success for a Muslim. The research also examines the sociological and health impacts of excessive consumption (greed). Based on the studied materials on consumption ethics, Islam regulates that the stomach should not be filled completely; the ideal division is one-third for food, one-third for drink, and one-third for breathing. Regarding spiritual and physical impacts, excessive satiety, according to Imam al-Shāfi‘ī, can harden the heart, diminish intelligence, cause lethargy, and weaken enthusiasm for worship.  
Co-Authors Abd Wahid Achmad Jazuli Affandi Al Ithriyah, Hanaa Fadhilah, Mutik Helmi Ikha Yuliati Khoirul Anas Maimun, Muhamad Moh. Hafidul Ahkam Muhammad Ali Ridla Musrifah, Muhimmatus Sa'adah Nailatur Rahmah RAHMAT ZUBANDI THAHIR Raudlatun Raudlatun Ulya Fikriyati, Ulya Usman Zaenal Arifin