Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.958
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sistemasi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi INTECOMS: Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi JOISIE (Journal Of Information Systems And Informatics Engineering) EDUMATIC: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Building of Informatics, Technology and Science
Anofrizen Anofrizen
Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Computer Science & IT Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : EDUMATIC: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika

 1 
Quality Evaluation of The SITASI Final Project System using Selected McCall Software Quality Factors Adillah, Suci Nur; Ahsyar, Tengku Khairil; Syaifullah, Syaifullah; Anofrizen, Anofrizen; Marsal, Arif
Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika (EDUMATIC) Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/edumatic.v9i2.30675

Abstract

The Final Project Information System (SITASI) was developed to support academic administration processes. However, performance and usability issues continue to hinder its effectiveness, particularly during peak usage. This study aims to evaluate the quality of SITASI using the McCall Software Quality Model by focusing on five relevant operational factors: correctness, reliability, efficiency, integrity, and usability. The research employed a descriptive quantitative approach by distributing a validated user perception questionnaire to 72 students with active experience using SITASI. The instrument was tested for validity and reliability, with data analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques to evaluate the quality of the SITASI system. The results show that usability scored the highest at 86%, followed by correctness at 67.6%, reliability at 64.2%, integrity at 50.8%, and efficiency at 43.5%. These findings reveal strong user interface performance but expose technical limitations in speed and data security. The study concludes that while SITASI performs well in terms of usability, it requires substantial improvements in system responsiveness and integrity features. The results offer a structured evaluation of software quality and provide practical recommendations for developers to optimize performance and strengthen data protection. This study contributes a replicable framework for evaluating academic information systems in higher education environments.
Evaluating User Experience of SITASI System using HEART Metrics and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) Harmaniola, Elsa; Ahsyar, Tengku Khairil; Syaifullah, Syaifullah; Anofrizen, Anofrizen; Marsal, Arif
Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika (EDUMATIC) Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/edumatic.v9i2.30691

Abstract

SITASI is a web-based system developed to help students manage references and citations for their final projects. Despite its importance, no comprehensive evaluation of the system’s user experience (UX) had been conducted. This study aims to evaluate the UX of SITASI used by students of the Information Systems Study Programme at UIN Suska Riau. Using a quantitative survey method, data were collected from 72 active students from the 2018-2021 cohorts through an online questionnaire. The evaluation was based on the five HEART Metrics dimensions: Happiness, Engagement, Adoption, Retention, and Task Success. Respondents were selected through random sampling using the Slovin formula. Data were analysed using SPSS version 30 for validity, reliability, and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). The HEART results indicated high usability levels across all dimensions, with Happiness and Retention scoring highest (73%) and Engagement lowest (70%). IPA showed an average suitability of 92%, with four indicators placed in Quadrant I, signifying urgent areas for improvement. These results serve as a foundation for actionable recommendations to enhance system satisfaction, improve performance, and develop a more user-centered and adaptive SITASI platform.
Co-Authors Adillah, Suci Nur Ahsyar, T. Khairil Ahsyar, Tengku Khairil Anmi, Fauzi Hidayatul Aprillia, Dhea Dwi Aprillia, Dhea Dwi Arif Marsal Asyraf, Fajri Muhammad Eki Saputra Hamzah, Muhammad Luthfi Harmaniola, Elsa Intan, Sri Jazman, Muhammad M Afdal Megawati - Mona Fronita, Mona Ningrum, Meriana Prihati Prananda, Yaldri Oktra Putra, Ahdika Sawiyya Raditya, Muhammad Zacky Raihan, Muhammad Ramadhan, Rifky Siregar, Syafril Syaifullah Syaifullah Yulianti, Nelvi Zarnelly Zarnelly