Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

IDENTIFICATION AND MAPPING OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CRITERIA IN DECISION-MAKING FOR THE SELECTION OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES USING THE DEMATEL METHOD Ervin Nurdiansyah; Udisubakti Ciptomulyono; Sutrisno Sutrisno; Wawan Kusdiana
STTAL POSTGRADUATE - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Vol 7 No 01 (2023): Indonesia Naval Technology College STTAL Postgraduate International Conference -
Publisher : Indonesian Naval Technology College STTAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Decision-making is the process of selecting from several alternatives. Decision-making in selecting an alternative is a series of long processes, starting with identifying problems, seeking information about the alternatives to be selected, and analyzing how good each alternative is, leading to alternative decisions to be made. At the stage of identifying the criteria of an alternative, it is not only about identifying these criteria but also knowing the interrelationships between the criteria of the alternative to be selected. The DEMATEL method is one of the methods in multi-criteria decision-making that can be used to identify the interrelationships between criteria. In this study, calculations were carried out using the DEMATEL method to identify twenty criteria used in the selection of unmanned aircraft. From the results of this study, the DEMATEL method was able to identify and describe the relationship between the criteria quantitatively in the form of a table of the number of relationships and an impact-digraph map. The results of this study indicate that of the twenty criteria, four of the most influential criteria were obtained in the decision-making process for selecting an unmanned aircraft, with the payload criteria being the most influential criterion with the largest value of 0.412, followed by the political criteria in second place with a value of 0.356, while the endurance criteria and range are in third and fourth place on the four criteria that most influence the decision-making process for selecting an unmanned aircraft with a value of 0.355 and 0.341, respectively. Keywords: Decision Making, MCDM, UAV, and DEMATEL
The decision making analysis of increasing storage capacity of sutami reservoir with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach BAMBANG GUTOMO; UDISUBAKTI CIPTOMULYONO; EKOBUDI SANTOSO
Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 3 (2019): JARSSH
Publisher : Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Aim: This research aims to use the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique, a form of multi-criteria decision-making, to rank the relative merits of potential courses of action. Through pairwise comparisons based on importance levels, AHP unites different individuals’ qualitative, subjective evaluations into a collective evaluation of decision-making.Method: In this study, we will draw from existing literature on water resource management and planning to establish our criteria and sub-criteria. Experts in a dam, reservoir, and water resource management use FGD to finalize criteria/sub-criteria because of a knowledge gap between the two sets of studies. After collecting data from the FGDs, the criteria and sub-criteria are used in an AHP to rank a set of potential solutions.Findings: The following is the outcome of applying weights to the pairwise comparisons we conducted using the criteria of social, environmental, technical, and economic aspects: With 36.2% of the vote, the option of raising the dam body by 5 meters is deemed most important. In terms of alternatives, a 0.5-meter-higher spillway comes in second with a weight of 25.7%, while dredging sediments to the same depth as sediment inflow comes in third with a weight of 20.5%, and maintaining the current configuration receives the least amount of weight at 17.7%.Implications/Novel Contribution: All stakeholders must back and contribute to the development of research aimed at extending the useful life of existing reservoirs. It is common knowledge that all reservoirs have a finite amount of time before they must be shut down. Old, inefficient reservoirs are expensive to keep up and close. However, a new dam will not come cheap, and finding a suitable site is uncertain.