Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.288
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Corruptio Reformasi Hukum International Journal of Law Dynamics Review Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LamLaj indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government (IJALGOV)
Murtadho, Nazhif Ali
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Double Standards in International Legal Politics in the Settlement of Violations of Human Rights to the Rohingya Ethnic Maziyyah, Rifdatul; Shohihah, Millatus; Syndo, Sivana Amanda Diamita; Murtadho, Nazhif Ali
International Journal of Law Dynamics Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): May
Publisher : Nursyam Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62039/ijldr.v1i1.1

Abstract

This article aims to identify the resolution of gross human rights violations against the Rohingya ethnic group who have been discriminated of the Myanmar Military Junta Government. The international community and political response are giving pressure and criticism about upheaval against the settlement of violations against the Rohingya. The Myanmar government rejection of accusations of gross human rights violations can be seen from the international double standards towards the settlement of the Rohingya case. This article uses the library research method, and critical analysis to understand the settlement of human rights violations against the Rohingya. The conclusion is Discrimination against this ethnic can be considered by international human rights law as a gross violation of human rights, even though Myanmar has legal arrangements for protecting human rights in force in its country. International human rights law as a political instrument has powerful in efforts to create quality international policy products including guaranteeing the implementation of respect for human rights in the world through the role of international institutions as guardians in the process of enforcing human rights violations committed by a country through various strategic steps both repressive, preventive and curative. Discrimination against the Rohingya can be seen in the application of double standards by several countries such as the Western block countries, where they seem to keep quiet about these human rights violations.
Legal Status Options in the Legitimation of Out-of-Wedlock Children in Mixed Marriages Murtadho, Nazhif Ali
Reformasi Hukum Vol 29 No 1 (2025): April Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1158

Abstract

Mixed-nationality marriages between Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals create legal uncertainty for children born out of wedlock regarding citizenship, inheritance rights, and property ownership. This study aims to analyze the mechanisms of adoption, acknowledgment, and legitimation and their implications for legal certainty and the protection of children’s rights. Employing a normative doctrinal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research draws on primary and secondary legal materials. Our findings reveal that the legal status of children born out of wedlock depends on the validity of the parents’ marriage and paternal acknowledgment: the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) provides erkenning and legitimation mechanisms to secure inheritance rights, while Law No. 12/2006 and Ministerial Regulation No. 10/2023 allow for limited dual citizenship following formal acknowledgment, though practical implementation remains hindered by administrative and procedural obstacles. We conclude that formal paternal acknowledgment is an absolute prerequisite for ensuring children’s identity, citizenship, and civil-law rights; therefore, regulatory harmonization and simplification of administrative procedures are needed to prevent statelessness and guarantee non-discrimination in accordance with the best-interests-of-the-child principle.  
Klitih Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Klitih dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Islam : Indonesia Harefa, Safaruddin; Maziyyah, Rifdatul; Murtadho, Nazhif Ali; Syatta, Indy Mafiiqo; Diamita Syndo, Sivana Amanda
Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/jf.v12i1.83

Abstract

Klitih berawal dari bahasa jawa yang bermakna sebuah aktivitas guna mencari angin di luar rumah. Namun, arti klitih yang dimaksud pada zaman dahulu ialah jalan-jalan guna mengisi waktu luang yang dalam bahasa jawa dianggap jalan-jalan untuk nglaras, akan tetapi seiring berjalannya waktu arti klitih bergeser menjadi sebuah tindak pidana yang menyerang seseorang secara acak. Tujuan dari penelitihan ini adalah untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum pada tindak pidana klitih dan menganalisis tindak pidana klitih dalam hukum pidana islam. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitihan dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normative dengan mengunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute aproach) dan pendapat doktrin. Hasil penelitian ini berupa penerapan hukuman bagi tindak pidana klitih yang masih belum optimal karena terdapat peningkatan jumlah kasus selama kurun waktu tiga tahun terakhir. Hal tersebut menimbulkan keresahan dikalangan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu peneliti menganalisis pertama, mengenai kasus tindak pidana Klitih, dalam doktrin pidana telah memenuhi dua unsur perbuatan pidana antara lain objektif (actus reus) dan subjektif (mens rea). Perlu diketahui bahwa kedua unsur tersebut bersifat mutlak, artinya tidak dapat dipisahkan dan merupakan satu kesatuan yang tidak dapat dipisahkan. Dan juga penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana klitih haruslah berorientasi pada korban. mengenai penegakan hukum pada tindak pidana klitih yang mana perlu adanya kajian lebih lanjut terkait hukumannya karena hukuman yang selama ini diterapkan tidak menimbulkan efek jera pada pelaku; kedua dalam pandangan pidana islam sendiri pelaku pidana klitih dapat dikenai hukuman pokok berupa qishas, maupun hukuman tambahan berupa diyat dan ta’zir dengan didasarkan pada akibat yang ditimbulkan terhadap korban
Reassessing Nepotism: Wederrechtelijk and Onrechtmatige Daad in Indonesian Law Murtadho, Nazhif Ali; Warjiyati, Sri
Corruptio Vol 5 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v5i2.4088

Abstract

This research examines nepotism as a form of Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism (KKN), which has significantly undermined social and institutional order in Indonesia. The problem stems from the negative impacts of KKN on community welfare, resource misuse, and the erosion of public integrity and morals. The main goal of the paper is to analyze nepotism from a positive legal perspective by exploring the conceptual differences between "onrechtmatige daad" in civil law and "wederrechtelijk" in criminal law. The study uses a doctrinal approach that integrates conceptual, statutory, and case analysis, focusing on Law Number 28 of 1999 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 as key case studies. Through evaluative, argumentative, and prescriptive techniques, the research develops arguments concerning the classification of nepotism as either a criminal or civil matter. The findings highlight that while both legal concepts—onrechtmatige daad and wederrechtelijk—serve to protect individual rights and public interests, they are applied differently. The study concludes that nepotism, which has caused systemic harm to fair and transparent governance, should be classified as a criminal act (wederrechtelijk) to ensure legal certainty and maximize the repressive effects of the law, adhering to the principles of lex scripta, lex certa, and lex stricta. As a recommendation, the government and the DPR should revise Law Number 28 of 1999 to strengthen the norms regarding nepotism and submit a material review to the Constitutional Court to align the law with the principle of legality, ensuring optimal protection of the public interest.
Structure and Classification of Legal Norms: Institutional Challenges in Law Making Murtadho, Nazhif Ali; Reni Andreyani; Ryszhard Ken Sakti; Nizar Rahmatullah; Yusya Rugaya Salsabilah; Watae, Suleman
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 1 No. 01 (2024): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v1i01.35853

Abstract

This research analyzes how the institutional testing of legal norms in Indonesia, specifically discussing the institutional problems. This research is a normative legal study with the approaches used being the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The study results indicate that several issues, including the arrangement, structuring, classification of norms, and how to regulate the hierarchy of legal norms, have been identified. Legal norms are fundamentally very close to the values believed by society, but the strength of the law's enforceability has not yet been able to detach itself from the institutional power, so law, society, and power are elements of a social order. Therefore, law should not only be understood as a norm that guarantees satisfaction and justice but also must be viewed from the perspective of justice and utility. The conclusion of this research is that legal norms essentially begin with planning, preparation, drafting techniques, formulation, discussion, approval, promulgation, and dissemination.
Harmonisation of criminal policy on corruption offences in the criminal justice system in Indonesia Murtadho, Nazhif Ali; Ramadhan, Muhammad Galuh Pamungkas Wahyu
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 11 No 2 (2025): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v11i2.1588

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia remains entrenched due to fragmented criminal policies that separate formal criminal sanctions from informal social controls, thereby weakening comprehensive anti-corruption efforts. This paper examines the need to harmonise Criminal Policy, rooted in UNCAC ratification and legislative reform, with Non-Penal Policy, which relies on public awareness, informal sanctions, and cultural norms. Using doctrinal legal research with statutory and comparative approaches, the study analyses national legislation, UNCAC provisions, and best practices in criminalising bribery in the private sector. The findings indicate that although UNCAC ratification through Law No. 7/2006 modernised formal sanctions and introduced non-mandatory offences, gaps persist in the regulation of corporate bribery and a lack of systematic non-criminal measures, producing policy dissonance. The study demonstrates that integrating ISO 37001 standards, non-penal asset forfeiture, public integrity education, and community engagement can bridge these gaps. The researcher concludes that an integrated criminal policy incorporating clear criminal definitions, preventive education, and robust social sanctions is essential for sustainable corruption control. Accordingly, the paper recommends legislative amendments to fully criminalise private-sector bribery, institutionalise non-penal strategies, and establish coordinated oversight mechanisms to promote a cohesive, adaptive, and equitable anti-corruption framework.  
Curator's Responsibility for Errors in the Administration of Bankrupt Estate that Causes Losses to Creditors Warjiyati, Sri; Murtadho, Nazhif Ali; Salsabila, Natasya Vernanda Putri
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v10i2.234

Abstract

This research discusses the Curator's responsibility in managing and settling the assets of a bankrupt debtor, especially when the Curator's negligence causes losses to creditors. Bankruptcy is often the last resort for companies facing financial difficulties. Based on Law no. 37 of 2004, the Curator has the authority to manage and settle bankruptcy assets under the supervision of a judge. However, the crucial role of the Curator also raises the risk of abuse of authority which is detrimental to creditors. This research uses normative legal methods with deductive analysis techniques, examining legal aspects related to the Curator's responsibilities, namely Law no. 37/2004 as well as accountability mechanisms if negligence or errors occur in the bankruptcy process. The research results show that the Curator can be held accountable both legally and personally if his negligence or error results in losses for creditors, with a reporting mechanism to the supervising judge as the first step. These findings highlight the importance of the Curator's integrity and professionalism to ensure fair and effective bankruptcy implementation, as well as protecting creditor rights from potential losses
Co-Authors Diamita Syndo, Sivana Amanda Maziyyah, Rifdatul Nizar Rahmatullah Ramadhan, Muhammad Galuh Pamungkas Wahyu Reni Andreyani Ryszhard Ken Sakti Safaruddin Harefa Salsabila, Natasya Vernanda Putri Shohihah, Millatus Sri Warjiyati Syatta, Indy Mafiiqo Syndo, Sivana Amanda Diamita Watae, Suleman Yusya Rugaya Salsabilah