Elsa Aprina
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Balikpapan, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Pemanfaatan Acces Right Oleh Pihak Asing Di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Hafiuddin, Ahmad; Presilia, Melany; Aprina, Elsa
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2024): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v18i1.4755

Abstract

This study aims to review the access right provisions that can be utilized by oreign fishing vessels in the territory of Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone. Given that the provisions of UNCLOS 1982 provide an opportunity for other countries, especially for landlocked states and geographically disadvantaged states to take advantage of the Exclusive Economic Zone belonging to the coastal state. The research method used in writing this article is normative juridical. Based on the results of the study, the use of access right by foreign fishing vessels can be carried out based on konvention and must comply with national regulations of the Government of Indonesia, namely through Fisheries Act. Access rights can only be used by foreign parties if the coastal state has complied with the provisions stipulated in the convention and takes into account its national interest in food needs in the field of fisheries. So that the obligation of the coastal state in opening the access right as stated in the convention cannot necessarily be carried out if the Indonesian state government has not been optimal in implementing international and national regulations.
KEABSAHAN ALASAN PENOLAKAN REPUBLIK RAKYAT TIONGKOK TERHADAP PUTUSAN PERMANENT COURT ARBITRATION ATAS SENGKETA KLAIM WILAYAH LAUT CINA SELATAN ANTARA PHILIPINA DAN REPUBLIK RAKYAT TIONGKOK BERDASARKAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Fatmawati, Ana; Aprina, Elsa
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v5i1.3289

Abstract

This articles shall discuss the arguments made by the People’s Republic of China in rejecting the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s decision made under the UNCLOS 1982 and which should be regarded as final and binding.  The main question is whether the arguments put forward are valid according to international public law, especially in light of the UNCLOS and the general principles of international law regulating dispute settlements and territorial claims.  A legal audit, a juridical dogmatic approach, shall be utilized here. The author concludes that not one rule or principles of international law seems to support the arguments made by the PRC in rejecting the validity of the Arbitration’s decision.
Eskalasi Gelombang Pengungsi Rohingya Di Indonesia: Praktik Penanganan Serta Implikasinya Aprina, Elsa; Angraini, Ana Fatmawati; Lestari, sari; Raihanataya, Radhiyyah
Jurnal de Facto Vol 11 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Balikpapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Isu mengenai Pengungsi Rohingya yang datang ke wilayah negara Indonesia kembali marak, hal tersebut dikarenakan adanya eskalasi gelombang pengungsi yang masuk ke Indonesia yang hingga kini telah mencapai sebesar 1.478 orang. Mereka datang dan menyebar ke bebarapa daerah di Indonesia. Kedatangan mereka yaitu bertujuan untuk memperoleh perlindungan, mendapatkan tempat tinggal dan makanan. Semakin meningkatknya eskalasi pengungsi di Indonesia tentu harus mendapatkan perhatian terutama hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan penanganan para pengungsi. Meskipun pemerintah Indonesia sebenarnya sampai saat ini belum meratifikasi Refugees Convention 1951 dan Protocol 1967, namun para pengungsi tetap diberikan tempat penampungan sementara sebagai bentuk bantuan dan menjunjung tinggi prinsip kemanusiaan dan kepedulian pemerintah Indonesia. Pada artikel ini akan memberikan gambaran mengenai penanganan yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah terhadap para pengungsi etnis Rohinya dan implikasi dari adanya eskalasi gelombang pengungsi tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni pendekatan yuridis normatif yang perolehan datanya sebagian besar menggunakan studi kepustakaan yang komprehensif.
Pemanfaatan Acces Right Oleh Pihak Asing Di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Hafiuddin, Ahmad; Presilia, Melany; Aprina, Elsa
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2024): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v18i1.4755

Abstract

This study aims to review the access right provisions that can be utilized by oreign fishing vessels in the territory of Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone. Given that the provisions of UNCLOS 1982 provide an opportunity for other countries, especially for landlocked states and geographically disadvantaged states to take advantage of the Exclusive Economic Zone belonging to the coastal state. The research method used in writing this article is normative juridical. Based on the results of the study, the use of access right by foreign fishing vessels can be carried out based on konvention and must comply with national regulations of the Government of Indonesia, namely through Fisheries Act. Access rights can only be used by foreign parties if the coastal state has complied with the provisions stipulated in the convention and takes into account its national interest in food needs in the field of fisheries. So that the obligation of the coastal state in opening the access right as stated in the convention cannot necessarily be carried out if the Indonesian state government has not been optimal in implementing international and national regulations.
KEABSAHAN ALASAN PENOLAKAN REPUBLIK RAKYAT TIONGKOK TERHADAP PUTUSAN PERMANENT COURT ARBITRATION ATAS SENGKETA KLAIM WILAYAH LAUT CINA SELATAN ANTARA PHILIPINA DAN REPUBLIK RAKYAT TIONGKOK BERDASARKAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Fatmawati, Ana; Aprina, Elsa
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v5i1.3289

Abstract

This articles shall discuss the arguments made by the People’s Republic of China in rejecting the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s decision made under the UNCLOS 1982 and which should be regarded as final and binding.  The main question is whether the arguments put forward are valid according to international public law, especially in light of the UNCLOS and the general principles of international law regulating dispute settlements and territorial claims.  A legal audit, a juridical dogmatic approach, shall be utilized here. The author concludes that not one rule or principles of international law seems to support the arguments made by the PRC in rejecting the validity of the Arbitration’s decision.