Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : PESHUM

Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Whistleblower Narkotika Berbasis Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Dirwansyah, Dirwansyah; Muhamad Harun; K.A. Bukhori
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16008

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal protection for whistleblowers in narcotics criminal cases in Indonesia through the perspective of Islamic Constitutional Law (Siyāsah Shar‘iyyah) and the theory of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. As an extraordinary crime, narcotics require active public participation, yet whistleblowers often face significant legal and physical risks. This normative legal research uses a statutory and conceptual approach to evaluate Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, Law No. 31 of 2014 on Witness and Victim Protection, and the 1945 Constitution. The results indicate a normative vacuum and regulatory fragmentation that fail to provide absolute immunity for whistleblowers. From an Islamic perspective, protecting whistleblowers is a constitutional-theological obligation to safeguard the five essential elements (al-darūriyyāt al-khamsah), particularly hifẓ al-nafs (protection of life) and hifẓ al-‘aql (protection of intellect). This study proposes a legal reconstruction that integrates constitutional principles with maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah to ensure comprehensive protection and legal certainty for those reporting narcotics crimes.
Analisis Yuridis Temuan Insidental dalam Praktik Penyadapan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Ade Rachmad Hidayat; Arne Huzaimah; K.A. Bukhori
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16009

Abstract

This study examines the normative construction of the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission's (KPK) wiretapping authority, specifically concerning "wiretapping beyond the main case" or incidental findings. The analysis focuses on the tension between KPK's extraordinary powers in combating corruption and the constitutionally guaranteed right to privacy. Using a normative legal research approach, this study evaluates the conformity of extended wiretapping practices with human rights limitation principles, including legality, necessity, proportionality, and due process of law. Findings reveal normative ambiguity in existing regulations, which could lead to broad discretion and potential violations of constitutional rights. The research proposes an ideal formulation for wiretapping authority limits, emphasizing strict subject and object restrictions, judicial authorization, time limitations, and independent oversight. This framework aims to achieve a balance between effective corruption eradication and the protection of human rights within a democratic rule of law.
Beyond Equality Before the Law: Konstruksi Perlindungan Hak Perempuan dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Bella Ayu Aranta; Muhammad Adil; K.A. Bukhori
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.15634

Abstract

Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, whose validity was later reaffirmed through Law No. 6 of 2023, has brought about a fundamental shift in labor law regulations in Indonesia. This legislation was designed within a deregulation policy framework with an emphasis on increasing labor market flexibility as an instrument to strengthen the investment climate and stimulate national economic growth. However, this policy direction raises normative issues, particularly regarding the certainty of protecting the rights of women workers, who are structurally vulnerable in employment relations. Within the framework of human rights, as affirmed in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, legal protection cannot be understood solely as equal treatment before the law. Furthermore, legal protection necessitates the application of substantive justice that takes into account the differences in social, biological, and economic conditions inherent in vulnerable groups. Departing from this perspective, this research aims to examine the normative construction of women's rights protection in the Job Creation Law by positioning the human rights regime as the analytical framework and assessing the extent to which the regulation accommodates the principle of substantive justice in protecting women workers. This study employs normative legal research methods with a statutory and conceptual approach, complemented by a review of the Constitutional Court's ruling on the Job Creation Law. The research findings indicate that the provisions for protecting women's rights in the Job Creation Law still rely on a formal equality approach that tends to be gender-neutral. This approach fails to fully address the specific protection needs based on gender vulnerabilities, resulting in the suboptimal fulfillment of women workers' human rights within the national labor law system.