Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penyuluhan AGRITEXTS: Journal of Agricultural Extension Jurnal Triton Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Sapja Anantanyu
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : AGRITEXTS: Journal of Agricultural Extension

 1 
KOMPETENSI PENYULUH DALAM MENDUKUNG GERAKAN PEMBERDAYAAN PETANI TERPADU (GPPT) DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Yuliani Yuliani; Sapja Anantanyu; Agung Wibowo
AGRITEXTS: Journal of Agricultural Extension Vol 41, No 2 (2017): October
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1275.036 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/agritexts.v41i2.18562

Abstract

This study aims to examine the EmpowermentMovement of Integrated Farmers; the extension agents’ competence related with EmpowermentMovement of Integrated Farmers; the factors that affecting the competence of extension agents, to examine the effect of factors that affecting the competence of extension agents with extension agents’ competence. The location of the study was determined purposively because of the presence of EMIF, where the focus of this movement is the empowerment of farmer groups while there are still many farmer groups that are in the beginner class. The population of this research is the extension agents whose working area is in the same sub district with farmers group on the beginner class. The sampling method was done with total sampling is32 people. Data analysis using multiple linear regressions. The extension agents’ competence in compiling the program is low; The extension agents’ competence in preparing the materials, establishing media, agribusiness consulting services, evaluating the implementation of extension, evaluating the impact of extension, conducting the assessment is moderate; The extension agents’ competence in the application of the method is high; (3) Factors that affecting the extension agents’ competence the ability to mobilizing the group (X1); personality (X2); The attitude of extension agents’ (X3); The extension agents’counseling skills (X4); motivation(X6) are moderate; The extension agents’ experience (X5) is very low. (4) There is a significant influence between the counseling skills and the motivation with the extension agents’ competence and there is no significant influence between the ability to mobilizing the group, personality, attitude of extension agents’ and experience with extension agents’ competence.
OPTIMALISASI TUGAS POKOK DAN FUNGSI PENYULUH DALAM KERANGKA PELAKSANAAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2006 Khadijah Khairunnisa; Sapja Anantanyu; Arip Wijianto
AGRITEXTS: Journal of Agricultural Extension Vol 41, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1749.158 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/agritexts.v41i1.18072

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the aspects of the performance of the main tasks and extension functions on institutions that have implemented and have not implemented Law number 16 of 2006. The basic method used in the research is qualitative descriptive by case study method. The location of research is the Executing Agency of Sragen Regency that already implemented Law Number 16 of 2006 and the Agricultural Service of Klaten Regency that haven’t implemented Law Number 16 of 2006. Data were obtained by interview guidance on 14 informants through observation, interview and documentation. The data analysis used is interactive analysis that consist of data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing. The data is validated with source triangulation and method triangulation. The results showed that the implementation of the main tasks and functions of extension on institutions that have implemented and have not implemented Law no. 16 of 2006 is the same, ie from the preparation process extension until the evaluation and reporting process. There is no difference in the two institutions in performing their main duties and functions.
Co-Authors Ade Saputra Nasution Argyo Demartoto Arip Wijianto Aris Sudiyanto Eksa Rusdiyana Eny Lestari Festy Mahanani Mulyaningrum Fetria Andriani Galuh Anggani Khadijah Khairunnisa Margono Slamet Moerindra Sekar Arum Pratiwi Prabowo Tjitropranoto Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sumardjo Yuliani Yuliani