Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.311
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSS (Jurnal Sosial Soedirman) Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Civil Service : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Journal of Social And Economics Research Public Policy and Management Inquiry Journal of Innovative and Creativity journal of social and economic research
Ali Rokhman
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Etika Wakil Rakyat dan Respon Publik terhadap Kebijakan Kontroversial: Refleksi atas Demonstrasi Agustus 2025 Rhomadani Sinta Pratiwi; Ali Rokhman
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.4111

Abstract

This study discusses the ethical practices of legislators and public responses to a controversial policy regarding the increase of housing allowances for members of the DPR, which triggered large scale demonstrations in August 2025. The policy was perceived by the public as inconsistent with the government’s mission of budget efficiency, leading to a wave of distrust. The purpose of this research is to analyze the ethical practices of legislators in policymaking, to examine public responses to the policy, to explore its implications for the quality of the relationship between citizens and their representatives, and to formulate strategies for improving the political ethics of legislators to ensure more transparent and accountable legislative processes. The research employed a descriptive qualitative method by analyzing literature, official documents, media reports, and digital data from social media. The data were critically analyzed to illustrate the dynamics of the relationship between legislators’ ethics and public responses to DPR’s controversial policies. The findings show that DPR’s ethical practices were primarily oriented toward internal organizational interests, while neglecting public sensitivities to socio-economic conditions. This led to public responses that escalated from peaceful criticism to anarchic demonstrations, accompanied by the “17+8 points” demands. Digital activism and the role of influencers further amplified public pressure, making this issue highly visible in the public sphere. The study concludes that the August 2025 demonstrations reflect a crisis of political ethics and the legitimacy of legislators. This crisis can only be addressed through ethical reforms that place citizens at the center of representation. Without serious reform, DPR risks further losing its social legitimacy.
Co-Authors Ahmad Nur Kholis Aji Machmud, Fikri Eka Bahrudin Bahrudin Bakhrur Rokhman Denok Kurniasih Dimas Bayu Setiawan Eko Sumanto Luhjingga Panasari Urbaningrum Marfuah, Sri Rotul Ma’rup, Muhammad Muslih Faozanudin NOVITASARI Nuki Lestari Wahyuningtyas Pramita Sukarso Rhomadani Sinta Pratiwi Setyawan Adhi Nugroho Slamet Rosyadi Sukarso Sukarso Tobirin Tobirin Wahyuningrat Wahyuningrat Yonatan Adam