Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.036
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ) Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pijar MIPA Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF) JIFP (Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya) Journal of Mathematics Science and Computer Education
Nely Andriani
Universitas Sriwijaya
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JIFP (Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya)

 1 
KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL TOULMIN PADA MATERI HUKUM NEWTON DI SMP NEGERI 57 PALEMBANG Nely Andriani; Lucy Triananda; Supardi Supardi; Saparini Saparini; Evelina Astra Patriot
Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP) Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP)
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/jifp.v7i2.18355

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the argumentation abilities of students in class VIII-1 in the odd semester of the 2022/2023 academic year at SMP Negeri 57 Palembang in the material of style and motion using the Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern (TAP) model. The Toulmin argumentation model is an instrument used to process arguments presented by students which consists of 6 indicators namely Claim, Data, Warrant, Backing, Qualifier, and Rebuttal. The method used in this research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The data collection technique was carried out in two stages, namely tests in the form of description questions and non-tests in the form of interviews with subject teachers. The results of the test research show that the level of students' argumentation abilities is low, where they are only at level 1 with a percentage of 58.10%, level 2 with a percentage of 30.95%, and level 3 with a percentage of 10.95% but no one is at level 4 yet and level 5. These results indicate that argumentation skills are still in the low category. The research results obtained that students have not been able to connect between material and concepts correctly. Then, learning activities carried out for some time were constrained by adjustments to the end of PPKM which had lasted for 3 years. Students are still adapting to the learning process that has begun to be carried out face-to-face. A teacher expected to be able to immediately provide the right learning process with the existing conditions
Co-Authors Abidin Pasaribu Andri yanto Anggia Novaliza Benni Benni Dinna Fitria Evelina Astra Patriot Fuad Abd. Rachman Gerry Sugiarto Hamdi Akhsan Henny Lestari Ismet Ismet Ketang Wiyono Ketang Wiyono Lucy Triananda Melly Ariska Muhamad Yusup Muhammad Muslim Murniati . Nur Julia Ningsih Octaria Nuriska Putri Aliana Yhawita Sari Saparini Saparini Sudirman, Sudirman Supardi Supardi Syuhendri, Syuhendri Wayan Sinta Purnama Sari Widya Rahmatika Rizaldi Widya Rahmatika Rizaldi Yeyen Yelensi Yuli Setianingsih Zulherman Zulherman