Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.728
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Konstitusi Justitia et Pax Widya Yuridika JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Magistrorum et Scholarium: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Umbu Rauta
Christian University Of Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum

 1 
Kewenangan Inheren Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Perkara Pengaduan Konstitutional dengan Objek Putusan Pengadilan Aruan, Bagas Christofel; Rauta, Umbu
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): January-June 2022
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v2i1.27828

Abstract

The authority of the Constitutional Court is often limited only to the judicial review of statutory products, not practice. The method used for this research is normative legal research using a conceptual approach, legislation, and comparisons. This legal research aims to examine the implementation of constitutional complaint schemes in various countries while reviewing the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court in reviewing constitutional complaint cases with the object of court decisions. The results show that the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea has many similarities with the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia; at the same time, the German Constitutional Court gives rights to individuals, communions, and associations to file a constitutional complaint and the United States Supreme Court establishes several criteria for legal standing for parties who make constitutional complaints. Then, the Constitutional Court has the authority to decide on constitutional objections, including court decisions, considering the court's decision is analogous to the law itself. Furthermore, based on constitutionalism, the constitutional complaint is the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court. KEYWORDS: Constitutional Court, Constitutional Complaint, Court Rulings, Inherent Power.
Co-Authors Alfret Ari Siswanto Arie Siswanto, Arie Aruan, Bagas Christofel Dyah Hapsari Prananingrum Freidelino P. R. A. de Sousa Indirani Wauran, Indirani Kishan, Marcelino Ceasar Krisyando Kelmaskosu Maheswara, Giovanni Battista Margaretha, Lagasakti Parwati Ninon Melatyugra Setyorini, Heny Sri Agung Baskoro Theofransus Litaay Titon Slamet Kurnia Yafet Y.W. Rissy