Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Implikasi Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Pasal 2 KUHP terhadap Asas Legalitas dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Yanuardi Yogaswara; Tata Surwita; Dewi Asri Yustia
El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/elmujtama.v4i3.2191

This research discusses customary criminal law in Article 2 of Indonesia's new Criminal Code (KUHP), which reflects the country's social and cultural diversity. Customary criminal law, with its unique characteristics rooted in the values and social norms of indigenous communities, offers a different approach to conflict resolution compared to formal criminal law. It enriches the criminal justice system with aspects of restorative justice and creates space for the recognition of living law within society. However, this integration poses challenges, particularly regarding legal certainty and the principle of legality, considering that customary criminal law is often unwritten and variable. The method used is normative, involving legal research conducted through the study of literature or secondary data. The research is descriptive-analytical, focusing on the existence of customary law within national criminal law. Using a qualitative juridical approach, the analysis is based on legal principles and norms, studying legislation, literature, and scholarly writings. This study shows that the recognition of customary criminal law in Article 2 of the new Criminal Code presents challenges and opportunities for Indonesia's criminal justice system. This integration supports restorative justice and reflects the country's cultural diversity, but it also requires careful handling of legal certainty and the principle of legality. The need for clear conflict resolution mechanisms and additional regulations is crucial to maintaining a balance between customary legal traditions and the requirements of modern criminal law.

Plurarisme Sanksi Pidana antara Blue Collar Crime dan White Collar Crime dalam Prespektif Keadilan Pranata, Elda; Yustia, Dewi Asri
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1977

This study examines the pluralism of criminal sanctions between blue-collar crime and white-collar crime from a justice perspective, focusing on the disparities in law enforcement in Indonesia. Blue-collar crimes, typically committed by individuals from lower socioeconomic classes, such as theft or violence, often receive harsh penalties like imprisonment. In contrast, white-collar crimes, perpetrated by individuals of higher socioeconomic status, such as corruption or embezzlement, tend to receive lighter sanctions, such as fines or probation. This disparity raises questions about substantive justice and the principle of equality before the law. Employing a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes relevant legislation, including the 1945 Constitution, the Criminal Code, and Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights, alongside case studies such as the Nenek Asyani case, the Bank Century scandal, and the HM tin corruption case. The findings reveal that law enforcement for blue-collar crimes is often swift and retributive, while white-collar crimes are frequently hindered by power dynamics, political connections, and legal impunity, undermining deterrence and social justice. Grounded in Pancasila’s justice theory and punishment theories (absolute, relative, and combined), this study highlights the need for balanced sentencing reforms, prioritizing restorative justice for blue-collar crimes and proportional sanctions for white-collar crimes. It recommends strengthening the independence of law enforcement, implementing mediation for minor cases, and adjusting criminal policies to ensure fair punishment proportional to the crime’s impact. Thus, this study contributes to the discourse on inclusive and responsive criminal justice in addressing social dynamics.

PENTINGNYA PENDAMPINGAN HUKUM BAGI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL: KEBUTUHAN DAN KEHARUSAN HUKUM PIDANA Ridwan, Fihra Rizqi Novia; Yustia, Dewi Asri
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Mei-Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i2.9022

The number of cases of sexual violence that is currently occurring is getting higher and more extreme. It occurs due to the inability to handle the case. The researcher used a normative juridical research method with a qualitative juridical approach; namely, the obtained data was analyzed using a legal theory approach, legal principles, and a statutory approach. She conducted library research and field research. She conducted interviews with experienced victim advocates with a victim's perspective at the Legal Aid Institution of the Indonesian Women's Association for Justice Jakarta. She analyzed the problem of legal aid for victims of criminal acts of sexual violence using approaches to legal theory, legal principles, and statutory regulations. The legal materials used to analyze the issue were primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials through scientific journals, statutory regulations, and other relevant legal literature. The research results indicated that there are many serious obstacles and challenges faced by victims of sexual violence, such as law enforcement, lack of understanding by law enforcement officials regarding victims' rights, criminalisation of victims, and difficulties for victims in accessing support services. Therefore, assisting victims of sexual violence is very important to increase the understanding and awareness of law enforcement officials regarding victims' rights as well as providing adequate safe space for victims in dealing with their cases.

Kajian Hukum Terhadap Kasus Malpraktik Dokter Yang Melakukan Tindakan Medis Tanpa Persetujuan Pasien (Informed Consent) Putra, Liko Lazuardi; Yustia, Dewi Asri
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6474

Malpraktik kedokteran yang dilakukan tanpa memperoleh informed consent dari pasien merupakan bentuk pelanggaran terhadap hak-hak pasien dan menjadi permasalahan serius dalam praktik medis di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kualifikasi tindakan dokter yang dapat dikategorikan sebagai malpraktik, serta menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam kasus tindakan medis yang dilakukan tanpa persetujuan pasien. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, studi doktrin, dan analisis kasus konkret. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan medis yang dilakukan tanpa persetujuan pasien, kecuali dalam keadaan gawat darurat, merupakan pelanggaran terhadap prinsip otonomi pasien dan dapat menimbulkan pertanggungjawaban pidana berdasarkan Pasal 359 dan 360 KUHP. Selain itu, ketentuan dalam UU No. 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan secara tegas mengatur pentingnya persetujuan dalam tindakan medis sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pasien. Oleh karena itu, setiap dokter wajib menjalankan prosedur informed consent sebagai bagian dari standar profesi dan kode etik kedokteran, agar tidak berujung pada konsekuensi hukum pidana akibat kelalaian atau kesengajaan.

Kajian Hukum Terhadap Kasus Malpraktik Dokter Yang Melakukan Tindakan Medis Tanpa Persetujuan Pasien (Informed Consent) Liko Lazuardi Putra; Dewi Asri Yustia
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6474

Malpraktik kedokteran yang dilakukan tanpa memperoleh informed consent dari pasien merupakan bentuk pelanggaran terhadap hak-hak pasien dan menjadi permasalahan serius dalam praktik medis di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kualifikasi tindakan dokter yang dapat dikategorikan sebagai malpraktik, serta menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam kasus tindakan medis yang dilakukan tanpa persetujuan pasien. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, studi doktrin, dan analisis kasus konkret. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan medis yang dilakukan tanpa persetujuan pasien, kecuali dalam keadaan gawat darurat, merupakan pelanggaran terhadap prinsip otonomi pasien dan dapat menimbulkan pertanggungjawaban pidana berdasarkan Pasal 359 dan 360 KUHP. Selain itu, ketentuan dalam UU No. 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan secara tegas mengatur pentingnya persetujuan dalam tindakan medis sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pasien. Oleh karena itu, setiap dokter wajib menjalankan prosedur informed consent sebagai bagian dari standar profesi dan kode etik kedokteran, agar tidak berujung pada konsekuensi hukum pidana akibat kelalaian atau kesengajaan.

IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PIDANA KERJA SOSIAL BERBASIS NILAI-NILAI HUKUM ADAT SUNDA Yustia, Rd. Dewi Asri; Batubara, Gialdah Tapiansari; Ludiana, Tia
LITIGASI Vol. 22 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v22i2.4526

Criminal sanctions against perpetrators of corruption crimes require extraordinary breakthrough according to the penal objectives, which is not only to provide a deterrent effect for the perpetrators, but also to provide benefits to the community by optimizing the competencies held by the perpetrators, since perpetrators of corruption are competent either in the aspects of social, economics and politics. The current criminal sanctions do not lead to the utilization of the potential possessed by the perpetrators of criminal acts. The focus still leads to deter the perpetrators only by providing severe criminal sanctions, namely by accumulating criminal sanctions in prison and fines, as well as other additional sanctions that focus on perpetrators, not on to interests of the state and society. The result of the research is to conceive the concept of social work sanctions that utilize the competence/expertise of the perpetrators to be able to provide great benefits to the community directly which implementation is based on the values contained in Sundanese customary law, so that the objectives of the punishment are not only to correct the conduct of the perpetrators, but also to restore state financial losses, and to provide great benefits for the community. Keywords: Sanction of Community Service, values, Sundanese Customary Law, Purpose of Punishment.

Restorative Justice: Finding Common Ground Between Justice and Shared Interests Yustia, Dewi Asri; Jodi, Faris Fachrizal; Panjaitan, Ananda Chrisna D.; Hassan, Fareed Mohd
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 8 NO. 1 JANUARY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v1i1.32646

In Indonesia’s current criminal justice practice, the resolution of criminal acts can be pursued through two main approaches: retributive justice, as regulated by the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and restorative justice, which has gradually been adopted through various regulations at the stages of investigation, prosecution, and adjudication. Restorative justice emphasizes restoration rather than retribution by involving the offender, the victim, their respective families, and community figures in a collaborative process to reach a fair resolution. This study aims to examine the fundamental principles of restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system and to propose a conceptual framework that promotes an integrative approach to resolving criminal cases by balancing the interests of all parties. Using a normative juridical method and a qualitative approach, the study finds that restorative justice is based on the principles of restitution, reconciliation, and social reintegration. To support its effective implementation, the concept should include the strengthening of legal norms concerning victims’ rights, the authority of law enforcement institutions, and the development of a justice system that embraces restorative values. Ultimately, the application of restorative justice is expected to shape a criminal justice system that is not only repressive but also ensures a balanced consideration of the interests of victims, offenders, and society as a whole.

Victim Oriented Model for Resolving Traffic Accident Cases in Pursuit of Reforming Indonesia’s Criminal Law Policy Rini Widiyanti; Anthon F. Susanto; Rd. Hj. Dewi Asri Yustia
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Juni
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i4.610

Traffic accidents in Indonesia continue to cause significant human, social, and economic losses; however, their legal resolution remains predominantly retributive and insufficiently responsive to victims’ rights and recovery. This study aims to analyze the legal formulation for determining victims in traffic accident cases from a victimological perspective and to develop a victim-oriented settlement model as part of Indonesia’s criminal law policy reform. This research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical orientation using statute, conceptual, comparative, and supportive empirical approaches. The comparative analysis examines restorative and victim-oriented mechanisms in Japan, the Netherlands, and Singapore, while empirical input was obtained through semi-structured interviews with police officers, prosecutors, legal experts, and traffic accident victims as supportive qualitative material. The findings reveal three principal weaknesses in the current system: the marginalization of victims within criminal proceedings, the absence of standardized criteria for determining victim status, and the weak implementation of compensation or restitution mechanisms. The study further found that restorative and victim-oriented approaches can be integrated into formal criminal justice without eliminating offender accountability. In response, this article proposes a victim-oriented model consisting of four core elements: victim determination based on victimology, structured mediation facilitated by law enforcement, accessible and enforceable restitution mechanisms, and active victim participation throughout the settlement process. This study is limited by its primarily doctrinal character and supportive empirical scope. The originality of this study lies in integrating victimology-based victim determination with a structured restorative justice framework specifically designed for traffic accident cases in Indonesia.

Operationalizing Living Law to Ensure Fair Trial and Prevent Abuse of Power in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Hana Krisnamurti; Dewi Asri Yustia; Sri Mulyati Chalil
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.889-901

This study analyzes the role of living law in realizing the principle of fair trial within the Indonesian criminal justice system following its formal recognition in the Indonesia’s 2023 Criminal Code. It aims to examine how living law can be operationalized as a legal instrument to bridge the gap between formal legality and substantive justice, while preventing abuse of power across criminal proceedings. Despite its normative acknowledgment, the implementation of living law remains inconsistent and often constrained by a positivistic legal approach, resulting in disparities and legal uncertainty in judicial practice. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by an analytical-descriptive design based on secondary legal materials, including legislation, jurisprudence, and legal doctrines. The findings demonstrate that living law contributes significantly to the realization of fair trial principles by incorporating societal values, ensuring proportionality in sentencing, recognizing customary sanctions, and preventing double punishment (ne bis in idem). However, the absence of standardized criteria, formal validation mechanisms, and procedural guidelines creates risks of subjectivity and arbitrariness. The novelty of this study lies in positioning living law as an operational and structured legal mechanism within criminal justice, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework integrated with human rights safeguards to ensure legal certainty, consistency, and substantive justice.

The Legal Validity of Information Technology Utilization by Judges in Supervising the Execution of Criminal Sentences Rd. Dewi Asri Yustia; Faris Fachrizal Jodi
Yustisia Vol 14, No 3: December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v14i3.101459

The oversight and monitoring of the implementation of criminal sentences represent a vital yet inadequately developed aspect of Indonesia’s criminal justice system, especially in achieving sentencing goals such as rehabilitation, deterrence, and social reintegration. This article is urgent because criminal penalties are getting more complicated, judges have too much work to do, and information and communication technology (ICT) is moving too quickly for the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) to keep up. The study aims to examine the legal obstacles encountered by courts in the oversight of criminal offenders via ICT and to develop a suitable legislative framework that confers binding legal authority to such technology. Utilizing a normative juridical methodology encompassing statutory, conceptual, philosophical, and comparative frameworks, this study examines Indonesian criminal procedural law in conjunction with comparative practices from several jurisdictions. The findings indicate substantial normative deficiencies in KUHAP regarding the utilization of ICT for judicial oversight and monitoring, leading to the constrained efficacy of post-sentencing supervision. The study suggests the explicit integration of ICT-based supervision standards into KUHAP to enhance judicial oversight of sentence implementation. The study enhances the evolution of criminal law by promoting discourse on criminal law policy, especially in reconciling procedural law reform with technological advancements and the changing aims of punishment.

Title

Found 22 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 22 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 22 Documents
Search