Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Lex Lata: Jurnal Ilmah Ilmu Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Annalisa Yahanan
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Model Of Agreement Executing Fiduciary Collateral Objects With Underhand Selling Sri Turatmiyah; Annalisa Yahanan; Sri Handayani
Simbur Cahaya Volume 30 Nomor 1, Juni 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v30i1.2727

Abstract

Fiduciary Collateral gives priority to fiduciary recipient creditors. If the debtor defaults, then, complying with the provisions of Article 29 paragraph 1, sub-paragraph c, Law Number 42/1999 concerning Fiduciary Collateral, creditor may directly executes fiduciary objects with underhand  selling based on the agreement of the parties. This selling is implemented after the debtor is declared default in 1 (one) month after the written statement of the creditor to the debtor announced in at least 2 (two) newspapers in the relevant area. Execution of objects with underhand  selling based on  an agreement between the creditor and the debtor has not been clearly regulated in this law. Therefore, the model of agreement must be included at time on which the fiduciary agreement is made. Based on this background, it is necessary to conduct research with objective to obtain a agreement model of debtor and creditor in underhand selling of fiduciary collateral object if the debtor defaults. This study is normative research prioritizing secondary legal materials analyzed descriptively qualitatively. Creditor receiving Fiduciary Collateral is preferred and prioritized creditor because the creditor has rights to sell fiduciary objects with personal power. It is regulated in Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 42/1999 suggesting that that creditor has power to sell fiduciary collateral object on his/her own personal power.
Strengthening Alternative Law for Business Dispute Resolution between StateOwned Enterprises and Peace-Oriented Private Enterprises (Benefit-Benefit Solution) Bambang Hariyanto; Annalisa Yahanan; Muhammad Syaifuddin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6983

Abstract

The settlement of business disputes in the current State- Owned Enterprises Law accommodates Alternative Dispute Resolution through consensus. However, the ADR regulation only governs disputes between state- owned enterprises and private enterprises. In fact, ADR as a nonlitigation instrument is very suitable and popularly used by business companies at the global and national levels with the principle of beneficial solutions. The absence of ADR provisions for dispute resolution between SOEs and private companies is an issue that has been raised with the following objectives: 1. To analyse the applicable legal provisions on alternative dispute resolution in handling business disputes between SOEs and private companies; 2. Strengthenalternative dispute resolution laws in resolving business disputes between SOEs and private companies with a focus on mutual benefit for the disputing parties (benefit-benefit solution). The results of the study show that: 1. APS regulations are found in different laws and regulations governing various business sectors, but they are not fully and specifically regulated in the State-Owned Enterprise Law, Limited Liability Company Law, Arbitration Law, and the APS itself. 2. Legal reinforcement is needed to regulate ADR in the SOE Law, the PT Law and the establishment of a special ADR Law in order to create peace-oriented ADR that is beneficial to disputing SOEs and BUMS.
PROBLEMATIKA WASIAT WAJIBAH DALAM HUKUM KEWARISAN DI INDONESIA Pasyah, Taroman; Annalisa Yahanan; Siti Mariam Binti Mohamad Zin
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Repertorium: November 2025
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v14i2.5145

Abstract

Abstrak: Tujuan dilakukan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kedudukan anak angkat dan orang tua angkat dalam hukum kewarisan yang mendapat harta waris melalui mekanisme wasiat wajibah di Indonesia. Selain itu juga mengetahui problematika ahli waris non-muslim dalam kedudukannya sebagai ahli waris yang mendapatkan harta waris melalui wasiat wajibah. Penelitian ini di laksanakan dengan mengumpulkan data sekunder melalui studi dokumen yang berupa bahan-bahan hukum yang relevan dengan permasalahan penelitian. Selanjutnya dilakukan analisis secara kualitatif terhadap data tersebut. Dari hasil penelitian dapat dijelaskan bahwa hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa anak angkat dan orang tua angkat memang bukan merupakan ahli waris yang berhak mendapatkan warisan dari pewaris yang telah meninggal dunia. Bahkan dalam konteks hukum syariat Islam tidak dikenal anak angkat dan orangtua angkat saling mewarisi. Akan tetapi keberadaan anak angkat dan orang tua angkat memiliki kedekatan emosional. Sehingga ke khawatirkan akan kesejahteraan anak angkat tersebut menjadi persoalan bagi orang tua angkat, maka sebagai solusi untuk menjembatani persoalan itu ditetapkan lah anak angkat dan orangtua angkat mendapat harta waris melalui mekanisme wasiat wajibah. Sebagaimana yang ditetapkan dalam Pasal 209 Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Berbeda dengan anak angkat dan orangtua angkat, yang penetapan wasiat wajibanya di tetapkan dalam KHI. Sementara ahli waris non-muslim yang mendapat bagian harta waris melalui mekanisme wasiat wajibah, berdasarkan yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung atau ijtihad para hakim yang berlandaskan keadilan dan untuk kemaslahatan hidup. Kata Kunci: Wasiat Wajibah; Anak Angkat; Non-Muslim; Ahli Waris; Mahkamah Agung
Co-Authors Agus Trisaka Bambang Hariyanto Deddy Deddy Dwi Merlyani Febrian Febrian Fitria Amini Iza Rumesten Kamal Halili Hassan Marlina Widiyanti, Marlina Muhammad Syaifuddin Ricky Dwiyandi Siti Mariam Binti Mohamad Zin Sri Handayani Sri Turatmiyah Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Taroman Pasyah Yahya Agung Putra Yochi Ayunita Yusuf Nursaid