Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.619
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MATAPPA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Abadimas Adi Buana SIGMA JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika) Musamus Journal of Mathematics Education Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika J-PiMat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Sibermas (Sinergi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) JUPIKA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Bima Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Rengganis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Edumatika Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang
Denok Julianingsih
STKIP BINA INSAN MANDIRI
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika

 1 
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR Muhammad Fuad Hidayatulloh; Denok Julianingsih
Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55719/jrpm.v3i2.290

Abstract

The ability to think creatively is a person's ability to process and think of new solutions in the form of ideas or real results. In processing new ideas, a person has different ways according to his learning style. Analysis of creative thinking skills aimed to describe students' creative thinking skills concerned of student learning styles. The method of this study used qualitative. The subject of this research was VIII-A SMP NU Bahrul Ulum, Menganti, Gresik 2020-2021 academic year. There are three instruments such as learning style questionnaire, creative thinking ability test and interview guidelines. Learning style questionnaires were given to all students in grades VIII-A, at the same time creative thinking tests and interviews were only given to three students representing each learning style. The measurement of creative thinking skills uses three indicators, there are fluency indicators, flexibility indicators, and novelty indicators. There are five levels in creative thinking ability level, that is level 4 it said very creative, level 3 is creative, level 2 said to quite creative, level 1 it said less creative and level 0 stated uncreative. Based on the results of the study, the researcher concluded that subjects with visual learning styles reached level 2 which was quite creative, subjects with auditory learning styles accomplished level 3 which is creative, and subjects with kinesthetic learning styles attained level 4 which was very creative. Therefore, each learning style has a different level of creative thinking.
PERBANDINGAN PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PBL (PROBLEM BASED LEARNING) DAN PJBL (PROJECT BASED LEARNING) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI TRIGONOMETRI Ika Nopiani; Denok Julianingsih
Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55719/jrpm.v5i1.555

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out (1) the effect of problem based learning on student learning outcomes in trigonometry material (2) the effect of project based learning learning on student learning outcomes in trigonometry material (3) the effect of problem based learning and project based learning on results student learning on trigonometry material. This study uses a semi-experimental method. The population in this study were all students of class X-IPA SMA Wachid Hasyim 5 Surabaya. The sample in this study used 2 classes, namely from X-IPA1 and X-IPA2. Class X-IPA1 when learning uses problem based learning while class X-IPA2 uses project based learning. The sampling technique in this study used purposive sampling. The research design used was a non-equivalent control group design and the data analysis technique used was the paired sample t-test and the independent sample t-test. Based on the results of the research data obtained, namely: (1) there is a significant effect on the use of problem based learning on student learning outcomes in trigonometry material (2) there is a significant effect in the use of project based learning on student learning outcomes in trigonometry material (3) no there is a significant influence between problem based learning and project based learning on student learning outcomes in trignometry material.
Co-Authors Ainur Rohmatun Nida Anggiatama Arif Romadhon Aprilia Dharmayanti Endang Krisnawati Endang Krisnawati Evi Rizqi Salamah Evi Widayanti Evi Widayanti Ika Nopiani Ika Nur Jayanti Indaria Tri Hariyani Indri Dwi Isnaini Indri Dwi Isnaini Mira Pradipta Ariyanti Mira Pradipta Aryanti Muhammad Fuad Hidayatulloh Nabila Irsalina Norma Diana Fitri Subaidah Subaidah