Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Sistem Penegakkan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembakaran Hutan di Sumatera Selatan Hasanal Mulkan; Serlika Aprita
Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 22, No 3 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2425

Abstract

Law enforcement carried out by law enforcement officers in the criminal justice system is one of the efforts that can protect the public from various forms of criminal acts that violate the provisions of the regulations that have been made. In relation to law enforcement against perpetrators of clearing plantation land using the burning method, which often occurs in Indonesia, especially in the province of South Sumatra, the police have a very important role in enforcing the law so as to create fair law enforcement. Based on these reasons, law enforcement should indeed be on the perpetrators of clearing individual plantation lands that result in forest fires. Forests are natural resources that occupy a very strategic position because they contain abundant natural resources. Forest damage that causes the most severe impact is forest fires. In South Sumatra, every year forest fires are frequent. Law enforcement of the crime of forest burning is needed to reduce the occurrence of forest fires caused by human activities. to find out about law enforcement against the crime of forest burning that occurred in South Sumatra and the obstacles in law enforcement against the crime of forest burning in South Sumatra. The research specification used in this research is descriptive analytical, which describes all the symptoms and facts and analyzes the current problems related to law enforcement against the crime of forest burning. Law enforcement against the crime of forest burning in South Sumatra is running from the process of investigation, investigation, prosecution and court decisions has not been maximized. In enforcing the law against the crime of forest burning in South Sumatra, law enforcers encountered several obstacles, namely: the location of forest burning that was difficult to reach, the condition of peatlands that were easily burned, dry weather and strong winds that made fires grow and spread, and difficult to find evidence and witnesses.
PERTANGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KURATOR YANG MELAKUKAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN PRINSIP INDEPENDENSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 Hasanal Mulkan; Serlika Aprita
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 1 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kurator mempunyai prinsip independensi dan tidak memihak yang merupakan salah satu prinsip utama yang dikenal dalam berbagai ketentuan hukum internasional yang juga dikehendaki oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Selain itu, kurator bertanggung jawab terhadap kesalahan atau kelalaiannya dalam melaksanakan tugas pengurusan dan/atau pemberesan terhadap harta pailit. Rumitnya penyelesaian pemberesan harta pailit semakin bertambah dengan pencantuman pasal sanksi pidana dalam UU Kepailitan yang menyatakan apabila terbukti kurator tidak independen dapat dikenakan sanksi hukum baik pidana maupun perdata sesuai perundang-undangan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif preskriptif. Adanya ancaman untuk menjatuhkan sanksi pidana terhadap kurator dihubungkan dengan sikap tidak independennya kurator pada akhirnya menjadi persoalan baru, khususnya terkait dengan pertanggungjawaban pidana yaitu dalam hal menentukan tolok ukur kurator dikatakan tidak independen sehingga dapat dijatuhi sanksi pidana akibat melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh UU Kepailitan. Pertanggungjawaban pidana kurator yang tidak independen mengacu kepada terpenuhinya 3 (tiga) pilar dalam hukum pidana yaitu ada perbuatan pidana, adanya kesalahan yang berakibat pertanggung jawaban pidana dan berkaitan pidana atau pemidanaan dengan berdasarkan pada prinsip independensi, yaitu kurator dalam situasi yang sulit dapat mengambil tindakan tegas demi kepentingan harta pailit. Adapun ratio decindendi hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap kurator tidak langsung mengacu kepada independensi kurator dalam Pasal 234 ayat (2) UU Kepailitan melainkan mengacu kepada KUHPidana.
PARADIGM OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF HOUSEHOLD MEDICAL WASTE IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: EXPECTATIONS AND CHALLENGES Serlika Aprita; Hasanal Mulkan
Awang Long Law Review Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i2.769

Abstract

The Covid-19 outbreak has had an impact on various sectors of life, including the environment. Medical waste in the community has increased in the new normal era of the Covid-19 pandemic, this can be seen from the existence of new adaptations in society, but in its application, household medical waste management is still an obstacle to this day. The approach method used is juridical-normative, with the type of dogmatic research, a form of perscriptive research on legal relations. The specification of this research is descriptive-analytical, the government continues to make various efforts in handling household medical waste. State responsibility as the basis for the implementation of environmental protection and management is carried out through the enforcement of environmental laws, namely administrative, civil and criminal law enforcement. Formulation of a new policy on the management of Infectious and Household Waste from Handling Covid 19.
ASSET RECOVERY DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA Hasanal Mulkan; Serlika Aprita
The Juris Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v7i1.870

Abstract

The positive law in force in Indonesia that regulates corruption is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. In overcoming the problem of corruption, in fact there are many difficulties faced by law enforcers which have become a routine part of law enforcement constraints in Indonesia. In addition, the problem is even more difficult if when the perpetrators of corruption are not in Indonesia, where trials are conducted in absentia, then the assets resulting from corruption have been hidden abroad, so this creates serious problems for prosecutors in carrying out executions. However, today the functionalization of criminal law in the context of enforcing the law on corruption, both from the point of view of material criminal law, formal criminal law (criminal procedure law), as well as criminal implementation, still faces obstacles, especially regarding the policy of recovering assets of perpetrators of corruption has implications for the implementation of the execution of replacement money payments in order to optimize the recovery of state financial losses. Thus, obstacles in eradicating criminal acts of corruption must be addressed immediately, so that they do not become an inhibiting factor in efforts to restore state financial losses, so that the national development program can run optimally. The current policy of recovering assets of perpetrators of corruption in an effort to recover state financial losses cannot be implemented optimally, because it must be recognized that current national law still has many weaknesses that create difficulties for law enforcers in recovering assets of perpetrators of corruption, especially in terms of confiscating the assets of the perpetrators of corruption, so that the return on state financial losses resulting from corruption is currently not optimal.
Perlindungan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Kosumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan Hasanal Mulkan; Veni Ardea Regita; Marissa Ikhsan; Fathya Faradilla; Muhammad Rizky Kurniawan
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2023): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v8i1.2379

Abstract

Disputes in the financial services sector can occur if there is a difference in understanding between the institution and the consumer regarding a service product from the related financial institution or from the institution's negligence in fulfilling its obligations. Consumer protection is all efforts to provide legal certainty to consumers. The PK Law is the legal basis for legal protection for consumers, while the OJK Law is the Constitution of the establishment of Financial Institutions, in this case the OJK as an independent body that regulates, supervises, inspects and investigates in the financial services sector as well as aims to protect consumers as users of financial services. In the applicable regulations, consumer protection is manifested in the obligations of financial services business actors related to complaint facilitation, complaint settlement facilities, internal control, consumer protection supervision, and sanctions. Settlement of disputes in the financial services sector first through the Financial Services Institution, if no settlement is reached, then proceed with settlement in court or out of court.