Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Optimalisasi AI pada Perancangan Rencana Pembelajaran Mendalam Guru Matematika SMK Husnul Khotimah; Besse Intan Permatasari
Jurnal Cahaya Edukasi Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Cahaya Edukasi
Publisher : Cahaya Smart Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63863/jce.v3i1.312

Abstract

Kualitas sumber daya manusia di Indonesia masih menghadapi tantangan pada kompetensi numerasi, terutama pada jenjang Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) di Penajam Paser Utara. Masalah utama yang dihadapi guru adalah rendahnya kemampuan dasar matematis siswa dan kesulitan dalam mengintegrasikan materi matematika dengan konteks kejuruan. Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kompetensi guru melalui workshop pembelajaran mendalam dan penyusunan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis proyek (PjBL) dengan bantuan Artificial Intelligence (AI). Metode yang digunakan meliputi ceramah, diskusi pemetaan masalah, dan kerja mandiri terstruktur dalam menyusun Rencana Pembelajaran Mendalam (RPM). Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan pemahaman guru dalam merancang proyek matematika yang relevan, seperti penggunaan trigonometri pada teknik geospasial. Meskipun terdapat kendala pada aspek kolaborasi antarguru dan keterbatasan waktu, peserta memberikan respon positif terhadap penggunaan AI dalam efisiensi administrasi pembelajaran. Kesimpulannya, workshop ini berhasil membekali guru dengan strategi pedagogis baru yang lebih mendalam dan fungsional untuk menyesuaikan dengan karakter siswa dan tuntutan kurikulum nasional.
Analisis Kognitif Siswa Berdasarkan Kerangka Formulate Employ Interpret pada Soal PISA Level 4 Husnul Khotimah; Mulianah Mulianah; Abdul Rahman; Bernard Bernard
Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Edisi Maret
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jm.v8i1.11101

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ difficulties in solving PISA Level 4 equivalent mathematical literacy tasks based on the Formulate, Employ, and Interpret (FEI) processes and to identify scaffolding implications at each stage. A descriptive design with quantitative and qualitative approaches was employed involving 28 ninth-grade junior high school students who worked on four PISA Level 4 equivalent tasks. Quantitative analysis was used to map students’ achievement profiles across the FEI processes, while qualitative analysis examined selected students’ written solution traces. The results indicate that students’ difficulties were most prominent at the formulate stage, as reflected in incomplete mathematical representations, although some students were able to carry out procedures (employ) and obtain correct final answers. Procedural errors and conceptual misconceptions persisted at the employ stage, whereas at the interpret stage students tended to stop at numerical results without adequately relating them to the problem context. These findings suggest that the FEI processes are interconnected and conceptually hierarchical, although they are not always explicitly articulated in students’ written responses, and provide a basis for future action-oriented research aimed at improving instruction and students’ performance in PISA assessments.