Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

KAIDAH "AL-ADAH MUHAKKAMAH" DALAM TRADISI PERNIKAHAN MASYARAKAT JAWA Haq, Husnul
Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (378.375 KB) | DOI: 10.21274/ahkam.2017.5.2.295-320

Abstract

Javanese people have many traditional ceremonies. Those ceremonies include the entire cycle of human lives; in the womb, birth, childhood, adolescence, marriage to death. One of the uniqueceremonies is the wedding ceremonies namely nontoni, lamaran, upacara tarub, and panggih. This research aims to describe kaeda of “Al-Adah Muhakkamah” and its application on the marriage traditions of Javanese society. The study begins by explaining the meaning of kaeda, and finally explaining its application on the marriage traditions of Javanese society. The approach used in this research is descriptive-qualitative approach, because this study is intended to reveal and describe the kaeda and its application on those traditions. By using research methods outlined above, it can be concluded that based on that kaeda, the marriage traditions of Javanese society are allowed in Islam, and even can be used as excuses to establish law with the condition: they have been running for a long time and have known to the general public, they are accepted by common sense as good traditions, and they are not contrary to the Quranic texts and Hadith of the Prophet.Keywords: Al-Adah Muhakkamah; Javanese society; Wedding Tradition.
Al-‘Alāmah al-Tijāriyyah wa Ḥimāyatuhā fī al-Qānūn al-Indūnīsī: Dirāsah Fiqhiyyah Taqwīmiyyah Haq, Husnul; Arif, Arif Ali
Al-Ahkam Volume 30, Nomor 2, Oktober 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (604.026 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2020.30.2.5293

Abstract

The trademark plays an important role in economic life, as it is a way for the merchant to distinguish his products from those produced by others. It also helps consumers to identify the products they want. Therefore, the countries of the world have agreed to conduct agreements to protect it, on top of which is the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). When the State of Indonesia agreed to sign this agreement, it had to provide legal cover in the field of the trademark. The research aims to demonstrate trademark protection in Indonesian law and Islamic jurisprudence. This research falls within the library search, and its description is an analytical and critical description. After careful consideration, the research concludes that Indonesian law and Islamic jurisprudence are in agreement of considering the trademark as property and right. So, they agree on the necessity of trademark protection and imposing the punishment for the aggressor. Meanwhile, they differ in the imprisonment; the law considers it as a basic punishment while Islamic jurisprudence considers it as a secondary punishment
Al-‘Alāmah al-Tijāriyyah wa Ḥimāyatuhā fī al-Qānūn al-Indūnīsī: Dirāsah Fiqhiyyah Taqwīmiyyah Husnul Haq; Arif Ali Arif
Al-Ahkam Vol 30, No 2 (2020): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (604.026 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2020.30.2.5293

Abstract

The trademark plays an important role in economic life, as it is a way for the merchant to distinguish his products from those produced by others. It also helps consumers to identify the products they want. Therefore, the countries of the world have agreed to conduct agreements to protect it, on top of which is the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). When the State of Indonesia agreed to sign this agreement, it had to provide legal cover in the field of the trademark. The research aims to demonstrate trademark protection in Indonesian law and Islamic jurisprudence. This research falls within the library search, and its description is an analytical and critical description. After careful consideration, the research concludes that Indonesian law and Islamic jurisprudence are in agreement of considering the trademark as property and right. So, they agree on the necessity of trademark protection and imposing the punishment for the aggressor. Meanwhile, they differ in the imprisonment; the law considers it as a basic punishment while Islamic jurisprudence considers it as a secondary punishment
PENGGUNAAN ISTISHAB DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PERBEDAAN ULAMA Husnul Haq
Alhurriyah Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Januari - Juni 2017
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (561.434 KB) | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v2i1.244

Abstract

Islam is a comprehensive religion. The comprehension of Islam does not lie in the completeness of the content of the Qur'an and Hadith, because in fact the verses of the Qur'an and Hadith are limited in number, while the human problems are growing. So, the role of ijtihad as a means of reform of Islamic law is vital. One of the methods of ijtihad is istishab. This study aims to describe the nature of istishab, clerical opinion about the value of its strength as a source of law, as well as the influence of ulama's opinion about the value of his resistance to differences of opinion in Islamic law. The approach used in this research is descriptive-qualitative. By using this method of research, this study concludes that the majority of scholars of the Maliki, Shafii, and Hambali sect assert that istishab is a hujjah to defend something that already exists (daf'i) and establish something that does not exist yet (itsbat). The late ulamas of the Hanafi sect assert that istishab is a hujjah in defense of something that already exists, while the majority of the Hanafi scholars and some scholars of the Shafi'i sect state that istishab is not a hujjah at all. The difference of the ulama's view of the use of istishab in ijtihad has led to differences in their views on Islamic law, as in the case of the law of the disappeared’s inheritance. Islam merupakan agama yang komprehensif. Komprehensifitas Agama Islam tidak terletak pada kelengkapan kandungan al-Qur’an dan Hadis, sebab faktanya ayat al-Qur’an dan hadis jumlahnya terbatas, sedangkan permasalahan manusia semakin kompleks. Karenanya, peran ijtihad sebagai sarana pembaharuan hukum Islam sangatlah vital. Salah satu metode ijtihad adalah istishab. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan hakikat istishab, pendapat ulama tentang nilai kehujjahannya, serta pengaruh perbedaan pendapat ulama tentang nilai kehujjahannya terhadap perbedaan pendapat dalam hukum Islam. Pendekatan yang penulis gunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif-kualitatif. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian tersebut, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa mayoritas ulama dari mazhab Maliki, Syafi’i, dan Hambali menyatakan bahwa istishab merupakan hujjah untuk mempertahankan sesuatu yang sudah ada (daf’i) dan menetapkan sesuatu yang belum ada (itsbat), sedangkan ulama Muta’akhirin dari mazhab Hanafi menegaskan bahwa istishab merupakan hujjah dalam mempertahankan sesuatu yang sudah ada saja, sementara mayoritas ulama mazhab Hanafi dan sebagian ulama mazhab Syafi’i menyatakan bahwa istishab bukan merupakan hujjah sama sekali. Perbedaan pandangan ulama tentang penggunaan istishab dalam ijtihad ini ternyata menyebabkan perbedaan pandangan mereka dalam hukum Islam, seperti dalam kasus hukum waris orang hilang.
Merek Dagang dalam Perspektif Fikih Islam Husnul Haq
Jurnal Penelitian Agama Vol 12 No 2 (2011)
Publisher : IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2357.58 KB)

Abstract

This research aims at studying the trademark from fiqh perspective. It looks into the definition of the trademark, its functions, and forms. At the same times, it studies the main concepts which can be considered as an introduction to this study and an explanantion of al-Takyif al-fiqhi (the adaptation of doctrinal statement). This research relies on analytic and critical methodologies, as well as comparative methodology to arrive at its conclusions. Among these conclusions are that trademark from the fiqh perspective is considered as property, benefit, and right that are guarded by shara’. This research demonstrates that there are many kinds of trademark infringement, such as counterfeit, imitation, trading in counterfeit or imitative goods, etc. Therefore, ta’zir can be considered as the most suitable punishment for trademark infringement. This study will also find out whether or not zakat of it should be taken from its net yield by 2,5% after hawl.
PENGGUNAAN ISTISHAB DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PERBEDAAN ULAMA Husnul Haq
Alhurriyah Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Januari - Juni 2017
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (561.578 KB) | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v2i1.244

Abstract

Islam is a comprehensive religion. The comprehension of Islam does not lie in the completeness of the content of the Qur'an and Hadith, because in fact the verses of the Qur'an and Hadith are limited in number, while the human problems are growing. So, the role of ijtihad as a means of reform of Islamic law is vital. One of the methods of ijtihad is istishab. This study aims to describe the nature of istishab, clerical opinion about the value of its strength as a source of law, as well as the influence of ulama's opinion about the value of his resistance to differences of opinion in Islamic law. The approach used in this research is descriptive-qualitative. By using this method of research, this study concludes that the majority of scholars of the Maliki, Shafii, and Hambali sect assert that istishab is a hujjah to defend something that already exists (daf'i) and establish something that does not exist yet (itsbat). The late ulamas of the Hanafi sect assert that istishab is a hujjah in defense of something that already exists, while the majority of the Hanafi scholars and some scholars of the Shafi'i sect state that istishab is not a hujjah at all. The difference of the ulama's view of the use of istishab in ijtihad has led to differences in their views on Islamic law, as in the case of the law of the disappeared’s inheritance. Islam merupakan agama yang komprehensif. Komprehensifitas Agama Islam tidak terletak pada kelengkapan kandungan al-Qur’an dan Hadis, sebab faktanya ayat al-Qur’an dan hadis jumlahnya terbatas, sedangkan permasalahan manusia semakin kompleks. Karenanya, peran ijtihad sebagai sarana pembaharuan hukum Islam sangatlah vital. Salah satu metode ijtihad adalah istishab. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan hakikat istishab, pendapat ulama tentang nilai kehujjahannya, serta pengaruh perbedaan pendapat ulama tentang nilai kehujjahannya terhadap perbedaan pendapat dalam hukum Islam. Pendekatan yang penulis gunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif-kualitatif. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian tersebut, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa mayoritas ulama dari mazhab Maliki, Syafi’i, dan Hambali menyatakan bahwa istishab merupakan hujjah untuk mempertahankan sesuatu yang sudah ada (daf’i) dan menetapkan sesuatu yang belum ada (itsbat), sedangkan ulama Muta’akhirin dari mazhab Hanafi menegaskan bahwa istishab merupakan hujjah dalam mempertahankan sesuatu yang sudah ada saja, sementara mayoritas ulama mazhab Hanafi dan sebagian ulama mazhab Syafi’i menyatakan bahwa istishab bukan merupakan hujjah sama sekali. Perbedaan pandangan ulama tentang penggunaan istishab dalam ijtihad ini ternyata menyebabkan perbedaan pandangan mereka dalam hukum Islam, seperti dalam kasus hukum waris orang hilang.
مقاصد الشريعة وأهميتها في االجتهاد Husnul Haq
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 1 No 2 (2017): July 2017
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (284.196 KB) | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v1i2.76

Abstract

Ijtihād is an important way to discover the law over new issues. The need for ijtihād in the present becomes even more important as the problem develops with the development of science and technology. Scholars (ulama) are urgently needed to discover the law over these new problems by using the correct method of ijtihād, by using texts without putting aside the reality of life and the intentions (maqāshid) behind those texts. This research aims to describe the urgency of maqāshid sharia in ijtihād. The study begins by explaining the meaning of ijtihād as well as maqashid sharia, and finally discovering the use of maqāshid sharia on the contemporary fatwas. The approach used in this research is descriptive-qualitative approach, because this study is intended to reveal and describe the meaning of ijtihād as well as maqāshid sharia, and the use of maqāshid sharia on those fatwas. By using research methods outlined above, it can be concluded that the maqāshid sharia have an important role in ijtihād. Therefore, the contemporary scholars relay on the maqashid sharia in their fatwas; in worship, transactions, family jurisprudence, modern medicine and others.
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in Secondary Schools in the Digital Era Husnul Haq; Wakidi
International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning Vol. 2 No. 4 December 2024: International Journal of Post-Axial
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/postaxial.v2i4.391

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in Indonesian secondary schools within the digital era. The curriculum aims to foster a flexible, student-centered education to enhance creativity, independence, and adaptability among students. Utilizing qualitative methods, including interviews, observations, and document analysis, the research explores the curriculum's impact on teaching practices and learning outcomes. The findings indicate that the curriculum has effectively introduced project-based learning and digital tools, creating a more engaging and interactive classroom environment. Students have demonstrated improved academic performance and growth in essential soft skills such as communication and collaboration. However, challenges persist, including disparities in digital infrastructure between urban and rural areas and varying levels of digital readiness among teachers. Teacher feedback highlights positive aspects of the curriculum but also points to the need for more professional development and support. Students appreciate the curriculum's relevance but suggest improvements in assessment guidelines and feedback mechanisms.
PENGGUNAAN ISTISHAB DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PERBEDAAN ULAMA Haq, Husnul
Alhurriyah Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Januari - Juni 2017
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v2i1.244

Abstract

Islam is a comprehensive religion. The comprehension of Islam does not lie in the completeness of the content of the Qur'an and Hadith, because in fact the verses of the Qur'an and Hadith are limited in number, while the human problems are growing. So, the role of ijtihad as a means of reform of Islamic law is vital. One of the methods of ijtihad is istishab. This study aims to describe the nature of istishab, clerical opinion about the value of its strength as a source of law, as well as the influence of ulama's opinion about the value of his resistance to differences of opinion in Islamic law. The approach used in this research is descriptive-qualitative. By using this method of research, this study concludes that the majority of scholars of the Maliki, Shafii, and Hambali sect assert that istishab is a hujjah to defend something that already exists (daf'i) and establish something that does not exist yet (itsbat). The late ulamas of the Hanafi sect assert that istishab is a hujjah in defense of something that already exists, while the majority of the Hanafi scholars and some scholars of the Shafi'i sect state that istishab is not a hujjah at all. The difference of the ulama's view of the use of istishab in ijtihad has led to differences in their views on Islamic law, as in the case of the law of the disappeared’s inheritance. Islam merupakan agama yang komprehensif. Komprehensifitas Agama Islam tidak terletak pada kelengkapan kandungan al-Qur’an dan Hadis, sebab faktanya ayat al-Qur’an dan hadis jumlahnya terbatas, sedangkan permasalahan manusia semakin kompleks. Karenanya, peran ijtihad sebagai sarana pembaharuan hukum Islam sangatlah vital. Salah satu metode ijtihad adalah istishab. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan hakikat istishab, pendapat ulama tentang nilai kehujjahannya, serta pengaruh perbedaan pendapat ulama tentang nilai kehujjahannya terhadap perbedaan pendapat dalam hukum Islam. Pendekatan yang penulis gunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif-kualitatif. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian tersebut, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa mayoritas ulama dari mazhab Maliki, Syafi’i, dan Hambali menyatakan bahwa istishab merupakan hujjah untuk mempertahankan sesuatu yang sudah ada (daf’i) dan menetapkan sesuatu yang belum ada (itsbat), sedangkan ulama Muta’akhirin dari mazhab Hanafi menegaskan bahwa istishab merupakan hujjah dalam mempertahankan sesuatu yang sudah ada saja, sementara mayoritas ulama mazhab Hanafi dan sebagian ulama mazhab Syafi’i menyatakan bahwa istishab bukan merupakan hujjah sama sekali. Perbedaan pandangan ulama tentang penggunaan istishab dalam ijtihad ini ternyata menyebabkan perbedaan pandangan mereka dalam hukum Islam, seperti dalam kasus hukum waris orang hilang.
The Role of Higher Education in Egypt's Economic Development: Policy Analysis and Implementation Husnul Haq
Innovative Journal of Educational Research and Insights Vol. 1 No. 1 September 2024: Innovative Journal of Educational Research and Insights
Publisher : PT Mutiara Bustan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research investigates the role of higher education in fostering economic development in Egypt, focusing on policy implementation and the alignment of educational outcomes with market needs. The study utilizes a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative semi-structured interviews with students, educators, and policymakers to explore perceptions of higher education's contribution to economic growth. The findings reveal that while Egypt's higher education system has made significant progress in increasing accessibility, there remain gaps in the relevance of education to the labor market. Regression analysis highlights a positive correlation between educational attainment and economic indicators, though skills mismatches persist. Case studies of successful university-industry partnerships underscore the importance of practical, hands-on learning and innovation in driving economic progress. Furthermore, comparisons with global best practices, particularly in South Korea and Finland, provide insights into potential policy reforms. Recommendations include enhancing university-industry collaboration, improving curriculum relevance, and investing in research and development to ensure higher education in Egypt supports sustainable economic growth