Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

TEACHING PHILOSOPHY, GROWING CHILD’S EMPATHY : DERRIDA’S TRACE THEORY FOR CRITICAL THINKING AND CHARACTER EDUCATION Fraya, Fatimah; Hadinata, Fristian
International Review of Humanities Studies Vol. 10, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Child bullying cases increased significantly following the pandemic and took its toll on the need for emergency tackling and preventive action. This research focused on philosophy as a an approach to character building, using the synthesis method of literature views which also inspired from previous teachings known as Philosophy for Children (P4C), combined with hands-on experiment simulation. The aim is to discover a practical learning concept to enable philosophy to be introduced in children's classrooms at a certain age. Researchers found the intersection between philosophy and child character building beneficial in refining their empathy cognitively and creating better generations in avoidance of abusive behavior as part of their day-to-day education. In the discussion, philosophy was introduced choosing the ideas of Jacques Derrida which are considered relevant. Reflective to his childhood, in which Derrida had experienced discrimination, the experience evolved in his breakthrough ideas of hermeneutics, using the deconstruction technique. The simulation experiment study shall revolve around Derrida’s Trace Theory and Différance, both a refreshing concept as learning materials. The result is a recommendation that philosophy worth being considered as an instrument of learning activity in Indonesia’s classroom, using simulation method that can invoke further curiosity in children’s critical thinking and character education.
The Role of Intersubjectivity Philosophy in the Disputive Group Relationship Era Alvian Apriano; Naupal Asnawi; Fristian Hadinata
Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY) Vol. 4 No. 10 (2025): Injurity: Interdiciplinary Journal and Humanity
Publisher : Pusat Publikasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58631/injurity.v4i10.1484

Abstract

In contemporary Indonesian society, religious groups face critical challenges in maintaining cohesive relationships amidst increasing individualism and political engagement opportunities. The tendency toward individuation—where members prioritize personal interests over collective goals—threatens to erode the foundational bonds of voluntarism and shared commitment that characterize these communities. This research aims to explore the concept of intersubjectivity, particularly Gabriel Marcel's philosophy of co-esse (being-with), as a restorative framework for addressing disputive relationships within religious groups, while synthesizing insights from Edmund Husserl's empathy and Martin Buber's dialogical philosophy. The study employs a qualitative method based on literature review with a descriptive-analytical philosophical-theological approach, utilizing hermeneutic interpretation and thematic content analysis of primary philosophical texts and contemporary empirical studies on Indonesian religious group dynamics. The analysis reveals that Husserlian empathy provides the foundation for recognizing shared reality through analogical apperception, Buberian dialogue distinguishes authentic I–Thou encounters from instrumental I–It relationships, and Marcelian intersubjectivity offers the most comprehensive framework by grounding human existence in relational ontology rather than isolated individualism. The research concludes that Marcel's intersubjectivity transforms relationships from strategic utility to existential co-existence, providing both diagnostic clarity and normative guidance for religious communities navigating political complexities. The implications extend theoretically by bridging existential phenomenology with empirical social analysis, practically by offering ethical frameworks for group governance and leadership formation, and policy-wise by suggesting governmental approaches that respect communal character rather than incentivizing instrumental participation, thereby strengthening both religious group integrity and broader social cohesion.
Rethinking Electoral Democracy through Islamic Epistemology: Electoral Perception, Epistemic Justice, and Democratic Legitimacy Masduri, Masduri; Hadinata, Fristian; Adian, Donny Gahral
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2026.16.1.219-246

Abstract

Electoral democracy is commonly evaluated through procedural criteria, whereas the epistemic conditions that shape citizens’ political judgments remain insufficiently theorized. This article addresses this gap by reconceptualizing electoral perception as an epistemic structure through which political knowledge is formed prior to electoral choice. Employing a normative-conceptual approach, it synthesizes social epistemology, Miranda Fricker’s theory of epistemic injustice, and Islamic epistemology to examine how political knowledge is produced, transmitted, verified, recognized, and critically evaluated within electoral contexts. The analysis demonstrates that electoral perception is constituted through testimony, trust, epistemic authority, credibility, and epistemic justice, while informational distortion and unequal distributions of credibility undermine democratic legitimacy by weakening citizens’ epistemic agency. The article develops an Islamic Ethics of Electoral Perception grounded in six interrelated principles—ṣidq, amānah, shahādah, tabayyun, ‘adl, and epistemic muḥāsabah—as a normative framework for evaluating political knowledge. It argues that democratic legitimacy depends not only on procedural fairness but also on an epistemically just environment that enables citizens to exercise responsible political judgment as epistemic agents.
Recognition, Coexistence, and Civic Trust in Gerbang Mas Perkasa Transmigration Area, Sambas Regency, West Kalimantan Fristian Hadinata
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 6, No 3 (2026)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v6i3.627

Abstract

This article examines how coexistence in the Gerbang Mas Perkasa transmigration area, Sambas Regency, West Kalimantan, can be understood through Charles Taylor's politics of recognition. The area is a border transmigration zone in which transmigrant and local communities live within a plural society marked by historical memory, economic vulnerability, ecological pressure, and uneven public services. Drawing on field data from the 2025 Patriot Expedition report, this study uses a descriptive qualitative design supported by survey data from 243 respondents, interviews, focus group discussions, observation, and secondary documents. The findings show that everyday coexistence is not merely the absence of conflict. It is sustained by practical cooperation, shared economic spaces, local-national attachment, and institutional mediation. However, formal tolerance remains insufficient when public trust is weakened by infrastructure gaps, unequal access to economic opportunities, and unresolved perceptions of distributive justice. Using Taylor's recognition framework, the article argues that sustainable transmigration governance requires more than administrative integration. It requires recognition-based governance that protects cultural identity, strengthens intergroup relations, and converts coexistence into civic friendship and solidarity. The article contributes to debates on transmigration, border development, and multicultural governance by proposing a modest analytical model linking recognition, public trust, and plural-society resilience in Indonesian border communities
Philosophical Analysis of Embedded Economy on The Jamaah Islamiyah Terrorist Group in Indonesia Joko Dwi Harsono; Fristian Hadinata
Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/enrichment.v4i5.750

Abstract

This research seeks to provide an explanation of how economics, in the context of efforts or methods to meet needs, is embedded in the behavior of terrorist groups in Indonesia based on a commitment to violence that hides behind the dogma of religious ideology. As Karl Polanyi proposed, economic embeddedness defines the economy as a product of social relations based on wisdom values and mutually sufficient mutual relations between individuals and groups under the auspices of local wisdom. It turns out that other attributes are attached to embedded economics apart from ethical values, namely the commitment of social groups to the path of violence. This research used a qualitative approach that is a critical analysis of actual problems occurring in society, namely the existence of an economic mode in the movement of the terrorist group Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) in Indonesia. The research results found that economic motives play a role in the actions carried out by terrorist groups; in the context of JI, social currency is used in monetary exchange. The Indonesian government has implemented the principle of redistribution with a multidimensional approach in dealing with terrorism, one of which is Karl Polanyi's Economic Embeddedness approach, which involves the redistribution of resources and integration of terrorist groups into broader society, as well as the termination of terrorism funding.